Member Info for Wigwammer

Another good post 86kb. On the one side the dilution and handing over rights to p140 in lupus in US reduces the per share value versus the last peak. But the positives are also compelling : p140 is now targeting the whole autoimmune space (not just lupus), there is the diagnostic element and the prospect that trial design/moa are far better understood this time around. IMO DYOR etc

You make a good point, validpoint. The dilution materially reduces the per share value. And why has peterpharma changed his name to onetomany? Has he something very embarrassing to hide?

Lollywally should take the time to go back and review his own contribution to the board over the last 18 months. Few people did more to cast doubt over this beautiful multi-bagger. Here’s to a board full of charts, price predictions and no lollywally :)

Yes, popeye. PointlessPete (onetomany/petepharma)…He is the owner and author of one of the most embarrassing and amateur collections of posts in LSE history. Trolling IMM at 2p! Hence the name change :)

Lol. It dropped for 27 seconds and finished at 12.5p, peter. You are pointless :)

“And weakening further now. Not good” said peterpharma/onetomany at 11.5p … clueless :)

Mwv1 - as I’ve just suggested, a warrant holder may be very positive on prospects but want to lock in a small amount of profit. With only 3m exercised so far, I don’t think we can logically read much in to it

Given that you ask, juxta. I built my position here mainly in 2024 at around 2p (please see my 100+ posts from 2024 documenting this). I then sold an amount to cover my original investment plus a profit between 8-10p. So yes - I have myself demonstrated that I would sell some of my position at multiples of my original investment price, just like the warrant holders may do. Doesn’t mean I am not still positive about prospects though. DYOR IMO GLA

With respect juxta, I don’t think your question makes sense. The exercise price is fixed. Do you mean would I sell them at a multiple of the exercise price?

“Logically” says toomanypeters. A man who claims 2 plus 2 equals 2 :)

Simple logic :

1) avion have been quiet all year. Shares +850% ytd… but you keep chasing that red herring :)

2) you have no idea how long it will take pharma to check the data

3) so far 3m warrants have been exercised out of a total of 98m… a pittance… question is, why haven’t more been exercised? ATB :)

“They” love it, whispers? It’s mostly one person

Yes - compare tommy25 and onetoomany posts. Same person lol :)

How do you know Avion aren’t interested in taking as much as they can? Over the last 12 months IMM has produced breakthrough data, had it verified by Jackson labs and patented by HLK. It’s probably more valuable now than ever

Probably the same poster, achilles. Another username to drown the board when peter/onetoomany hits a sticky patch :)

I agree SYN. And he has been on filter for a couple of weeks. But now and then you have to correct them, or people start giving credibility to their utter bs. ATB

The idiot is you, toomanypeters. If IMM has £100m in the bank plus a share in an asset that has just been verified as highly valuable by experts in commercial science, then of course the market value is likely to be materially ABOVE £100m… You must spend your whole life talking adamantly about things you are totally clueless about.

What a fool you are toomanypeters. In the event that a large partner stumps up £100m cash upfront to participate in p140, it can only be because they see p140 as a highly valuable asset. So IMM will have £100m cash plus a share in an asset whose value has just been verified by experts in commercial science. Unless of course, you think you know better than the pharma industry what has value? Lol :)

So peterpharma disappears (a clueless troll who posted umpteen times a day) and is replaced almost to the day by onetomany (a clueless troll who posts umpteen times a day). And when I say clueless - we are talking about a poster who stated that if IMM does a deal with £100m cash upfront then IMM’s market value should be LESS than £100m… And who stated at 5p that he had a long term 10p forecast, but now the shares have been up to 18p claims he still has a holding. Come on peter. Why have you changed your username?

Timsmith - investment is all about making the right decisions under conditions of uncertainty. By the time we have all relevant facts answered the shares will be £1+… You sound rather like peterpharma, who also didn’t understand this basic concept… “the time to buy - it’s when all the confusion about claims have been satisfactorily answered”