Member Info for AgentB

Yes, I am aware that Coronavirus is generic, which makes it all the stranger that existing anti-viral remedies have not been extensively investigated and trialled. Not everything is a conspiracy but, at the end of the day, we are forced to confront the reality that HMG doesn’t want an accurate LFT (with thanks to Peterpaz):
From what Colin King said about home use approval….one question was “why are MHRA taking so long to pass tests for home use?.” The reply was MHRA won’t pass any test for home use until the government give the green light they want one.
They only want to vaccinate - and that obsession is starting to look pretty scary to my eyes.

@ Trek I’ve been hunting around for that post where you made several recommendations/predictions. Did it get deleted? I think I’ve been through your posting history for the past week looking for it!

I can’t imagine that Cherry B is good for the liver. Probably a good prophylactic for Covid though.

Yes, after all - according to the article - Pfizer were the first to take out a patent on the Coronavirus spike protein genetic sequence in Jan 2000, so it makes sense that they would be first off the starting blocks. The whole thing stinks!

PAH00 3-5 years to develop a cure whereas mRNA vaccines were produced and approved in a matter of months. Doesn’t make sense.

Not to mention the fact that a near perfect ‘green light’ test has been overlooked in favour of Chinese crap test with the net result that nobody trusts LFTs any more.

I just find it very strange that 18 months into this pandemic, we seem no nearer to finding a cure. The vaccines were rushed through trials whereas treatments are delayed.

Look at Synairgen, look at Niclosamide (Daewoong) Look at Ivermectin
https://journals.lww.com/americantherapeutics/fulltext/2021/06000/review_of_the_emerging_evidence_demonstrating_the.4.aspx

They all seem to work, but no progress is made. Odd to say the least.

So in May 2020, Avacta RNSd the potential for affimers to neutralise Covid, then in June 2020, Sequoia (with it’s patent for antiviral agents, treatment and control of infections by coronavirus) takes a position. The neutralising potential of affimers has not been heard of since.

It also seems to be the only place where there is some proper investigative journalism going on.

A shocking new article in Conservative Woman states that a 20-YEAR trail of patent applications concerning the virus responsible for Covid-19 proves it is neither new nor the result of a jump from animals to humans.

Here are a couple of worrying extracts…

“That first SARS event gave rise to a ‘very problematic’ April 2003 patent filing by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). It was for the entire SARS gene sequence, and for a series of derivative patents covering means of detection, including the PCR test [widely used today purportedly to diagnose cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection].

‘The reason why that is a problem is that if you both own the patent on the gene itself, and on its detection, you have a cunning advantage to being able to control 100 per cent of the provenance of not only the virus itself, but also its detection. Meaning, you have the entire scientific and message control.’

Furthermore, three days after the CDC’s April 2003 attempt to patent the SARS sequence, Sequoia Pharmaceuticals, a private venture-capital funded company founded in 2002, filed a patent application on antiviral agents, treatment and control of infections by coronavirus. This was approved, and published, before the CDC patent was allowed.

‘So the degree to which the information could have been known by any means other than insider information between those parties is zero. It is not physically possible for you to patent a thing that treats a thing that had not been published, because CDC had paid to keep it secret. “

Now, what was our connection with Sequoia again?

https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/twenty-year-genetic-trail-behind-covids-creation/

SOG: “EUA, for vaccines? Are you having a laugh?”

I’m not sure if you are being serious or sarcastic but the MHRA has authorised the Covid vaccines only as a temporary approval under their Regulation 124 (equivalent of EUA in the USA). https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/emergency-use-authorization-vaccines-explained. I believe that the authorisation in the U.K. comes to an end at the same time as the Government’s Coronavirus Act - currently in September.

As for the Governments’ (plural) desire to find a cure…ask them about that on the Synairgen board, or ask yourself why Ivermectin is not being widely used after this study came out.
https://journals.lww.com/americantherapeutics/fulltext/2021/06000/review_of_the_emerging_evidence_demonstrating_the.4.aspx

I am invested here, but deeply sceptical about HMG. Given that they have known about accurate LFTs but failed to progress them at top speed , I fear AGILE may be a similar story.

Meanwhile, jab, jab, jab.

I have to bump this sheer brilliance

Why would you opt for an accurate LFD when you can manipulate PCR testing to suit your purposes? If we want more positives out there to frighten people into getting vaccinated, we just crank up the number of CT cycles. If we want fewer positives to show fax programme is working, we dial it back down to 25.

By the way, does anyone actually know how many CT cycles are currently in use? WHO recommended 25, but USA is still apparently using 40. (Sorry, I read that somewhere at the weekend, but don’t have a link.)

Imagine if Royston also contains helium!!!

The Government’s Covid response policy seems totally fixated on maximising the uptake of the vaccine with no other approaches being considered. To be honest, I am horrified that it has gone so far that they are proposing to vaccination young adults and children who are at negligible risk from the disease itself. Yesterday I read that they are to start trialling monthly jabs as a potential ‘cure’ for long Covid.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-9775925/Can-long-Covid-cured-monthly-dose-vaccine.html

As a shareholder in Avacta, I have seen the company go through endless hoops to try to bring their highly accurate LFT to market, with the Government moving goalposts and awarding £bn contracts instead to the crappy Chinese tests that the FDA has banned in America. Why would the gov not want a highly accurate LFT to be widely available? Answer = because it provides an alternative to vaccination.

Same applies to therapeutics. The moment an adequate cure for Covid is announced, the Government’s EUA for the vaccine is voided. That’s why all companies working on a therapeutic solution are seemingly beset by delays. It’s still entirely possible that Sarum will get taken over by big pharma, but don’t expect a cure to be released while there’s still money to be made from vaccinations.

Steady, I agree with you. The youngsters have had it really hard and there doesn’t seem to be an easy way out for them. I finished my degree in 82, having been told by Tebbit to get on my bike to go looking for work. But we had no debt burden hanging over us. My kids’ generation has been kind, cooperative and totally and royally done over by the powers that be. And still, they are kind and hopeful and loving. Little stars.

Dear Ian, my last prediction was for my own birthday (08/05) which didn’t happen, so please could you put me down for (05/08) which is my partner’s birthday and luckily the inverse of mine which is the only way I remember it! Thanks.

To the backing music of Queen
“ Under Pressure”!

Steady, I feel you should invite Mr Minchin. I am sure he would come as I think he is really interested in telling the helium story as well as the geological and modern day mining story.

Totally agree DG. My dad, also in his 80’s has been sold on the climate change narrative. He is desperately worried that he is contributing towards the burning of the planet. (Despite the fact that he and my mother have not been abroad for 20 years and only drive within a 5 mile radius.)