George Frangeskides, Chairman at ALBA, explains why the Pilbara Lithium option ‘was too good to miss’. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Why is it called bonefish?
Commonly, bonefish are named for the many fine bones they contain. English common names include banana, bananafish, Indo-Pacific bonefish, ladyfish, round jaw, salmon peel, tarpon, tenny, and tenpounder.
What do bonefish eat?
The bonefish feeds on benthic worms, fry, crustaceans, and mollusks. Ledges, drop-offs, and clean, healthy seagrass beds yield abundant small prey such as crabs and shrimp. It may follow stingrays to catch the small animals they root from the substrate.
Why are bonefish so tough to catch ?
Not only are bonefish naturally good at hiding, but they're also elusive and incredibly stealthy. From making sure that you aren't wearing bright colours or covered in distinctive smells, to timing, measuring, and presenting your casts perfectly, there's a lot that must be done to successfully nab one.
Are bonefish aggressive?
Bonefish are fast, aggressive, and provide that rush of adrenaline every angler seeks. At times they can be difficult to spot and catch but with some pointers, everyone can be well on their way to landing their first bonefish. Bonefish are notoriously wary and great skill must be taken both in approach and presentation when fishing for them. English speaking fishermen often refer to them as “grey ghosts."
Can you eat bonefish?
Additionally, you can only eat the small bonefish of about six inches or under, as the bigger ones may contain a toxin called clupeotoxin, a poison that is common in plankton-eating fish. This poison leads to death in about 50% of the cases, which is extremely high.
How strange that any genuine poster should choose an alias named after such an unpleasant creature.
So, Ladyfish or Banana or whoever you are - be gone and take your poisonous toxins elsewhere. You have no place here.
DEM
Hi boboil “I done your mum” I have not heard that for along time when I used to work in a shop with 8 other lads the gutter humour seemed so funny lol
Hi Bonefish
So you bought shares a long time ago in FoGl and got lumped in here . You have been a member for 11 years and manage 1 post… fair play for not getting involved
I really want to write something witty and clever about your post which seems a really odd time to interject so ….
I’ve done your mum.
Will post again once the ban is finished
GLA
Boboil
Thanks for that useful piece of insight Bonefish. Suggest your second posting is in Q1 next year in recognition of Navitas ‘ confirmed support for the project through FID and the formality of Italy losing their appeal.
Was your user name by chance originally Bonehead and perhaps auto corrected to Bonefish?
Assuming
Thanks for that input bonefish
I am glad to say I will never have to read anything from you again
They plan to export it using penguins so don't worry.
Occasionally I read the inane chats and wonder what you guys do all day.
This is the only time I have made a contribution.
I acquired a large number of Falkland oil and gas shares a long time ago ( what a big mistake ) and now I am a shareholder with Rockhopper.
Rockhopper is now a basket case. Everyone has gone, the board completely depleted, except the chief executive and they have now pleaded with Navitas to help them out. The share price is a penny share.
It is considered that there is no way the executive board of Navitas will do any deal with the pipsqueak British oil company - Rockhopper. Navitas people will not be interested in plying millions and millions of dollars into sucking out the oil thousands of metres below the sea and sea bed. Then having to ship every drop in super tankers to Rotterdam. Navitas will not wish to upset Argentina and the world is turning against the use of fossil fuels.
So stop writing stupid comments on the blog site expecting things to happen in the future, Rockhopper is going nowhere.
An incidently, Italy will never compensate Rockhopper. For heavens sake you are up against ITALY as a country, what a reputation !
At last, Keith Lough has gone and. of course, chairman of Southern Water. Under his chairmanship Southern Water dumped millions of gallons of sewage into Chichester harbour and are still doing it. Go and retire Lough and play golf.
Good explanation, DEM. Thanks to yourself and pauldrayton for the research.
Great link yesterday from pauldrayton:
"My client that is a leader within the Oil and Gas Industry has a key requirement for a COMPEX electrician to carry out remedial works on the Falkland Islands. * This is a 6 weeks contract, all expenses paid. * Carrying out remedial works. * Must have COMPEX experience. * Paying £350 per day, starts August".
According to Google: 'CompEx is the leading national training, assessment and certification scheme for electricians and other electro-technical craftspersons working in potentially hazardous or explosive atmospheres'.
Some of you may recall that as part of their exit from the FI, Harbour Energy came to an agreement with Navitas, Rockhopper and FIG that the ownership of the 'Temporary Dock Facility' (TDF), aka the ‘Noble Frontier Barge’, would be transferred to the remaining JV partners. This provided both a 'clean exit for Harbour' and 'scope to upgrade for Sea Lion development'.
I seem to recall that the original plan was for FIG to build a new Port facility at Port Stanley to replace FIPASS. This would have entailed both FIPASS and the TDF being dismantled and removed. Unfortunately, FIG appears to have rejected the detailed proposals by BAM Nutall on grounds of cost and is still some years away from having a brand new Port. At a stroke this has conveniently converted the TDF from being an expensive liability into a rather useful asset. It now seems very likely that the TDF will be used for Sea Lion related berthing freeing up FIPASS for all other non-SL related shipping. In time, FIG itself may also need the TDF, as the old Port structure (FIPASS) will have to be removed before the new Port - which will occupy the same footprint - can be completed. This may result in a 'capability gap' of several months.
The TDF is approx. 250m East of FIPASS and the single barge & causeway is only approx 15% of the total size of FIPASS. If you type ‘FIPASS Port Stanley’ into the search box of Google Earth Pro – you can zoom into both structures. We know that the TDF requires some remedial works including maintenance work to the footbridge. I would not be surprised if the bridge also carries all the electrical cabling to the barge which may also require some renewal and upgrading to cope with the SL production traffic. With Stanley Services Fuel Depot closeby, I assume that there may also be a pipeline running under the footbridge to the TDF. The combination of possible fumes from the fuel pipes + high voltage cabling, may explain why the advert specifies a CompEx qualified electrician.
The advert seeks one electrician for six weeks - so this is not going to be major works to the Power Station or at Mount Pleasant, who doubtless have their own electricians anyway.
Getting the TDF up and running in Q3 2023 seems a very logical and welcome 'next step' .
Another box ticked!
DEM
It must be the ice cream machine. No offshore work can commence until the ice cream machine is working properly, as everyone knows well !
Https://www.linkedin.com/posts/jo-brown-03923b34_my-client-that-is-a-leader-within-the-oil-activity-7083060039699030016-n3rM?
I wonder what might be starting in August, requiring remedial electrical works.
Https://ats-fig.jgp.co.uk/vacancies/248023-offshore-environmental-adviser?
Don’t give the activist twit any more publicity, she is the product of an indoctrinated brain washed generation with nothing better to do. The stupid dooms day clock is the latest farce. I wish someone would put up a clock saying 6 years until we prove it’s all a hoax, yet again clock.
GLA, just stop idiots
She is by now a marked young lady ,The oil company's and other energy odd bods would like to stop her voicing opinions.
Heading in Telegraph today.
"Greta Thunberg ‘could face six months in prison’"
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2023/07/06/greta-thunberg-charged-oil-rig-blockade-malmo-sweden/?li_source=LI&li_medium=liftigniter-rhr
But she'll probably just get a small fine
Don’t think people realise the ICSID is not just about oil companies taking States to court, it works both ways, a Green energy company investing in Italy for example, planning to build wind farms off the coast then they pull the plug for whatever reason, they could be sued by Italy for walking away.
There will be a lack of big investment projects going forward because companies will be thinking twice about investing in the EU if they pull out of ETC.
LTT
Sunset clause is 20 year
I believe there is a sunset clause of 10 or perhaps even 30 years, so no effect on RKH!
I thought Italy had already pulled out of ECT, but it was too late for Ombrina Mare case because you can't pull out and back date it !
So with no ICSID and no compensation to investors for policy changes, who is going to invest in the EU green revolution? The EU change is not retrospective - does nor affect RKH.
FT Article out today on EU pulling out of ECT and mentions Rockhopper - could be a chance to buy up more shares if it leads to weakness
Fact Five: I agree with you, Boboil.
Fact Six: Your girlfriend: Schitizen does not agree with me.
Hi Latics Citizens
Ok you two appear to have issues regarding facts so let’s state some proper facts ( the rest of you it’s been quiet here)
Fact number one
Some warrants have already been exercised
Fact number two
Of the remaining warrants some will be issued others won’t
Fact three
If RKH doesn’t have enough money to buy hob nobs there could maybe another share raising/ dilution
Fact four
Citizen will agree with me Latics won’t
Like I said a quiet day
GLA Boboil
So even when I state facts you dispute them, Schitizen. None so blind as will not see.
Not even going to ask you to justify your statement. You’re obviously one who likes to hear the sound of his own views and no other.
Read my post again, boy : let’s hope not.
Institutional holders would be exercising and holding. It's a tiny thing by institutional standards with no possibility to meaningfully trade. They'll decide whether to exercise at the last possible moment - pointless to tie up cash that could be earning interest when precisely the same terms are available later.
Laxative knows this but is happy to go on with his nonsense in pursuit of a single-issue agenda