Member Info for AB124

Sorry, forgot to say,
Data Data Data is what we need here...
AIMO

Still seems incredible to me that when we have "Quiet Days" where the SP mangaes to get its head slightly over the parapet that there's the sale to depress back to overnight levels.....
But then..... when the SP falls there's a buyer to make sure it doesn't fall away too far.
Been going on for months, but still people seem not to get it....
As Toyah once said,
"it's a mystery"... but seemingly only to some.... hehe.
Or maybe... Scancell shares represent a "Perfect Market"! :-)
That'll be it; A Perfect Market ;-)
AIMO

Krafty,
Looks to me a bit like someone thought there might be a drop yesterday which (like the earlier one the same poster tried to predict/create a few months back) didn't happen.
I see the Strong Holder reports he's made no reduction to his holding now.
All part of life's rich pattern LOL.
AIMO

For heaven's sake...
One minute it's all, "Why no news?" and then when there's some positive (longer term) infrastructure put in place the future looks bleak and people are not happy.
"Strong Holders" change their mind from one day to the next and not for the first (unsuccessful) time.
But the fuel for Scancell's fire is Data Data Data.
If people don't understand that they need some revision set for them.
Whilst nothing's set in stone, if Scancell are building for the future they must have some view of the likelihood of data flows and what's in them.
If they haven't we might as well all pack up and sell all our shares.
Don't think I'll be doing that just yet, we've still got almost a year to prove at least one of the three trial candidates... Let alone THREE!
Nothing changed here that I can see...Yet!
AIMO

Torquay Fan
If only he'd taken the Chinese approach (apart from the possibility of mucking about with the virus in the first place).
I guess you'd be happy with that?
Actually, i don't care whether you would or not.... I've made my point and I've nothing further to say, unlike some who seem unable to take the subject to a dedicated forum for exchanging their "views" on this matter. It seems to me to have little to do with the technicals of the Covid Battles but more to do with personalities.
Perhaps (and this isn't the first time its been suggested) you could start a new BB and discuss the Covid management somewhere else?
AIMO

So pleased to see there are some here who knew how to manage the Covid emergency so much better than the Government.
Shame those who knew didn't bother to become qualified and expert in the management of Pandemics rather than tell the captive audience here how badly BJ and co have done (and of course by implication how much better THEY would have done)!
It's such a comfort to read the sage words of those clever people who didn't have to make decisions that would influence the outcome of the crisis here (and globally).
it is so unfortunate that we didn't have them running the show for us.
As it was we didn't, and so let me congratulate those clever, clever people who knew it all. You truly are wonderful. Will you be running for Parliament next time so that your expertise and amazing foresight can save us from the next Unexpected Pandemic which I'm sure you'll be able to snuff out in an instant (unlike the poor devils who had to actually do the heavy lifting this time).
I see Dominic Cummings is also telling us how Badly handled it all was... Thought he had his hand on the tiller.
All looks like sour grapes to me.
Hope evetryone who knew how to sort it all out with no mistakes are able to live with themselves. Maybe they should apologise to those who lost people for not having been more effective in their influencing control of the situation. I really hope that they can live with themselves for not putting many of the Global Governments right when they were all getting it wrong.
I hope you are pleased with yourselves for letting us know that you are much cleverer than so many charged with running things.
Bravo for your humility and empathy.
The conceit of some people is overwhelming.

AIMO

At least whatever happens the EOY 2021 results HAVE to be produced by end Of October.
So only a matter of days now...
:-)

Great discovery comrade!
I won't ask why you were surfing under a Russian IP lol... but it made for a fascinating find!
Thanks for the heads up.

Violindog,
Your Sunday 18.47,
Absolutely. An exit target for 50% of my holding achieved at 100p/share would be more than I have ever dreamed of. as to your further sentiments couldn't agree more!
Well said Sir!

Ray Pointer (your Fri 17.31)
This is not just a timeline.... This is a SCANCELL timeline....
:-)

Perhaps there's someone who wants to keep the SP where it is by providing the stock to balance any demand at the moment.
Who knows? (I'm sure someone will want to claim knowledge).
:-)

Cleanerworld,
if Redmile bought any significant size they'll be committed to a bid for the Company and if it is them buying that bid woulod be at 22p
Would be very surprised if they'd want to do that ATM...
AIMO

Well Chelsea7,
In response to your most eloquent post,
"zzzzz"
Perhaps it would be better not to ask questions if you don't want replies. That would suit me fine.
Enjoy the sunshine.
:-)

Chelsea7
"Why hope not to an (sic) RNS??"
Simply because GF123 posted,
"RE: 256k buyMon 16:25
Roses. And 3.59% down. Got to love mms. RNS tomorrow anyone? ATB."

Which implied a Buy indicated a good RNS.
After that was posted a Sell of twice the size arrived.
So if a buy signals a good RNS (which isn't necessarily the case) by extension a sell suggests a bad RNS.
Nothing complicated. Violindog got the lighthearted implication anyway.
Thought I'd better explain as the innocuous comment I made seemed to create a problem.
GF's post was optimisttic because the trade he selected was a buy, I simply highlighted the sell which suggested (on GF's reasoning) the Opposite.
Hope that explains my post.
It was intended as a lighthearted comment.
AIMO

Violindog
:-)

And a 522K sell?
RNS? Hope not.
AIMO

Kashdog, not pure gambling (unless the trader were reckless enough to commit their entire holding to trading).
I agree with you (and have said as much on this forum) that Buy and Hold is a difficult way forward to argue with, but the commitment of a block of shares to "trading the range" over the last six months or so has been a worthwhile process with which I am sure that anyone who subscribes to the "every little helps" approach will concur.
One day there will be a breakout and that trade won't work and that is to be expected, but if kept within sensible proportions no damage done.
I guess my overriding point was that the stability (but clearly defined ranges) that SCLP has shown over the last six or seven months has been not only a bit of a gift but also a very unusual opportunity for any LTH (who like me might not have been clever enough to sell at the 27.5p level) should they have chosen to follow that path.
I'm very much hoping for that illusive breakout on the upside..... I will welcome its arrival at any time, but until it does the continuance of the range will I'm sure be enjoyed by some; particulaly those who know where the top and the base levels are (of which I do not claim ti be one.
Anyway, while we wait IMO I'm sure some (to varying degrees) will have benefitted from SCLP's new found status and hence relaive stability.

Surely the range we are in since Feb this year suggests that no slow drip drip, but equally no spurred rise forward.
As we are range bound why is this?
In fact it has not been difficult to predict the next SP move many times over that period which has been highly profitable for some I am sure. That assumes that as each extreme is reached it is not taken as a signal for a further fall or an about to dramatically rise Share Price, because if it has then that will demonstrate who is facilitating the profit for the range traders.
I just wish I knew how long Scancell can continue to provide such easy short term profits for those who are patient and observe and trade accordingly.

Roses
But significantly few notifiable transactions.

Actually Cleanerworld I haven't been surprised to see the Sp stay in the range we have seen, but it's not IMO about the BOD trying to give LD some cash. It's more to do with Scancell the Company and what the Market (in the widest possible sense) thinks.
Certainly won't argue with Kashdog's comments either.
AIMO