Member Info for wyndrum

"We have also spoken to large pharma companies which would partner entire assets or for example AVA6000 and can provide the validation we are interested in, as well as the meaningful financial terms, but these larger pharmaceutical companies tend to work very slowly, - want more data, with these types of deals, and we really do require data into phase two, a defined patient population with a defined objective response rate, progression free survival, you know multiple end points and we’re just not there yet."

There you go:... " and we really do require data into phase two, a defined patient population with a defined objective response rate, progression free survival, "

Phase 2. Not phase P1B

Its all about the money......

Might have been a tree shake...?

It depends on the "rules" of the scheme. Shares can be issued but sometimes not cashed for a certain period say, 2 years from receipt. Its seen as a reward but also encourages staff to stay thereby saving experience going elsewhere.

Where was the humour?

what, the punch line: "noted"?

(I think you're safe, Indy)

D, the whole post was ridiculous from start to finish. The fact that 9 posters thought it worthy of a rec is just simply beyond me. It did not have the benefit of wit or amusement let alone any sort of analysis, so I can only assume its a desperate wishing of an alternative reality, which is about as far away from an investment criteria as you could possibly imagine. (Thank goodness it was not a "negative" post exploring fantasy catastrophic news........)

The fact is we do not know if the Heights selling has started, finished or ongoing.

Its just one of any number of facets of AVCT that we have no idea about. (I take it we have not disposed of Coris yet?)

Somebody ask Tim why bhe comments on stuff he wants to ignore? wouls you please?

On the face of it its just non-sensical , but on the other hand I guess he is desperate to show us all how aloof he is from it all and how we should admire his condescension?

Oh, to be more like Tim, with his biting wit and incisive analysis.

(I see a bit more dilution has turned up)

Ive not seen anything but the failed breakout highlighted that the next support down was 271p which it fell to and bounced off. So that's something....

Right now its in a trading range. lets see if 271p holds. (256p would be the next target down with 288p now, the new resistance.)

Maybe a RI that incorporates paying off the loan and as a result it is halting this repayment share sell?

Obviously wild speculation but, in the present circumstance perhaps a dump of shares right now would undermine the RI price that has been worked out/agreed?

"Investing is not trading It is money placed on homework over a period of time, to reward that investor for his time and patience greater than a bank."

What period of time are we talking about? (I just want to know how long I need to hold a stock to stop being a trader.)

How you can use the word "investing" when choosing a mining exploration company that burns money and has no income and has not issued any commercial viability over a discovery they made years ago is somewhat stretching the definition a tad, don't you think?

You could (as an investor) bought this stock 3 years ago for 10p on the basis of your "homework". is that better to endure a 90% capital reduction than to buy today for .95p and perhaps sell in a couple of weeks if the RNS drops?

But will it be in 2 weeks? could it be delayed? could it not be as commercially viable as you wish? What is the impact of the Helium being in water, so far down, How many wells need to make it commercial? what will the cost of a JV be? will it be 50/50 or perhaps a different ratio? Did you see the buy-in of Blue Start coming?

What exactly has all this long term investing homework produced as a way of making money? (which is the whole point as opposed to developing a better "swagger".)

I am not sure I agree with any of that crypt.

"to make money on AIM you have to take advantage of bad news and dips to walk your average down."

The danger is that the individual bought at a higher price and did not expect bad news, now apparently they have to commit more funds (with the potential of over-committing), to increase the potential of further losses being more impactful on their portfolio, on the back of as I say unexpected negative developments.

On the other hand you could/should average up on the back of good news whereby more good news is likely to flow rather than a reversal. Plus all you do by averaging up is dilute your already made profit as a percentage gain.

Your way is much more risky and more likely to lead to increased losses.

"For what your shares are worth now, there is probably more risk in realising your loss now than just holding or better still, adding more whilst cheap shares are available."

There is no "risk" in realising a loss. It crystalises the loss and you move on. You have preserved capital. If the shares fall further then by not selling your loss has increased. Yes the shares could rise, but why have they fallen from the initial purchase price?

it seems common sense to me that prior to every share purchase the buyer should have a plan:

Why am I buying this stock (against others available)? and why at this price, right now?

What price will I sell if it rises? (ie what return do I expect, and by when).

What price will I sell at if it falls and my original premise to buy was incorrect? (Ie what percentage of my capital do I want to risk.)

I never ceases to amaze me the amount of money people "invest" in high risk stocks like this without ever seriously working out any of the above out other than the most vaguest (and therefore practically useless) hopes of success.

Chief, I don't follow volume so I can't offer much insight.

I take the point that around this time normally you would expect more. So I guess either they are not selling right now, or its being done behind the scenes and we are not seeing what is being transacted (dark web and all that), or got completed earlier?

To me its more key where the SP is and currently although hovering around support line, it nevertheless is in bearish territory.

The short term chart is still in down trend with the recent 31p close being a new low. The low volume can indicate 2 things: One there is simply no particular appetite to buy or sell. Or buyers/sellers are waiting for news.

The chart always reflects and projects whats going on from a news pov, so the market is not sure what to do, either break up or break down. its been in a trading range of 31p-43p for nearly 3 months but unfortunately it has in that time produced lower lows and lower highs. So its up to the bulls to take this up.

BG selling must have been a blow to sentiment as II's are thin on the ground as it is. Until new news gives this impetus its difficult to see much reason for gains from here (famous last words), which suggests it would not take much selling to take this lower.

So the stalemate right now looks like those that wanted to sell, have, and those who want to buy will wait for a clearer picture going forward and therefore it looks like all parties will now wait for the results to get a clearer picture of the financials going forward.

This is my take:

This is a delay on reporting. There is no need for it in the normal run of things. Therefore there must be reasons.

The most mundane cause might be the time it took to get a FO in and it has taken longer for him to understand the business and submit the accounts.

(The accounts up to then did not include the sale of the DX division, so its not that. but may have had an impact since. )

My best guess is, the accounts might show a difficulty to trade for the following 12 months or so . (P1b is a bigger trial and therefore more expensive?) Therefore there might have been a rush to get Coris done in the last few weeks/months to bring in some extra funds to overcome a lack of liquidity.

It might be to announce a ND dual listing to raise funds. (This is a clear possibility as while they have the cash right now, this might be the only opportunity to take a cash-step back, to take 6 steps forward, whereas the longer they leave it so the less cash available to orchestrate such a move. Its never been clear to me how serious AVCT have been about this: Was it warm words and a wish list or has it always been a key strategic move that they have been working on for a long time?)

If not a ND listing then maybe its a RI.

The last option maybe, is announcing a license/partnership deal but again I think that could be RNS'd separately without impinging on this "delay"

In any event I think it is most likely to do with funding going forward.

(I don't think it will be anything to do with the science as its a separate thing completely away from the results and would also warrant its own RNS.)

For me its uncertain as to why this "delay" would happen and I am happy to sit on my hands with this and see what occurs rather than gamble on an outcome that might be good for the SP or bad. imo dyor etc

Ha ha Thorn, why not!

Yes, its a fast moving world where we are now in a place where it will be virtually impossible to know fake from real, in news and I am sure many other areas of "normal" life. Yet at the same time the authority that computers have to the reader will only likely increase.

(Not that it matters to anyone, but I got buyers remorse this morning and decide to reverse my purchase yesterday.)

Trouble is D, what questions do you ask? How will it carry on its funding? That is the most pressing question.

How can you rely on RNS's as input when the mislead and only give partial info? same as interviews.

This is how machines take over, not by being smarter but by humans being dumber. If you can't think for yourself competently then you can't ask the right questions. The more you palm it off to a machine the less experience the individual has to think things through more logically for themselves.

This generation is not as smart as it thinks it is. (And as proof you only need to see that our society is fixated on youth to the exclusion of experience, yet see in any field you want to look at, how things have deteriorated in the way that they function.)

Heavy ChatGPT users tend to be more lonely... suggests research

"The 3 amigos have zero interest in learning and understanding"

This is patently untrue. Indeed it is an outright lie!

The " 3 amigos" have expressed caution on some of the enthusiasm and positive bias shown by the majority here with reasonable and considered objections to other peoples posts.

This is an investment board and as a result the financial metrics of the company are of equal if not more importance than the "science" to the individual when deciding what to do, of which none understand, as can be regularly seen when discussing posters with the info in front of them.

The uncomfortable truth is that this stock has been in a down trend which coincided with the start of this trial and has continued ever since.

I can only speak for myself but the crass remark of "to try to make money off other people's ignorance and fear (what incredibly sad individuals they must be to try to make a living that way)." is again a blatant LIE. How dare you!

How do you describe yourself with all your positivity when the SP keeps going down? you think that makes you a better person, with a happy life, making people poorer for free?

This constant snide and repetitive personal onslaught while never ever confronting the obvious and ever increasing risk of buying into this stock is in my opinion where the harm is on these BB's.

Your post BV and I hope this reply is not deleted, is one of the most dangerous pieces of propaganda that I have read here for a long time. Its outright lies and a deliberate attempt to dismiss perfectly valid views that over the last 4 years have proved to be ACCURATE, whereas yours have only potentially caused people to buy this stock with your unsupported views of capital appreciation that have not only not come to pass, but instead have resulted in huge capital depreciation.

Awful absolutely awful. I would say be ashamed but clearly in writing such a post you have no shame.

" It is just another example of why not engaging is the best way forward imo. "

except you just did.

I get that many posts here can be frustrating to the particular reader depending on their particular view(s). But how long does a skim read take?

I find it bizzare that so many comment on a filtered post. Why? the whole point is to ignore, so why repond when you don't even know whats been said.

I get filtering Watching as an example because there is no input on AVCT, its almost always a personal dig or jibe or of no relevance, but as for the rest of us, we do at least talk about our view of AVCT. I concentrate on the money because I am not qualified to talk about the science esp. as I don't have the full picture.

It just seems odd to me that so many here can't wait to tell others that they have not read a post and not to react to it and then immediately comment on how stupid the post was....(it does make me wonder at quite the level of logical thinking takes place on this BB.)

The first hour is always a bit chaotic in my experience and also there is normally a fillip when the US opens at 2:30.

Should be a good day imo.

Gord, what a measured and kind response to such false and misleading info.

What would you response have been if someone said "Sp today 20p at close of play"?

Indeed would not the whole Board lit up?

I highlight this just to remind all here of the bias, unintentional or otherwise.