Member Info for wealdpwr

Isn't the Technical Director more than an employee - isn't he also on the BOD? Worrying indeed.

YinYang

You said, "Andrew Hollis was probably the man who decided not to flow test and he should be the one to explain why he didn't think it was worth it. " Like all of your posts, this is pure conjecture without any basis in known fact. " Perhaps if you took a balanced view ( which is not your modus operandi ) you would see that your constant ramping is pointless - unless someone is paying you.

I'm amused at some on here who proselytise that Lord Lucan is doing a good job for the company ...yet they can't answer the question, why is he partnering with JTP given his past misdeeds?

What about your own ramping based on nothing? It is a bit disingenuous.

Agreed, well said. Give the risk/return, that is why management is so important. When the MD and entire Board leave a company and the ex Chairman that violates FCA regs is left shadow directing and the new MD is not independent, if bells don't go off in your head and you stick with it...you get the return you deserve.

Huh? My comments were directed at Wolf, not yourself. It must be hard to read your laptop inside the tent. And as I said, Wolf unlike you was correct on the facts. You clearly are not , including your Vonk dreams. Now run along and jump on top of something so you can stick it to the man and receive benefits.

Wolf

We were right the whole time based on the facts.

I will not apologize to JA51 who is simply a n idelogical swampy -who got lucky. Things could have gone the other way.

Cheers

nhawan , the value of your management team is zero. It too has a value. Now do the maths.

KenniGT , if you worked for me , you would be made redundant for spending all of your time trying to moderate this BB. However, you are spending all of your time and being paid to ramp ANGS on this BB. The one thing you don't have, make it two...are facts + oil. Maybe not yet you will say....Revert to the facts...pure entertainment, long live ANGS.

GLA

gmed/Charlie

Shareholders should ask whether if he was so ignorant, why did he go all the way to America to take the loan - as no company in the UK would do it ? IMO, I never thought ignorance of the FCA is an excuse for the Chairman of a public company.

Harts

Taking a 'loan' on your shares as a company officer is against FCA regulation, shorting his shares is against most if not all standard corporate governance / bi-laws, here in the UK ( prob against FCA regs too) .... If Tom Winnifrith is correct, he took a loan. Whether he shorted or took a loan - in this case, a loan - he was dealing from the bottom of the deck with shareholders. IMO it is a serious cloud.

Captain Stanley,

Cheers. Time will tell. Further to my point, i would expect Lord Lucan to take full credit for Balcombe even though it was Vonk's deal - standard play. Agreed on Brockham. I'm less enthusiastic about Saltfleeby as an asset delivering to LTHs. Given the company's expenses ( including a nice yearly pkg for Tidswell), it would have to be gloriously prodigious for it to deliver on the promise. IMO, the best case scenario is that it is productive enough to keep lights on until they can come up with a better plan / fund Balcombe.

Captain Stanley ...

Respectfully disagree..

Firstly Lord Lucan is serving his own interests and obviously reading these boards...Any competent person would know that the boards, deliberately take 'turn on tap' comments out of context for their own purposes. And to suggest it caused some dislocation in the market / share price is ludicrous. .... Obviously they turned on the taps and they got water/nothing. No one said it would , without any doubt produce oil, my recollection is that it described the work required at the time..

...Just bc Lord Lucan is more measured and paternalistic, it doesn't mean he is more trustworthy. Has he explained why the company took on more risk w Lidsey and paid Lenigas? Why did Leningas have to be paid if they are all partners?

And, he stated in the Annual Report " Following Jonathan Tidswell-Pretorius’s share dealing and resignation from the board the Company has initiated its own investigation into the matter which has drawn on too long. The investigation is still ongoing, under my supervision, and we aim to bring this matter to a rapid conclusion with an RNS release before the AGM." That never happened either...

All LTH should tread carefully with this new arrangement, same team - albeit entertaining.

GLA

No you're not. A rationale sentiment held by rationale thinkers ( neither ramping or deramping) when investing hard earned money.

Didn't we just pay DL 2mil shares? Seems that he prefers UKOG and not that interested in ANGs...related or not to ANGS, IMO DL tweets smell.

Not one to, nor should you, trust DL....His story is suspect and withdrawn from the Weald? I think he knows more than he is saying. Nor do i think this bodes well for ANGS:

https://twitter.com/DavidLenigas/status/1141266724588838912

GLA

It is the same team.

GLA

MIrasol, cheers. There are all types of market manipulation. ANGS has done a suspicious buyout of DL's private Lidsey interest as an example. JTP has demonstrated he has no integrity through his arguable deceit more than once. And there are your garden variety MMs either supporting the share or their client. Some PIs are susceptible to cries of news and sentiment and things will just turn around - ramped by either MMs or the Company. But the lack of competence, integrity and cash producing assets show this company isn't worth much but 3p on the AIM! It is 3p for entertainment value only and that's fine with me. I would have called this investible last year but sadly no longer....

Crocqman, in essence what you're saying is if you filter out all of the noise, the price reflects current management's inability to perform. Further, all of the selling is due to a lack of confidence in the future of the company. Therefore stop looking for excuses when the answer is plain as day? And oh yes, management knows this too, so they will line their pockets here and there as long as they can. I think you are asking us, is it the regulators or Angs? It looks like , you are saying Angs. The probability is you are correct.

Perhaps JTP tweets were for his own pump and dump?