Member Info for Wigwammer

How does an institution get a holding in Immupharma without additional share issuance (beyond existing warrants)? Well a simple option is to buy shares/warrants off Lanstead (which I believe happened during the first ph3). ATB

Totally with you vikR. He should be banned

Morri - with respect, I don’t think either lollywally or nolupus were balanced posters. And even if they were, what use was balance at sub 2p, when the shares were about to rise 500%?! Anyone can be balanced, but it takes ability to make a correct decision … imo gla

Yes lollywally dismissed the bulls at sub 2p as a fanclub as well. And look what happened after that? Don’t let the dullards get you down. Lollywally is neither capable of effective analysis, making a decision or learning from his mistakes. Good luck IMMErs IMO etc..

Lol. Msuk will give you clear and objective answers to all those questions. Of course, the answers will most likely be wrong as they are based on an approach with no empirical research to support it, but hey ho.. GLA IMMers. IMO etc

a little reality on the barchid/fairdealer clown show. both these two held in the £1+ level for the dividend, entirely ignoring the debt risk until after the shares floundered. they were still negative at the lows 26-30p when i engaged them. the reason there hasn’t been much commentary from the bulls is because there hasn’t been much news to comment on, not something that matters if you’re one of life’s gob****es, evidently. good results today, and nicely on course despite overlaboured concerns about headwinds… gla imo etc

Yes NCTrade - msuk’s call was very poor, trapping people out below 10p. He also posted the following wisdom “ Tip for the day..trade what you see ...not what you think you want to see”.. but it is quite obvious our resident chartist only sees what he wants to see. The point that it is unemotional and objective is irrelevant if it doesn’t help predict anything!

i have been regularly posting over the last 18 months and have had to put up with lollywally that whole time. the guy sees a risk in everything, and nearly all of it has proven to be total bull****e. at its worst, good posters with interesting information left the board because they couldn’t put up with his dullness. he is a commentator, not a good decision maker. imo.good luck all immers… ps i thought lolly committed not to post anymore - another load of bull****e

Msuk - and I am observing what I see. You spent days “educating” people and being negative about the stock sub 10p bid, and then AFTER it jumps 30% intraday you then change your mind. What possible use is that to anyone?! Anybody who acted on your negativity sub 10p is now locked out

When you understand why onetoomanypeters posts, it is easy to filter him. In 2024 we had lordlollywally filling a similar role. The trouble is even when they are proven wrong, they hang around like a bad stink pretending to have called things correctly. Best filtered IMO

So msuk is now talking about “bullish reversals”?! Let’s remember that our chart hero has just spent days encouraging people to think negatively below 10p. Anyone who acted on this is now trapped out, unless they want to pay a 30%+ premium to reverse their trade. Pointless… Understand the fundamentals and valuation and be patient… IMO GLA DYOR

Jeez. Ask price now above 11p… pity anyone who acted on msuk’s posts and sold in the dip. Charting doh!

So now the shares have recovered, msuk is telling us he closed his short positoon this morning?! Doh.. anyone can do good post event trades. That doesn’t require any ability at all. lol :)

So anyone who got suckered into the charting negativity has basically been locked out. Nice one. Where is the empirical proof it works? Still can’t find any

Thanks. So fractal trading (or at least this version) is based around a strategy that identifies repeating patterns within price data. Ok. So we create an algorithm that identifies these price patterns and purchases stocks appropriately. We can then run this algorithm against historic data see if it successfully picks outperforming stocks…. Child’s play to the average quant desk… But don’t you think if it was that simple and it worked, the empirical proof would be easy to find? It isn’t…

“Prices are fractal”… I’ve heard this before. I don’t even think most chartists know what it means. I think it’s basically - it’s so complex that it simply cannot be comprehended except as an art. But it really isn’t. Take the largest exchange in the world - the US stock market. So around 1000 stocks, circa 250 price observations a year, going back circa 50 years. Thats just 12.5m data points summarising a detailed price history of the whole US market. Peanuts to a modern microprocessor. If there were repeating patterns in that dataset it would find them in seconds. But there isn’t. ATB

Price and volume data is available across thousands of stocks, dozens of markets, going back many decades… It is easy to design an algorithm which can capture and backtest any “charting strategy” imaginable. So if it really worked - if it really captured exploitable human habits - there would be evidence to prove it. But there isn’t! IMO GLA imho

Price and volume data is widely available for thousands of stocks, over dozens of markets across decades of time. If you could really use such simple data to predict the future of stock prices, then it would be a very easy thing to prove using a simple algorithm. There would be books and books written on the subject and every investment bank in the world would be doing it, until the net gains are competed away. But I have yet to see this book. There is some evidence of long term trend reversal (over 3-5 years underperforming stocks tend to outperform). And some evidence of serial correlation over one year (stocks that do well over one year tend to do well the following year). But the evidence is pretty weak and gets even worse when risk adjusted. The typical response to this sort of conclusion from chartists is that charting is an art (no - charts are just visual depictions of data) and/or that there is a mythical book that proves it all works and that I just haven’t found a copy yet (right next to gizmo in a small antique shop somewhere). Anyway, to each their own, but people are right to ask for proof. Valuation and behavioural finance are more my thing (where there is abundant proof). IMO GLA DYOR etc

And btw, I’ve had him on filter for most of the last 3 weeks. It’s easy to ignore him when you accept who he is, and why he trolls here . Have a great weekend all :)

Onetomany is peterpharma. And it’s fun laughing at him. First, the abject investment calls. Second, the bleedin’ obvious name change with no intelligence applied at disguise. Third, the familiar and poorly disguised attempts to deramp… Bur the thing that most defines him is the abject lack of humour. There is no personality there. I listen to him, and I immediately want to do the opposite - and I repeatedly have! And profited hugely! Surely that has to mark a failed troll - you feel an immediate need to do the exact opposite to what he (not very skilfully) suggests :)