Member Info for AB124

With resistance at 17.4 any breach of the big figure will be interesting.
Have a good day...

Looking quite ebcouraging with no firm offer avaialable ATM (not Automated Teller Machine) but at the moment. LOL

15.72 bid for 100K
15.35 bid for 200K

Krafty
Sadly eveyone's an expert. I would like to see how the critics would have run GB Plc over the last ten months. Obviously it is a doddle. Only got to balance the health of a nation against that of the rest of the world, finite facilities, funding and no template (in the modern world) against which to judge the best way forward. piece of cake actually; simple and the Gov. have been all wrong since the start. Easy to criticise; more difficult to be in the driving seat. It has not been handled without faulrs, but not everything was wrong in my opinion.

LochinvarLass
i see where you are coming from. As you say its an interesting propostion, but the charges become very significant as do the margins. Not for me but good luck in your quest to fine tune the components.
Thanks for coming back.

dickpullar
Seems to me and in my opinion we have acquired ovet the last few months a couple (at least) significant players who can determine almost to the penny where the share price goes and where it closes in a day's trading. Either way, and without a great deal of effort the brave trader may well find themselves on the wrong end of the market more often than not.
Your comment about not knowing whether to sell or buy at this stage probably suggests that those influential investors now have the whip hand, and it is a rash holder who trades to any great extent with their holding.
However as we all know there will be some who try. :-)

LochinvarLass
So is that Arb programme offered by your platform with settlement across the two exchanges through their system via your one dealing account?
If not I don't see how there can be an arbitrage between two exchanges.
Hope I'm not being thick in this matter.

RayPointer
I'm sorry i had no idea what level you were taking your data from.
For some reason I'd decided you were looking at the Interbank market and so the individual prices made by the component Banks represent the trading size and levels (they all being Market Makers)..
As you are looking at broker prices I'll make no further comments simply because each will make their own individual prices (from the Interbank) and will undoubtedly show different levels and sizes.
As there is a stop to trading through to Sunday evening there will frequently be Gaps, but I have no idea what the divergence/convergence from/to the Interbank market would be.
Thanks for indulging me. it sounds like an impressive target you have set yourself, so good luck in the development.

RayPointer
Thanks for that. You mentioned MMs in the same breath. I take it that was a slip of the pen?

Because this is off topic I have started a new thread.
Ref your comments on forex what do you mean by Arbitrage across platforms in forex?
I can understand arbitrage across exchanges in markets with fungible settlement, but how do you apply that for profit to platforms where you have to settle the contra trade on both accounts?
If you d o not want to respond no worries, I'm just intrigued

RayPointer
May I ask in your response to LL were you referring to the forex market regarding Sunday evening prices?

RayPointer
Now you are moving into an area I do not understand sufficiently to post.
In my opinion (and that is all that matters to me) I can make decisions based on experience of the likely timing of data release and that is a great deal easier to determine in Scancell's case. Deals will likely arrive after data (proof of the product). I get that the original hope for mAb but the introduction of cash has been adjudged to be the best way forward in dealing with that IP so that further proof can (hopefully) be shown to enhance the value. No idea of the time scale, and why would we know that? I am actually quite pleased that no one is making projections on that because that would seem to be a great way of hyping the share price only for it possibly to be squashed when the data (however good - or bad) arrives. I think we look at a two year time horizon and hope we get information (or really Data) within that frame. If we do and it is good then it will have been worth the wait. Anyone fancy trading Scancell short in the interim? Not sure it would be a good idea, whatever the 20/50/100 day MAs look, and that's ignoring Crosses golden crosses et al!
No, I reckon Scancell is now an investment. Wait and see.

RayPointer
Trouble is Ray what you really need is the capital.
If you have sufficient you can wipe out the opposition. If you are a government you can do even better. It is certainly not a level playing field. A little like AIM companies, something to which you nodded earlier.
With enough capital the share price in tiddlers (even now) like Scancell can be whizzed around wherever the big players want. That's really why in my opinion the idea of trading this short in anything but the nearest term is potentially disastrous. It may well be that the sales that have allowed the Vulpes action in the last few days have come from another large holder, OR maybe the MMs themselves are short. Look at the effect of MMs joing the bid on enthusiastic buyers, and then the MMs on the offer melting away. That can allow a market to change with very few trades (low volumes) of shares actually changing hands. Sentiment and Data that in my view is what will determine Scancell's fate. Difficult to know which will be the leader though. LOL

Ray Pointer
Hope you crack the algos/AI.
But if you do you will be hunted down and shot by the Banks... LOL

RayPointer
Appreciate your response. That is part of what makes a market, some swear by TA others don't.
If on the day the Chart traders have sufficient clout then the share price will move their way. If on another day the "gut traders" have more clout they win and so on and so on. IF on another day there is a large buyer or seller then nothing can be done about that. So i don't agree it is twaddle because on some days it will have an effect on the share price, but I rather see it as a tool that can be useful at times and is part of the market's makeup. However, you cannot pick and choose. You either look at the charts daily and use it to temper the more extreme intuitions you may get , or you trade by it and hope that you get it right more than 50%. so that's how I see it.
Again Ray, thanks for your comments. :-)

In a similar vein to my post to Chelsea7 could you explain your post 13th December 22.11 which apprears to have contrived references to Aimbig.
It would be helpful if you could explain why both you and Chelsea7 (seemingly only you two posters) who are fixated with the name of Aimbig. Did he disagree with you in the past?
Again, much as I've asked Chelsea7 could we sort this out now so the BB isn't littered with your pointless and baseless allusions (a word i use advisedly)?

RayPointer
For someone with your mathematical prowess I don't need to explain. For others (as you obviously wish to demonstrate) your talent will doubtless allow to to explain much more succinctly than I ever will.
Perhaps you can explain why the price crossing even the shortest MA represents a buy signal of sorts, unless you disagree?
Thanks for your anticipated application of your deeper knowledge.

I believed that we had an agreement on Dec 9th that we would ignore each other's posts so that there would be no spats. I thought a post from you indicated that to be the case. Was I wrong? If not why do you continue to snipe at my posts? This evening's was to another poster on a topic in which you were not involved.
It would be good to settle this now.

WeTookPelham
The SP did not close over the 20D MA and so it is an encoraging sign but not yet fully set. (ref hasiba's comments with which I agree ATM).

where's the close in relation?