Member Info for Wigwammer

Jgjam - I have been building my position here for 18+ months, and have fielded dozens of questions such as yours over that time. After a while you realise the questions themselves are really just statements, born of impatience. 6-7 weeks silence and the arrival of Ketan Patel likely tells us very little about whether a deal is coming. ATB IMO etc

Over the 6 weeks or so since the shares multiplied and moved up to the new trading range, they have spent most time between 9p and 12p. We are currently at the upper end of that. So for all the crying, weeping, nashing impatience - the shares are holding up well while we wait for news. If this all seems to be taking too long for certain flip floppers, I suggest biotech investment may not be for them… GLA IMO

Where is barchid.. :) … @37p “All of those rabid bulls of MARS who delighted in puffing new punters in seem to had gone from this board.” … Clown!

Flip flop people.. they spend their whole lives pretending to make decisions, but really just waste everybody’s time. Excellent use of filter btw… IMO GLA etc

And for any flip flop clueless feck who doesn’t understand how this works… The warrants allow Lanstead to buy up to 70m shares at 2p, which can then be sold on to an institution(s) at an agreed price (likely to be at or around the current market price). The warrants are hugely in the money and could be liquidated if desired. The point is - have Lanstead chosen not to, and if so, why? IMO DYOR

MysticMike. Please read my post again. In addition to the sharing agreement, Lanstead also have 70 million warrants with an exercise price of 2p… They have the means of providing large blocks of shares to institutions, bypassing the need for the institutions to purchase in the illiquid open market. Have Lanstead chosen not to do so, and if so, why? IMO DYOR

In the event an institution is building a position here through market purchases, it is interesting that Lanstead have not been lined up as a block seller. With 70m warrants (on top of the sharing agreement shares) - and with a history of passing blocks on to third parties - Lanstead could provide the means. Have they chosen not to, and if so, why? GLA DYOR etc

Given the rise on Friday, this is a nice start :)

LOL.. the only certainty here is OTM and flip flop rog will be using lots of posts and words to tell us nothing of use whatsoever.. GLA :)

The issue with flip flop rog isn’t that he’s calling the bod out. The issue is that when IMM was 18p he was telling us it was going above 20p. When it’s 10p he’s telling us it’s going down to 8p (and clapping himself when the bid falls below 10p for 30 seconds). And now the shares have risen 27%+ on Friday he’ll be filling the board with lots more words - mainly concluding that he is right regardless of where the shares go (having not called anything right). It’s all a bit of a waste of time.. imo

Yes pebsi. It could go up or it could go down, no one really knows, according to lolly. LOL. What’s the point?! :)

27%+ up yesterday. That move will be worrying a lot of recent sellers. GLA :)

“If they want in, they’ll bid. If they don’t, they won’t… Impossible to know at this stage”… Such wisdom from lollywally - the same wordy indecisive nonsense we were getting at sub 2p. The point is - what are the payoffs to the different outcomes? At 2p they were obviously skewed to the upside, at 12p this is likely still true. Investment is about making decisions under conditions of uncertainty, not simply commentating on it. I don’t think lollywally has quite grasped this yet. IMO GL Immers

Thank you for conceding bonneville, that your comments at 1.5p were dumb. Consequently, people should take what you say with a large dose of salt… And no, even if IMM shares fall to zero I will still be in profit on IMM having locked in my original investment size (as stated in previous posts).. ATB

Not at all bonneville. All it has served to do is remind everyone that a top tier agency has processed the patent application (and that at 1.5p you were saying some very dumb things indeed). ATB

Bonneville - the patent application has been processed through HLK - a top tier patent agency. Argue with them… And what my previous post does prove is that you will happily barrage the board with scattergun negatives that prove neither to be accurate or prescient

Please bear in mind that bonneville is primarily a negative vibe machine. Here is what he had to say at 1.5p, and pity anyone who acted on it and sold… “

I agree with Wigwammer et al that a successful patent completion would be a big plus for the share price. In fact it would be transformational , because the market clearly believes there is nothing being patented. As I do myself. There has been one ( failed) P3 trial and then silence. No more trials. So what is there to patent?. The average time for a completed patent is three years and we must now be at the wrong end of that. There is an issue of trust here and it ain’t looking good. And as for the independent directors, one of their roles is liaison between the board and the shareholders. Anyone seen any evidence of that?”

INC. AQ … remember it’s listed on the acquis exchange… It’s just a thought and please don’t take it as investment advice. Very high risk obviously. The two stories are historically linked, and there is no love for INC right now. But perceptions can change… IMO DYOR GLA etc

But I wonder if incanthera is worth another look down here? In the event IMM do receive a material payment upfront, it is reasonable to believe that a small amount may go over there to tide them over. Have bought a smidge … Please DYOR Good luck all IMMers!

From ANGS board. The guy is a saddo and needs to get help. “Well, despite Onetomany's eternal compulsion to offer up ridiculously unrealistic predictions and "jam tomorrow" assurances (none of which, as cold hard reality has proven time and again, have ever been remotely accurate), and despite his utterly unsuccessful attempts to ramp this stock...maybe in the face of such unbroken and crashing failures, he can take some comfort in the possibility that God does indeed love a trier.”