RE: Case concluded22 Nov 2025 12:57
Zag I was disappointed in Tom leaving ppp but when I've asked why he left, some have said because he was out numbered and had a stronger position as an outsider. I'm not sure if I agree completely but I do know that Tom got deals done and investors to invest over the years so as much as many believe he is a crook, we never got to hear his side of the story (well we did but not fully). I don't think Tom is squeaky clean but he loved ppp that much is known. I don't think he would come back as a CEO but who knows maybe he will do a Q&A with shareholders one day but I doubt it now he's left.
I think some of the pledged shares are for Tom and other major shareholders from the past, I am not sure if Lunn is due some though, maybe some through companies? God knows.
All I do know is ppp 2 should hopefully come back strong providing a good deal is made for both the companies and existing SH's. Hopefully Ukraine is a very good asset but I would love Texas to be brought back under our wing as that's a guaranteed money maker.
Yes zag - those leases exist......... But may be under a diff company name..... Or on "behalf of" another company...
I want ppp back asap but we need to come back with something very good that the market likes