The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Question for you ANALytics
Is the maximum number of 5 licences relates to dormant licences not being drilled ?
Looking at the map you posted XTR has 2, GLR HAS 1 and AFR HAS 7
Surely CB can do a deal whereby XTR and GLR take surplus from AFR for a 50/50 deal on future sale in exchange for drilling costsâť“
I am not referring to your recent article Analytical but one from the Lusaka Times a year or 2 ago (as I very briefly described in my message of 21:45 today}. Following the article which I had previously highlighted regarding from the Lusaka Times, you derided the article purely as `it had come from the Lusaka Times`. As I said, I will recover said article on my return to the UK.
I seem to recall that you seriouslyderided the Lusaka Times a couple of years ago Analytical.
Another level (and cost) of admin and staff. I don't think he's want PLC status, tooo many rules.
Not really if he merges the companies at plc level but continues to hold the licences as they are now registered. That might work as none of the ( to be) named subsidiaries would hold more than 5. Hmmmm.
Going by the performance of AFP, I think Colin has decided to simplify matters. He is taking all 3 Companies to a penny a share then will do a merger on that basis (tongue in cheek for more sensitive types).
Good find Analytical by the way, thanks.
That's the end of that then.
To back up flippers 9.54 am post:
glr.l currently has a littlish higher market cap than xtr.l
I'd have to research to decide if I thought there was merit in merging the two .. or three even, including afp... which I note currently has a market cap of - only- approx. half the size of xtr.l .. and I couldn't be bothered doing that, not least as my hope here is that xtr.l will, by summer 24, find a way of getting its s/p back up towards a fairer 2p and I then down size my position by up to 50% and thereafter not care very much whatever the likes of Colin Derek Bird and his mate Old School Rodney do/say going forward.
If you're reading this CB.
Take Note !!
Flipper:
Don't get me wrong, I can see the economy of a merger but I'd be concerned how the combined shareholding would be distributed amongt existing shareholders.
The companies would have to be valued comprehensively and shares awarded to existing holders accordingly.
I don't think CB would take one salary though, he'd want a combined salary of what he's already getting from the individual companies.
Done properly and with a single CEO it could be a good thing.
Now that is a good idea - a merger that is !! It would also make the larger merged entity a more attractive take-over prospect with licences right in the area where everyone wants to be.
Thankyou for a decent reply flipper.
When I read the AFP RNS I admit XTR first came to my mind !. But I dont think a freudian slip, probably just "auto correct". Also not sure why this narrative about GLR being skint - it has been lending XTR money not vice versa. It has plenty of incoming cash in April plus shares of Afrimat and Sandfire which it can sell.
But on a more serious note, I would have thought it would make sense to merge AFP, GLR and XTR into one company. The same geologists are involved with GLR and XTR and costs could be cut.
Fat fingers Irish. What's up with you today? The misses not sorting you. You seem to have got out of the wrong side of the bed. My question was genuine. Have fun
'my' or 'me' ? I think you must be the typist !!
No danger to my. I'm not the typist.
You are in danger of creating of a false market- albeit without intention. It makes it clear that XRT is a process. The mention of XTR is clearly a typo. Read the whole article and enjoy
It reads like XTR is process.
If it means a company it would infer that my observations are correct about combining all three companies in this venture.
It would make sense, imagine if you had three companies and had a mind set that they were actually yours to do what you want instead having any shareholders. Two of them are skint and need money to proceed but one of them has just done a deal selling the family silver that means it's going to get a drip feed of cash for 3 years that could finance the others without dilution. The problem with that is the shareholders of the company with the cash coming in aren't shareholders of the one's benefitting from the cash. But don't worry we'll lend it to them at a very favourable rate and call it business and we'll get a percentage of the businesses in lieu of actual cash repayments.
And hey presto all the companys get to stay solvent and the guy who runs them get three salaries for a bit longer.......
You couldn't make it up could you ?
Gross representing 100% MRE and African Pioneer has 85% interest in the Project
Not sure why Colin mentions XTR in an African Pioneer RNS....??
Colin Bird Executive Chairman commented "We have made good progress on the Ongombo Project with very significant increases to the previous 'Indicated' and 'Inferred' Mineral Resources and the potential for a 'starter' mine using low-cost open-pit methods. We plan to combine XTR with laser dry sorting technology to separate ore from waste and generate a high-grade concentrate for transport to an in-country processing plant for final separation before metal recovery. We are now sequencing the primary development infrastructure and the process flowsheet. As we advance towards the completion of the ESIA we expect to soon be in a position to move towards project implementation and the completion of development financing."
Colin Bird Executive Chairman commented "We have made good progress on the Ongombo Project with very significant increases to the previous 'Indicated' and 'Inferred' Mineral Resources and the potential for a 'starter' mine using low-cost open-pit methods. We plan to combine XTR with laser dry sorting technology to separate ore from waste and generate a high-grade concentrate for transport to an in-country processing plant for final separation before metal recovery. We are now sequencing the primary development infrastructure and the process flowsheet. As we advance towards the completion of the ESIA we expect to soon be in a position to move towards project implementation and the completion of development financing."
Thanks analytical - those maps are very encouraging for the xtr Zambia licenses , interesting that Ivanhoe took a chunk of Angola to the west as well. Rio and Anglo in the mix as well
Https://www.mining.com/gates-bezos-backed-kobold-says-zambia-copper-find-largest-in-a-century/
As I have long suspected and even written here a while back, when you look at those licences you can clearly see CB is taking the opportunity to buy licences next door to his other companies licences with XTR money.
They can't buy them because they are both on their arze financially. So it follows that their lack of success and consequent tumble in SP will become ours over the next three years of spending our money.
I do think it's bizarre that almost every single building material has gone up in price specially since the start of the pandemic and metal is still stuck in the same range as before.
Almost as if inflation doesn't affect metals. Or, god forbid, someone was controlling the market...
Copper needs to hit $6.26lb just to be worth the same value once you take into account inflation adjustment alone since the $4.62lb high of 2011. That is without any of the expected demand needs that copper is central to, for the world to decarbonise and reach net zero.
$4-$5.lb is well within reach.