Member Info for Wigwammer

So management have confirmed there is no need for any near term cash raise. And we all acknowledge the patent issue has been discussed over and over again - it’s in the public domain… So the only thing being dismissed/dispatched/buried is juxta’s credibility. RIP…. Please DYOR IMO GLA

What encourages me is that the average punter cares more about what Sebastien called the discovery, than they do the point that he couldn’t believe how good the results were (consequently verified by Jackson labs).

Dear msuk. Tea leaves are also there in black and white. But so what? There is no proof they have anything to do with the future direction of share prices either. IMO GLA

Poor juxta just keeps giving himself away. Like a scared rabbit he appears here deramping on a Saturday afternoon, because he has sold and is evidently worried about missing out. And he includes me in his latest post because I got inside his head earlier and it’s been bothering him all afternoon… Dear boy - I couldn’t give two hoots if you’ve made tuppence here. Nor have I ever suggested otherwise. In the meantime, cash runway to H2 26/27.. ATB :)

Have been saying for 18+ months that lolly is a wally. So it is very satisfying to see him repeatedly, publicly and incontrovertibly making a total t1t out of himself… GLA :)

Thank you for conceding, juxta, that the warrants would bring in another £1.4m and stretch the cash runway into 2027. And I’ll leave others to ponder whether the 14% dilution (which is already in the public domain) or multi billion usd opportunity on the other side is of greater consideration. Now what was bothering you so much on Saturday afternoon that you found yourself here of all places? Have you sold out recently by any chance? :) … IMO DYOR etc

It’s also a fact that exercising the warrants would bring in another £1.4m, stretching the cash runway into 2027, juxta. And the market is fully aware of them. What was bothering you so much that you were here deramping on a Saturday afternoon? Very odd… DYOR etc

Well lollywally probably doesn’t have that much to topslice, having missed the lows. Unfortunately he spent most of that time making poorly judged posts too.. In his own words: 11th September 2025 - "In terms of IMM, for anyone bothering to read this post, I fully admit I called things completely wrong here. I didn't see a prolonged SP uplift simply from a patent being registered. And I didn't believe Tim's "year of the deal" message"

Hmm. Why does a company with 95m shares and warrants sell 10m shares after a 400%+ rise, and when they need cash to pay their obligation to IMM? Only a person entirely bereft of any understanding of sensible risk management would spend a lot of time pondering this. IMO GLA DYOR

Fair enough to comment on a Tuesday morning after an RNS, juxta… Rather more telling to be caught deramping on a Saturday afternoon… LOL :)

Lanstead own 70m warrants which they could have exercised - buying shares at 2p and selling them at 10p+. But they have exercised and sold none. Now why might that be… GLA DYOR IMO etc

18 months on and lollywally still doesn’t understand the Lanstead agreement. LOL … IMO DYOR :)

It’s nice when they make it really easy. No knowledge. No humour. No personality. Probably why they’re here. GLA

That’s a silly post J Kemp that doesn’t warrant a response. Another weirdo for the filter bin. IMO GLA

No JK. What i see is that Lanstead crossed the 3% mark yesterday and so they informed the market. This corresponds with a selling process that has been consistent since the sharing agreement was started many months ago. Perhaps you weren’t aware of this.

JK - Lanstead own 70m warrants at 2p, and sell mechanically as part of the sharing agreement. Better to educate new investors then, than consolidate misplaced fears as you have just done. IMO DYOR etc

If people have made hundreds of percent here then it makes sense to take some off the table, and people should position size according to what they can afford . I have taken some off the table myself as stated in previous posts... But two important points : 1) the shares were probably too low 12-18 months ago to begin with .. and 2)) they have risen for pretty good reason - new technology with data verified by Jackson labs, new patent application through HLK, engaged with a number of interested parties, better funding etc… The story has moved on… IMO DYOR not advice etc

Re phase 3 success probabilities. The key point is the asymmetry of outcomes to each event. The maximum you can lose here is 100% of your investment in the event p140 fails. By contrast, if p140 works in trial then the reward could be many multiples of 1000%… 100% vs multiples of 1000%… That’s nice risk/reward IMO… Anyway, deals first… IMO GLA

The reaction to lolly and rog is entirely understandable. Every post tells us more about them than about IMM. They own the shares but are dogmatically negative. The only position they fervently defend therefore is that they can NEVER be wrong, because they never actually commit to a view… People who are never wrong (despite never getting anything right) - you gotta love ‘em! Lolly has been doing the same for 18+ months. A commentator. It’s pointless.. IMO GLA

I get why overexcited stock holders post on a Saturday afternoon. But derampers? That’s an interesting and unusual thing … IMO GLA