Member Info for Bennster

A perfect example of how ramping is no better than deramping.

An evangelical statement - after all we DON'T know there will be news next week OR that the share will go over £1.
Gets 3 ticks up inside 3 mins.

I am too.
Right up to the point he breaks our bravehearts with a bad RNS.... :-(
God, I sincerely hope not!!!

I get you on the deramping, but there's just too much evangelism on the other side too - can you not agree with that?
You know I'll not disrespect an opposing view, it's the manner of Starknight that makes me cringe!

Booooom

Like the Battle of the Somme. 600,000 casualties here - ground gained NIL

Goodness me. This is turning into an evangelical meeting not a share bulletin board.
If you don't nod your head to Starknight then you're FILTERED!
or apparently banned for 3 days because Starknight says so ?!?

Beam me up Scotty.

Voltaire: I disagree with what you say you but I'll defend your right to say it.

I believe TB has sold because of his age and his desire to turn around a new project. It's not automatically a portent of doom that a director sells, but it can be a cause for concern if there's no obvious reason. There is a public reason here.
I don't blame TB for selling and genuine LTH's have made money here (rise in 12 months and the dividend).
This won't be plain sailing (this is the AIM) but I still have a belief that the investment portfolio here is bigger than the current market cap.

Assuming they are traders they probably capped off their shorts this morning and are having a breather. They'll return if this rises.

As a LTH I'd feel a lot more pain if I lost faith, but I have always said this will bob up and down for a couple of months before there's a long term benefit.
I would trade the dips if I have a magic crystal ball, but I don't so I hold.
I find the hype either way is a cringefest here.

I think it's common knowledge TB is using the funds in Chamberlin - there's not going to be a placing.
However, he and other directors do have options at very preferable rates..... these may be exercised soon.

Been said before, but you can't make a reasoned argument about the de-rampers and not feel the same about the evangelist lunatic fringe telling us to BUY BUY BUY
Both extremes are as bad as each other and ruin the board for the silent majority of LTH and interested investors.

I'm looking on the bright side right now - no MM conspiracies or rabid ramps on here for a few hours at least :-)

You do right sir. Work beckons now..... :-(

#eyeroll emoji

trust you to come back with a blatant ramp!!

oh. I seem to be target now? :-)
I don't like ramping or deramping because it damages the credibility of this company for genuine investors reading this board from afar.
I don't like MM conspiracies because I don't deal in myth and legend.
That doesn't make me a deramper - just a reasoned realist.
I believe in the long term value here - I benefitted from the big dividend and the share price rise before and after.
I believe this share will return profit to me in the long term, but will bob around for a few months.
I would like to see this BB used for reasoned debate each way and show some respect for that. That's how we all learn.

Not sure why that had to be posted twice!!!

User error :-)

True sir, you didn't :-)

true sir, you didn't. :-)

I didn't see it that way TBF.
I thought it was a fair post, not rude, not full of myths and ramps/deramps so fair game.
I'm a bullish LTH but would never presume to shout down a reasoned argument. Each to his own though.

I think its a shame if we value posts on whether a poster hold shares or not.
I agree with daft - the rampers and derampers need dealing with regardless of if they hold or not

I half agree with that :-)
There's plenty with shares posting "pearls of wisdom" we could do without too!!