Member Info for WordSpaghetti

52m votes are ineligible for use for voting due to being lent out (they are still part of the 110mln count), not are 6m for the ones Lunn is blocking from the one who bought in November (I think they are also blocked) so from 110mln shares almost 60m are discounted. that leaves 50m.

Asked for expansion of what imminent meant, and Lunn, Stallard, etc didn't answer. Members stated accounts must be done then if an AGM is imminent. Challenged Lunn on the transparency of the RNSs "where are these shares if you aren't the benficiary" but Lunn couldn't answer "I don't know that's not how it works" so these need to be laid out prior to the AGM yes 62m doesn't know where they are going, apparently.

Couple of people were ejected from the meeting due to technical issues (The lady and her rep).

And apparently Lunn said Spaghetti was in the room and was livesteaming it :D haha. So put it this way - during a material General Meeting for PPP, the Chairman was scrolling LSE and reading what I wrote (or some brown noser was messaging him) instead of ACTUALLY doing his job and furthering PPP to make money for all shareholders.

Good to know I live in his head rent free.

RE TG group holding stuff back - it's more we know Lunn has someone in there so not everything is shared there either I should think. But I don't recall any futher Q&As apart from accounts, and multiple instances of holding the company to account. The general consensus of those who attended is:

Lunn and his Legal donkeys Stallard haven't got a clue about Companies Act - they couldn't even rebut factual statemends from members. Just to remind Lunn - ignorance is not bliss in the eyes of the law.

Delta - shares aren't recognised yet so not a TR1 - once that occurs I imagine there will be one.

Ssccss- it wasn't Lunn who bailed it (he already tried and failed to exclude the proxy votes) but was due to those members present voting to adjourn (which should give enough time for a major shareholder to get their shares recognised in time for the 'imminent' AGM).

Haha and my bad - I mean "be presented before the 1st August 2025". must be Friday...

ASI - Think gwilliams and gasman have given accurate accounts as they were both there by their own admission. strangely these two contradict with M22C's account where by admission he left half way through, appparently, including the reason for the adjournment, which is odd to say the least. So either M22C wasn't there, or is on purpose trying to muddy the waters.

Let's summarise:

1) meeting stated in a room meant for 10 people, where 7 of those people were: Menzel, Lunn, Stallard solicitor, Carrick, Westend, plus 2) and then one woman and her rep were turned away as it was full, and otherwise were an additional 14 shareholders.

2) After back and forth members voted to adjourn because Lunn didn't want to include legitimate proxy votes for the count (likely this is where we got the 93% yes based on yesterday) and in addition because the room was too small.

3) during the intermission a larger room was procured, and one shareholder asked how it is possible for another shareholder, who owns just shy of 7% of the company to not have their vote included, which was only confirmed that morning, and to that end, regardless of the proxy votes that now much be included in the vote, the vote be adjourned to the AGM.

4) there were then Q&As, one of which stated annual accounts were then 'imminent' as the audit was finalised.

This is, at least a summary of what I understood the main material facts to be.

?

But we're waiting for those exact accounts since August last year and why we are suspended.

In addition this is main market FCA and their regs are 4 months. AIM get 6 months still.

If you meant 2025 accounts then surely, given the last 3 years the suspension has occured on 1st August, surely that is evidence enough that we should also be presented the 31 March 2025 accounts before the 1st APril 2025.

ASI - people have been trying to inform everyone what actually happened in the meeting there, however it quickly gets drowned out by the trolls, or twisted by M22C (for example). Only the TG group is able to have discussion without trolls and everyone is richer for it.

I don't think Michael Carrick is going to keep his FCA regulated status after all this. I think he should read this part: https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/FCG/6/2.html

ASI - what do you mean new accounts submitted in September? No, we know from experience(!) that it's 4 months after the YE so that is 2025 accounts need to be presented before 1st August 2025 not September.

Hope so Delta

The Chevron one Lunn has (as he is the one with the password to the old website) - the info@ from Menzel is a different domain and hence a different website. Just another one of the ways that Lunn is trying to control PPP and make it look as bad as possible for his own gain.

Honestly. who labels a thread 'Anger'.

RE ASI: "Regarding the independence of adult children or spouses as shareholders, while the legal ownership of transferred shares would rest with them individually, it is crucial to consider the broader scope of regulatory disclosure requirements. Under the FCA's Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules (DTR 5), holdings are aggregated where individuals are deemed to be "acting in concert." This includes situations where parties, such as family members, cooperate on the basis of an agreement or understanding, whether formal or informal, to acquire or exercise voting rights jointly. Therefore, a mere transfer of legal title to assets does not automatically exempt the original holder from disclosure obligations if the parties involved continue to act in concert. The FCA's framework is specifically designed to ensure transparency regarding the effective control of significant shareholdings, preventing circumvention through fragmented ownership among closely associated individuals."

Essentially, we seem to all be agreed here, that Lunn must disclose all of his current and intended/known future holdings immediately, in the UK, New Zealand, and across the world. Failure to do so when the issue has already been legally highlighted to him and his legal council constitutes an ongoing criminal act.

Not sure why 'Anger' appears to be the thread. Everyone is pretty happy to be honest. Apart from a new on here. Good discussion most. onwards and upwards and to the moon etc etc etc

ASI - understood - however, we know he already has in other ways so what's one more nail in the coffin so to speak. Thanks for clear explanations

Ah thanks Delta - I missed that the executor also doesn't have to - although surely the Invictorium shares should have already been notified, for example - in addition the change in Directorship of the few companies in New Zealand nothwithstanding PetroQuest limted (the NZ incorporation where Lunn is now director) as well as York Energy (where Lunn is now a director) therefore he has finalised those sections of the probate and surely does 100% know where those shares have ended up - with him and Shaw (in that case).

As delta knows - the RNS mentions executor but also fails to mention Lunn as the beneficiary (as defined the will we have all downloaded unless anyone is too tight to pay £1.50), therefore he is already the owner of the shares and therefore has already committed market abuse by not declaring them under the umbrella of executor let alone beneficiary.

Few bevvies tonight. loverly jubberly.

Some right bottle and glass holes on here tonight. Shorters rattled. Honest PI shareholders celebrating. Lunn reading the LSE boards wasting what little he has left of life instead of chilling and taking it easy on his hard stolen millions.

Gonna get some semantic field bolognaise tonight, that's for sure!

This Coxsy12 is one of them

It isn't about proving wrong. it's about what exactly are you hoping to acheive? You want me to sell my no 4/5ths mln shares? Not happening. So what is your purpose in messaging what you are messaging?

OO is nothing to do with HUI in that sense - saying the Acqusition is not finalised sure, however all we have is some non-regulatory statement on linked in saying the preIPO was meant to complete by end of April. They obviously aren't in any rush - they secured a 4.5m contract so for sure have cash rolling in - with the preIPO so why hang on every second?

Banter is not to and fro-ing. It's basically calling you out for being a negative influence whining like a baby about the same thing day in day out. I honestly don't think you are cut out for investing so wonder why you bother - therefore the only remaining option is that you aren't currently invested and are just "highlighting out of the goodness of your heart everything negative and nothing positive" about HUI.

RNS just as soon as Lunn dries his eyes and takes his heart meds he'll start on the RNS. no doubt skipping over the fact the whole thing was illegal, that he didn't lose the votes, that the meetings wasn't adjourned to the AGM, and so on. It's going to be a work of art. Just hang in there everyone.