Chris Heminway, Exec-Chair at Time To ACT, explains why now is the right time for the Group to IPO. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
The Con, certainly more Guff than Muff.
Marcosino, I'd say north of 90% of posts on this board are unsubstantiated guff.
Amuses me that Si Derman would come out and defend Blair Peach of all people, one of the most libellous, disgusting trolls that has ever inhabited these boards, coming out with nothing but unsubstantiated guff..
This line really made me chuckle:
"Would rather read some of his posts than some of the vile posts that have graced these boards"
Makes me realise they are all part of a clique intent on spreading misinformation, sewing doubt and trying to create fear amongst invested PI's so they can make an extra few quid on their trades, a rather pointless existence in my view
B, I know you're desperately trying to turn this thread into a thread about you like the narcissist you are but let's keep it on topic.
Si, yes I have checked that in the past. I said "pretty sure" but it was a while ago and I may well be referring back to the post Dog just quoted as I can't find anywhere he explicitly states that he sold. His posting history does suggest he sold at some point however, you don't continually talk down your investment and try to convince people not to buy if you want your losses reduced.
To be fair to BlairPeach, he likely has held shares since then. I believe I have mentioned several times that there is a pattern to the times when he and other bitter former INFA holders show up. Usually it's silence on a rise and hammering the board with negativity when it's trending down. No doubt flip flopping between long and short. As a chartist you should have spotted it yourself.
It's odd that his shareholding seems to be more important than the reasoning for his removal from the site. Though given the fact his posts haven't gone anywhere my guess is he hasn't actually been banned and it's a case of forgetting password or the login system glitching or whatever. I had problems logging in here once after getting logged out.
I hope as his ADVFN post suggests that he hasn't actually taken a 60% loss and went short, because that's going to turn out to be an expensive lesson when finance arrives. I didn't believe that comment at first, but you're doing your best to convince me that he really has gone down this path.
I'm going to leave it at that as it's a bank holiday weekend and I have better things to do. Hopefully this long overdue finance arrives on Tuesday.
Give it a rest TDF......
Costings maybe LSEO3
Some people may well wonder why Si Derman failed to post this later post by BP.
Price: 7.35
No Opinion
RE: Methil and Saipem3 Oct 2022 00:27
Wow! I assumed from your earlier post that you had, at least, reduced your position. If not, you are looking at a mid- to high- six figure loss, with no prospect of return. It makes my 30k+ loss small beer...
You only lose when you sell. Especially if its just prior to a 400% rise.
Hmm , too much time in the POTing shed me thinks.
I not going to get too into this but please don't just carry on in the same manner of repeating stuff. There are people better suited and actually thrive on it. But...
" I am pretty sure he posted in 2022 that he had sold at a loss as he had lost faith in the company. "
So your pretty sure, but did you ever go back and check that was what he actually posted? Or just took it on faith from someone who repeatedly posted that he did, and then others joined in, and are now you are just doing the same yourself? Isn't there something about if something is said often enough people start to believe it to be the truth?
Well, Bp's posts are still there, fwiw. This from September.... before FSS.
"BlairPeach Posted in: HARL Posts: 838 Price: 9.50 No Opinion
RE: Current SP5 Sep 2022 18:37
Nope, still holding. I have lost so much that, perversely, I want to follow this to its inevitable conclusion. A real lesson in greed, from which I am learning.
Tomorrow might be fun, if anyone has the cojones to ask the real questions (I can't be there)."
Opps sorry wrong board 😂
Broomtree, you claimed that HARL was producing FCF . Is that true.
Anyone has full access to this article?
https://www.law360.com/financial-services-uk/articles/1823267/vanquis-bank-seeks-4-5m-for-law-firm-s-complaints-deluge
X - you make my point perfectly; even to the point of contradiction. You know nothing about peoples holdings, mine or Blair’s
Given your powers of observation that’s hardly surprising; the ‘one’ who left has been back twice, indeed is still here under another guise
As to post quality feel free to copy and paste anything I’ve posted that was untrue…. I do realise facts aren’t your favourite topic
I don't recall any post by BP being offensive t.b.h.?, but maybe there was one and it was taken down before being read by all. don't agree that all his posts from years are removed, makes no sense.
With a constant spread of 8% and a stagnant range of 12.5 to 13.5 for ages it would be good to see a positive RNS put up over the long weekend to shake things up on opening Tue. morning and hopefully break this cycle..
Currently on Tuesday there will be a general debate on defence. This was due to have taken place about a month or so ago but emergency legislation needed to be rushed through so it was dropped. If I was too guess the following is likely to be raised.
Defence Spending in Northern Ireland
Service accomodation
AJAX
Defence procurement.
Due to a prior engagement I would not be able to watch the debate so can somebody let me know how many of these topics do get mentioned.
Xenor yes agree there
B, if someone states that they have sold and then post excrement for months/years (as you also do constantly) then I can comment on their position. If you/they don't want people to comment on it then don't make it a discussion point! Not difficult.
X - the arrogance of ignorance! People have no idea who holds what and when… why does it matter, it doesn’t affect your position?
Of course it's teary. We all know he "was" invested in the INFA days, that's why I specifically said last two years. I am pretty sure he posted in 2022 that he had sold at a loss as he had lost faith in the company. This was right before the FSS announcement. Of course the evidence is gone now along with his account.
My opinion has always been that there isn't enough moderation on these boards. Some of the things that have been said over the years I have been here have been downright vile and yet those posters are still here, with the exception of one famous poster who got removed several months ago.
Negative opinions should be allowed, the bear case should never be ignored and that's why I sometimes engage with certain people on ADVFN. But when that negativity turns to disruption or false information for the sake of trolling then that's where it crosses the line. Not saying BlairPeach did that, but some people have been known to.
Reality is no one other than the site admins know why he has been banned. Good chance he posted something he shouldn't have and the post was deleted before most of us saw it. I haven't seen anything ban worthy from him recently anyway - but that's not to say he hasn't. I don't check these boards constantly.
Hardly teary, X. Yes, I've been around long enough you would known that of course he was invested. Obviously it's been twisted by some to make out that he wasn't, or sold at a loss, or was shorting. Same old thing when someone is not always ultra bullish. And of course some people just lapped it up with ever going back and checking. TBH, I can't think of many people the post on here that have not, at some point or other, been targeted in a similar fashion. Including long standing respected posters, previous TR1 posters and many others. Yes, he might not have had many a good word to say about the Bod or the direction the company had taken, but after time served during all the dilution years think he earned the right to speak his mind. Would rather read some of his posts than some of the vile posts that have graced these boards. I don't have to always agree with someone to take on board their opinion. Will probably be lambasted for say such things , but will miss his take on things, tbh.
Donald Trump is considering plans to push Nato members to increase defence spending to 3 per cent of GDP if he wins a second term in the White House, The Telegraph understands.
The former president thinks member states should be asked to contribute more to the alliance’s collective defence in light of threats from Russia and China.
He also believes the accounting rules should be changed so that spending on military assistance for Ukraine is not counted towards the target – a policy that would push several countries below the current target of 2 per cent of GDP.
Partial extract
I was just casually browsing the ADVFN board and there's a teary post from BlairPeach who claims their account has been removed from here. I must say it's interesting, as while I disagree with 95% of what he used to post I don't see why he would have randomly been banned. Unless he just trolled the board a bit too much. Seems ADVFN will be his new home, which has pretty much just become a forum for shorts to whine to each other about how much they hate JW and the company.
Even more interestingly is he is claiming he has now sold his position and is shorting. Does anyone here actually believe he was invested given his posting history? I doubt he had held a single share in the past two years.
The weakest average earnings number since 2021 has pushed bond yields down and made shorts in fixed income and Equities scramble for cover. The Fed will take notice of this.
Heb, all contractors employ subcontractors, why would that necessarily affect any margins? more likely a better way for a growing company to control overhead and costs.
Just after the fire onboard the Searose a poster on this board who had worked on the vessel and had knowledge of the number of subbies involved on the contract gave concern for the actual value of the £60m contract to HARL. It now transpires his post and history have been removed from the board. Guess his post rubbed a few up the wrong way, maybe it was closer to the truth than people want to believe.