RE: Takeover22 Feb 2022 20:19
oldtramp,
That is a hypothetical question, which I cannot answer.
I remember well the bluster over IM when JW came in, the project was "shovel-ready" and the projections impressive. Turns out that was all BS too, whether by design or incompetence we will probably never know. Either way, the project could have been wrapped in cotton-wool, with a skeleton staff doing the job they were appointed to do, get the gas storage project over the line. Investors would have been frustrated at the delay, but would have accepted an occasional, small, cash-raise to keep the lights on, as long as the staff were performing. That is what we invested for in the first place.
But where would have been the savings (in the directors' bank accounts) in that strategy?