Member Info for Whiskyman01

The 3 way contract between QED/Cargill/MSC is the trigger for LONO prep to start in earnest I’d say.

Its you who doesn`t tolerate others views Vince, yet you spin it as if you`re being stifled. People can read, you are the one who sneered at others positive views because they were more positive than yours, you are the one who started this sorry series of posts, yet as always come the end claim your the victim, same old performance time after time. You know that of course, you repeat this cycle every 4 weeks or so, Vince-struation possibly.

Nobody poured cold water on your opinions, not one single person. You were the one being judgemental referring to positive comments as coming from the “glass half full brigade”.

Cue Vince the Victim speech, freedom of speech garbage. Nobody has ever stopped you speaking, you do it freely whilst insulting others. Don’t be surprised when they respond.

I actually think you enjoy the attention Vince, something perverse about you, you like being the “victim”. It’s maybe why you watch GB news all day every day!

Vince thinks he’s clever, that’s obviously a mistake. This mastermind has worked out I may be a member of another forum, and?

You have shown yourself consistently to be a miserable, whining “pseudo realist” glass half empty person. You’re not, as you claim, a realist. You’re just miserable and unable to contain that misery to the point you feel the need to splurge it onto this board and other boards when you had the chance.

Three weeks ago you came on this board all contrite and acknowledged the benefit of Cargill etc, today? Anyone who purports to share any view other than said misery is “one of the half glass full” brigade. Do you have any sense of what a misery guts that makes you sound? I’d rather try to find the positives in life and fail than spend it like you, condemning others for feeling something you’re incapable of.

Exactly. It’s a wonderful time to be a new investor in QED, not so great if you’ve been here for 10 + years but at least there’s a good route to success, albeit belated.

Would also help if he read the posts a little better. Nobody mentioned the “end of 2025”, detail matters oh

Miserable one.

If we get to year end with the LONO underway and Morocco signed up for commercial supply to site B, the funding issues will also have been resolved one way or another. Assuming we are not diluted out the game, which I very much doubt, we should be looking ahead to 2025 with confidence. Interim LONO not far away, additional Morocco sites trialled and converting to MSAR, and one or two other areas with potential.

This was always the hard part, getting through the process of signing agreements. The odds are stacked in favour of them coming soon, but until they do its only natural that uncertainty fills the void.

To deny the success of Goodfuels is to deny the obvious, good on them getting their technology to market. I do think the hurdles each company faces to get their tech accepted is not readily comparable. Producing, bunkering and approving an emulsion fuel from scratch is way more complex than the Good fuels process so I`d expect them to have a better chance of quick success than we`ve had.

You also cannot ignore the performance of key personnel within the companies. How well have the key team members performed? I don`t think its simply a case of saying Goodfuels have made it to market and we haven't therefore they are better. Again its more complex than that. The main reason QFI, as it was, failed to get where Goodfuels are now, is mainly due to one company....Maersk. They made a fateful decision that turned out to be wrong and the minnow company, us, paid a heavy price. Just imagine where wed be now if they`d followed through to LONO?

I won`t mention KSA as it`s the same story. Had either of these come to fruition the QED team would be lauded as heroes and we`d all be much wealthier now. Thereafter, QFI got lost for a time trying to find a new direction and suitable markets elsewhere, but with little success it has to be said. Was that due to bad management or trying to sell your concept into a stubborn conservative market? Probably a bit of both tbh. The good news is that we did find another way forward.

Goodfuels should be applauded for their success. They are laying the groundwork for the use of water in commercial marine fuels. That has to help our prospects longer term.

There`s loads of space for the two companies to work side by side in the marine sector. Longer term, the QED emulsion platform will be much more versatile than its competitors also more financially beneficial to end users and the environment. With the above in mind, it should be market forces that eventually dictate the path marine fuel users take. I am hopeful and quietly confident the QED tortoise will eventually pass the hare, but each will find its place in the market.

Wasn’t wrong was I?

Standby for the hat-trick…..

Funding and news of project agreements. They each have a huge drag on any buying interest due to uncertainty. Both will be resolved shortly I`m sure, hopefully with minimal shareholder dilution. Thereafter, a fully funded QED with all LONO agreements in place should increase in value as potential buyers realise the risk level has dropped substantially from where it is now. MSC and Cargill are in it for the financial potential and the environmental kudos emulsion fuels will bring to their respective companies. It`s a matter then for QED to deliver on the promise they`ve shown investors over the years.

“He wasn’t replying to you he was replying to the other Brian.”

Exactly Wodewick. If only Brian were here to speak for himself…..

Well, you would know exactly who Brian is.

Go back to your basement Brian.

Theres been an understandable assumption that we were waiting for a “LONO agreement”, when in fact project LONO is a collective of agreements between different parties and groups of parties. There is no single LONO agreement. It will proceed when all are signed, which means we are progressing at the pace of the slowest.

Cargill/MSC are in this for the long term so for them it’s not an issue waiting a few extra months. For us, it’s like torture, but once agreed, I think it will be the start of a very long and prosperous journey.

No doubt sick chick will claim he didn’t bother reading the report when it comes. How can you impart knowledge to someone who knows it all.

Funny how your vocabulary and writing skills improve suddenly Piggy. You forget for a moment?

How does he manage to read all these filtered posts?

As usual stock cheque goes crying to the mods when his ramping garbage is pointed out.

Missing December and still waiting heading for mid February would be classed as a “wide” in cricket. It’s the fact it happens every time they suggest a timeframe. There’s a limit to how many times you can blame other parties for feeding you duff info.