RE: Disappointed5 Jun 2026 22:15
Reflecting further on the second fpso MOU… the more I think about this and how it was announced out of the blue, the more convinced I am that there is bigger plan being hatched. Navitas would look pretty silly if they end up having to scrap the idea due to their junior partner not being able to fund their share, when they know exactly how rockhopper stands financially.
I see three options:
1. Navitas raise money enough to fund Rockhoppers share similar to the current arrangement.
2. Navitas are in advanced talks with a partner, but not yet ready to announce an agreement. At the same time they want to avoid that securing an FPSO slows their expedited phase 2 plan down so sighs an MOU which they probably have to inform the market before it leaks. This is the most likely scenario I think. Rockhopper dropped that piece of news without any hint at how they might go about financing it, should a firm contract materialise. It has almost a casual tone to it I felt, and RKH are likely involved in talks IMO.
3. RKH funds phase 2 by a combination of raising capital (would explain the new appointments), loan from Navitas and perhaps by selling a further percentage to Navitas (or 3’rd partner).
I know an MOU is not binding, but at the same time I am sure it is not something you sign if you are not being serious. And coming back saying “sorry, our partner couldn’t afford it afterall” doesn’t strike me as professional.
I am more and more certain that things are moving fast beneath the surface, and RKH are in a good place.