Member Info for AB124

RuckRover
Oh i see, sort of.
Maybe I'll butt out, I asumed as I was quoted verbatim C7's response was directed at me.
All very confusing. :-)
Thanks for the pointer (not Ray)
:-)

Chelsea7
Thank you for responding to my post. I assume it wss to me as you quoted me.
Could you explain what your final two paragraphs mean.
Are you saying that the share price reduction today is not determined by the market?
Could you also explain your last sentence or was that meant for someone else?

RuckRover
To add a last comment, Markets hate uncertainty and so do impatient investors. When impatience gets the better of them they sell and so? Yes. the share price reflects that. I'm still happy but some might be less inclined to wait. I know most here have already waited so I'm not saying anything the majority don't already know.

RuckRover
I think that the (possible/likelihood/perhaps even unreasonable) expectation of news in the immediate future can make investors wonder why the share price might weaken. I don't think there would be any reason to expect the price to move upwards at the moment. I think the best people can hope for until news breaks is at best stability around 11p or at worst a drift south until the market has something to get its teeth into. I don't think a gentle weakening is anything for people to worry about (in terms of the longer term expectations for Scancell), but when some investors suggest that there will be news soon, I believe some people get their hopes up when probably there will be no immediate significan announcements.
I don't believe we have a great deal of news to expect at the moment, so I don't expect to see a Northward move at the moment. If we get it , great. If not, nothing's lost and those who want to can get some more shares. Seems pretty OK to me. :-)

From what little I know about Brexit it seems that Macron has taken a position from which he can't withdraw, Germany is trying to mediate and Barnier isn't used to being told, "Non"!
How ironic is that (Gen. DeGaulle)? The sound of things spinning in graves and Brinkmanship/BS.
Technically thy can keep all this going till about 30th... I hope they don't, i can't bear the thought of Kora preaching doom and gloom for another 22 days! :-)

TorquayFan
It'll take time, but our departure from the EU without a Deal will focus minds and I think long term will be the best outcome. A market is a market and if some want to buy and some to sell ways will be found to fulfil those needs. It is a shame in my view that the straightforward trading bloc that we joined in 1973 has changed out of all recognition in its aims and aspirations. They certainly are a very long way from when we joined. It will take some effort and short term pain but I think ultimately we will benefit.

Torquay Fan
Surely the changes that posters retiring and new ones arriving reflects the changes in those who take an interest/lose interest in a stock generally. Is not the change of posters evolutionary (maybe healthy) and to be expected? I imagine those with the most extreme views (right or wrong) are those who are more likely to be apparent by their absence?

This deserves a repost

WeTookPelham

Interesting deal...Today 18:36
https://endpts.com/takeda-antes-up-44m-for-rare-disease-pact-turning-to-oxford-spinouts-exosome-tech/

Based at Oxford science park, Redmile an investor too...

Bunsie
Sorry, the third from last sentence.
Now that's THREE posts you caused!!
Yawn.

Bunsie
If only you'd read the penultimate sentence in my 18.44 you'd have saved the BB two posts on the subject!
Yawn!!

WeTookPelham
Looks very interesting, thanks for posting.

Barbelfisher
Thank you for your contribution which has added nothing to the discussion apart from another insult.
No answers to the original question from early this morning but now Chester, Ratcliffewriter, (possibly Chelsea11 - I don't know what he meant by his cryptic posts) ) and now Barbelfisher making comments but no answers to the question I asked to attempt to find out why i stand accused of being Aimbig.
I make it eight irrelevant posts from four posters to all of which I have provided a response.
As I am no further forward in my quest to establish what Aimbig stood for (or against). I can only assume he was a poster who was not part of the establishment but who actually said nothing significant.
On that basis I will simply ignore any future claims that I am he because there is nothing to dispute.
As there is no problem with Aimbig I can only assume that the accusations will now cease and we can all get on with posting here about Scancell rather than having claims bandied about that a new poster is somehow connected with one who no longer exists.
As there is no evidence shown I hope we can put the whole matter to bed for good. I'm sure the majority here will welcome that idea.
Thank you to everyone who joined in today.

Chester
I replied to a post this morning relating to aimbig. Not sure it was abrasive. I asked for information which has so far not been forthcoming. The most recent messages in reply have been both personal and derogatory.
And I'm abrasive?

Ratcliffewriter
Your 11.40 represents the third inpenetrable addition to the thread. Why are there no straightforward posts rather than oblique and pointless attempts to be clever rather than answer what is really not a difficult question. Silence from posters makes sense but clever but meaningless additions serve little purpose other than to clog up the thread.

Chester it seems to me that the accuser is happy to snipe but not to explain. I have simply asked if there is anyone prepared to explain to me the accused what sort of things Aimbig was saying on this forum. If I am not aimbig why would you accuse me of deflection? I think your intervention is more to fuel the situation rather than to assist.

Chester18
I must be only firing on three this morning. To whom was your comment addressed and deflecting from what? I don't understand your post either.

TorquayFan
I really was interested in finding out who I am supposed to be since I'm regularly accused of being Aimbig. I assume he wasn't keen on some posters here otherwise I imagine he would still be posting. If he was banned does anyone know why?

Chelsea11 09.26
I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.

Chelsea11
Sadly I think you've chosen the wrong posting name to have any form of credibility.
If it is a joke against the legend that is No.7 (a downmarket brand of makeup I believe) I'm not certain that it is funny. But if it is coincidence then i think I might talk to to Admin and get another name approved. Either way in my opinion it wasn't the best choice due to infection by association. Others however may disagree. :-)
All of that purely in my opinion, I hope you don't take it the wrong way unless you are not who you seem Spartacus.

Thought a new thread would be appropriate if there were any replies to my two earlier posts. Since the bb has been quiet lately I doubt there'll be much traffic on this niche subject.