Member Info for Whiskyman01

Nothing like a bit of revisionism to warm the heart on a cold Saturday evening.

Oh dear, I guess we’ve got him wrong all these years, darn!!

“Nobody is interested in how YOU invest or YOUR beliefs, this is NOT about YOU, when will get get your head around that???”

Speak for yourself StoppedClock, others are capable of doing likewise. The irony of your “not about you” lecture is bordering on surreal.

“Hermant was a wste of space at Quadrise and was an extra cost we did not need as David was running the finance dept.”

He helped set the company up and finance it during some difficult years, so “waste of space” seems more apt to describe you than him HF14.

If he did make that post, then it’s an error of judgement to say the least and unprofessional. Whatever gripes he had/has with the company, a post like that on LinkedIn is not the way to express them, especially now.

“In YOUR opinion.”

Do you think Sticky understands irony?

According to the StoppedClock the ii’s have been buying this share since the agm, all the way up to 8p. Remember his after market report on the late trades? “ ii’s buying in”. They were obviously too stupid to realise a discounted placing was coming, or as is much more likely, it wasn’t ii’s at all.

Stocky reinvents himself on a weekly basis. “They don’t need the extra money” to “I told you so, now they can invest…bla bla. I guess he just needs someone, anyone, to listen to him.

Yes, good news. Get on now and deliver the projects.

“Good spot Dustof so it was answered. ”

Amazing what happens if you actually read what you comment upon.

MSAR supply to MSC from the Med is looking like a strong possibility now. Why would MSC bother to negotiate with QED and refiners if they didn’t intend to use MSAR? They wouldn’t, so it seems the MSAR PoC is the major hurdle to cross. Fortunately, we’ve done that before on this vessel so it will work fine, just comes down to economics and environmental benefits over conventional fuels. Looking like some huge stories will unfold this year.

This, from the same guy who shouted in big caps that Quadrise didn’t NEED to do a fund raise and it certainly wouldn’t be 3 or 4p as some were suggesting. He was so certain that he rubbished every other opinion on the matter.

He also quotes Jason’s timelines as if they’re certainties, forgetting of course that normal humans have something called memory!

He is what he is and will never change, mainly because, like all narcissists, he knows he’s right on everything.

Since when is £2m in cash irrelevant to QED, anyone? Stocky comes out with some gibberish does he not.

Time for a new keyboard and a fresh pizza margherita !

Must be what he meant when he said he had plenty of dough.

“With MSAR not waiting for LONO, that means commercial revenues from MSC could start way before the bioMSAR LONO is completed.”

The above is just garbage ramping. MSAR cannot be and will not be available from the Med until after contracts are signed for OCP (likely Q2) and then at least 6-9 months obtaining permits and engineering works even if it is back at Cepsa. They can’t just plug back in as Mr Rampy claims.

Work it out, it’s not even possible even if they hit ALL their published timelines.

“Think this is what SC has been referring numerous times..”

Yes numerous times, on a subject that was well covered at the agm and in every communication since. They intend to supply msar commercially to MSC and others from a Med refinery….assuming they can sign agreements. Nothing to do with Stockcheque and more to do with posters short memories or lack of attention.

He asked us to get this out on the BBs.

"Bookbuild have been lobbying non-participating brokers such as Barclays and iWeb that they should be letting shareholders participate.

Could you please contact the bookbuild team on support@bookbuild.live, then they can then speak to the people they know at Barclays and iWeb."

Jason’s own words are best used to work out revenue. He said a single MMU could supply 15 ships (minimum) and that 2 MMU would bring the company to break even. Today we were told it costs £3m per annum to run Quadrise. Even if you say £4m to run Quadrise, break even is a minimum of 30 ships, @ £133k income per ship.

A narcissist is never wrong.

I prefer Sloppi’s chart.

Must be time for your afternoon meds Stocky, is that nurse at the door?