Charles Jillings, CEO of Utilico, energized by strong economic momentum across Latin America. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
BBG, who are the derampers working for MMs, and who are the holders with a less positive view of the current state of affairs? It would be good to get your definitive list. I see one or two clearly out for their own ends, but also a lot of LTHs who hate how much they've lost at the hands of new management in the last few months.
Don't listen to the muppets...
Tesla1. Join a long ever increasing list of those bullied by fdyjn. Over the years, it's been his only contribution. If you look at his history, he thinks of himself as some sort enforcer. Complete clueless norbet
Fortissimo. We have complete fantasists on here.
They are just sad people who crave attention. Be it posting they have moved to Ireland, or they live in Australia or whatever. They are to be felt sorry for.
But you. There's something of the night about you. A complete fantasist living in fairyland, who thinks he is so important that his views are the only ones that matter. Your arrogance has no boundaries. Your inability to accept things could of been run better and also your complete disdain for all others, borders on the sinister.
Well if the cap fits! You have no legitimate reason to post on this board other than to disrupt and de-ramp a company which in your own words you are not or never will be invested in. Troll plain and simple fact!
I think Caldwell’s comments were more to indicate that we’re more likely to sell this when we make the numbers add up
Minimum spend for maximum return
Irwin
“I think the previous management team were planning the biggest production possible. When you do this it reduces the number of possible buyers due to the scale and reduces the return on capital. I think a new smarter plan could really unlock the riches at Cascabel.”
The thing is FTJNY I can take the emotion out of any opinion I have and that’s all it is, an opinion, which happens to have been accurate for many years on this stock.
It is amazing that holders of this stock, who are frustrated at the incompetence of the BOD, like to call posters with negative views troll, de-rampers etc
The clue is in the share price ……
However what isn’t beyond doubt there are several rampers red knight etc who post positive, and negative opinions, whilst trading the stock. Hypocrisy springs to mind…..
Not sure when LSE Set up this site they only wanted holders to comment, perhaps they should put that in the t&c’s before signing up if that would make you happier……
Fort, can you point to any exploration licenses that have recently been converted to exploitation? If so I really think that would shatter the argument that is being made here.
Or perhaps you could explain how a nationwide, federal impass in the mining sector will exclude certain regions? That would also help.
"Seems like there is no rush to be pushing mining licenses through at the moment.. unfortunately"
Yes, very true, 'new' mining licences looking rare as hen teeth. Which kinda makes those with licences in areas that are not disputed rather valuable don't you think?? Anyone know of a company with lots of these rare licences in Ecuador? Even Fortescue, Anglo American and Rio Tinto seem to be struggling to find licence blocks that are undisputed.
Bodes well for SOLG.
But let's not dwell on the positives... let's stick with the negatives as far better for BB discussion and our investments. Sic.
Shame on you Colonel...have you descended to the gutter as well as the rest of the tripe flooding this Board...?
"citing two numpties from a BB..."
Again on the licenses topic, though maybe not specifically exploitation licenses, I posted a different article that stated the following…
"The situation is very serious. If that request is granted, the entire industry will stop due to the lack of environmental licenses, not just the mining industry," Benalcázar said.
According to the mining chamber, at least 100 environmental licenses are on hold across all sectors.
Pressure groups are planning countrywide actions on June 5 to demand authorities declare their territories free of mining.
Seems like there is no rush to be pushing mining licenses through at the moment.. unfortunately
Thank you Ortherncopper.
If it is three months, that doesn't give them much time to achieve the exploitation license.
But as usual I suspect they will leave it till the last minute.
Morning Quady.
I’ve contacted a few times but received no reply to any emails.
I posted an article yesterday morning, an interview with Cauldwell, which indicated it would be released in around 3 months.
This is unlikely.
But if anyone still has contact with the company.
Could they ask for a date by which time the strategic review will be released.
Fort. I've just fact checked your fact checked reply to orthen.
He said
" It feels like the little guys has been shafted".
Your reply
WHY?? What exactly has happened or changed since we acquired 100% ENSA " and you said this protects the little guy.
Fact 1,The little guy was shafted before we acquired. Ensa.
Fact 2, if long term holdersare bailing out at 17p, others will surely follow with any increase.
Fact 3, you say the next price rise will be the precursor to the big one.
What big one, if we're sold for the exceptionally generous mark of. 60%, it makes the sp less than 30p. Hardly the big one.
Zoros. Ref your post, newmont turning up to pull out of solg in ecuador.they may not be the first.
It's now pretty much nailed on that fmg are on the way out
Ho hum.
Oh , not sure what the Mrs is doing with hers btw , please don't ask me.
I might just sell a million tomorrow but keep a couple of million incase we fall further. Will update this board accordingly.
Good evening addicknt and SharketMare.
Another thought on how we construct Alpala while not being a mine builder.
Is we JV and someone else builds it.
I believe this is a possibility and if staged we could do this and keep over 50 percent.
Hi Quady, I guess it's a possibility, but not something I'm willing to risk and be a part of. If I had an average sub 5p as you do I'd be more willing to ride it out and see. Best of luck.
Completely agree Add. I get that a good few are getting despondent but the fact still remain this world class asset is up for sale and we've got a man on it. Scott staying on with other exec's will be part of the deal to manage Cascabel into the next phase. Nothing I've read today ( thanks for sharing IT ) has changed my option, however I recognise I could well be wrong. C
Q, obviously you can see the contradiction. I believe it's possible to 'advance casacabel' without having any intention of building a mine. Earlier today I referred to this as 'prettying up' the asset prior to sale.
Good evening SharketMare.
Thank you for posting the link .
You are quite right on two occasions he says we are not mine builders.
However in the early part he talks about advancing Cascabel.
This can be done by Solgold by buying in the Civil engineering expertise and constructing Alpala, as I have said on more than one occasion.
I think we all need to await the strategic review, as something is happening and as shareholders we need to understand what.
You state:- “ I don’t care what happens to this stock as I’m not or ever will be invested in this share ” So if your not invested in Solg what the h£ll are you doing posting on here?!!!!
I have other investments and never post on their BB’s and certainly it would never in a million years cross my mind to post on the board of a stock I’m not invested in! So what’s your game posting on here? Is it just a game to you? Troll might be an apt description for you!