If you would like to ask our webinar guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund a question please submit them here.
Iky: Your "It`ll come when its meant to come". . . . . . . or, to be accurate, more often it won`t! I have been around the AIM long enough to note that the majority of `mini-miners never actually do `come`, despite the plethora of hundreds of apparently `knowledgeable` researchers (aka `dreamers`)who spend their time on boards like this - ever optimistic, but never accepting the simple modus-operandi of the AIM and, in particular, the mini-miners. GLR is a case in point!
I am not referring to your recent article Analytical but one from the Lusaka Times a year or 2 ago (as I very briefly described in my message of 21:45 today}. Following the article which I had previously highlighted regarding from the Lusaka Times, you derided the article purely as `it had come from the Lusaka Times`. As I said, I will recover said article on my return to the UK.
Shareswotter: Your "It appears Mr Market thinks Colin is is going to p1ss the £15m up the wall!!"
I doubt very much that Bird will remain manage to remain Compos Mentis long enough to have much influence on the incoming payments!
Believe what you WANT to believe Pinocchio. Bird certainly would not even have sufficient influence to get into a half-decent London Club let alone mix with mega-CEOs. Mr Smith`s yarn is no more than a fairytale.
Mr Smith: Surely, you are not inferring that the `Yorkshireman` might, perhaps, have been Bird?
the CEO of AAL, (with an MCAP of over £24 billion) would certainly not waste his time associating with an AIM mini-tiddler. It just wouldn`t happen!
Gosh gogsthelogs! Seems to me that you have a severe grasp of the non-essentials of life.
I find it difficult to imagine that any investor can see a way out for HE1. Its well-and-truly in a downward spiral.
Well Analytical - I am sure that you must have finally spotted that HE1 is going the same way as your RMM did. A rapid cascade down to nothing. 6P today, but in 3 months time . . . .?
Incidentally, you managed to drop your monica which you use here whilst away on GLR the other day. Careless boy. Attention to detail is so important. Must have been basic, even for an ONC!
As for Bird being busy on Twitter - the pragmatist in me KNOWS FOR SURE that Bird and his GLR Board know far more than those here, who can only hang on to each other`s imaginative dreams, views, opinions and `perceived` knowledge. Some even spend their whole current being, here on the Board trying to impress with such `knowledge` - and continue even when their earlier predictions have invariably come to nought - aka `had been completely wrong`!
But folks, here is the pragmatist in me . . . . . why has neither Bird, nor the members of his Board, shown ANY interest whatsoever in increasing their holding in GLR for WELL over a year? Think about that, for I guess that many, if not most of you have increased your holdings within the last year. Goodness, not to invest further would surely have been foolish when the Clever Mathmatician amongst you has, from time to time, regularly worked out what the future, astronomic gains from this and that hole being dug in the Zambian ground will surely produce. But, in truth, he doesn`t really know does he?
Slightly repetitive, but am I the only one who hasn`t questioned the lack of any recent, further investment by Bird and his men? And, not for WELL over a year and more! Strange that!
So, finally let me add to the regular, ambitious, dreams of so many here - my simple prediction is that GLR will NOT be a multi-bagger during 2024!
To finish, for the last 3 years Oiltap, (who later became Analytical) has unequivocally predicted (in each January) that GLR will become a multi-bagger for each the last 3 years - no ifs nor buts. I suspect that he may be a bit more circumspect this year, knowing that some will notice! But then, he has been clearly predicting that within his countless offerings this year already. We will see!
The copper `bull- run` is, to me, rather academic, just as it has been for GLR too. For months, one or more contributors on both of these Bird boards have been reciting the daily ups and downs of the metal. Why do they think that this is so vital, apart from trying to impress their vision, and showing that they are `always on the ball`?
One simple fact, to me, seems paramount. Copper, and its price, remains completely academic if the company has not, to date, managed to produce any!