Member Info for wealdpwr

YL
I understand the sentiment but do not think this will accomplish your goal. First off Lord Lucan is already incentivised w options. By forcing this alignment, he would have to both sell ( to raise personal cash) and never have to reach into his pocket - unfortunately he will still not be aligned with shareholder's interests to any greater certainty. And if he is not made liquid, there is no reason for him to have a job. The brass tax is this is is not about compensation , it is about performance .

What about the sweet business development package? YL , what did you do with yours? LOL

Tut... tut.. tut, Charlie London. Your over reaction is quite telling. You may also want to look up the usage of 'rose colored glasses' and for that matter, 'conspiracy'. In the meantime, I'll just analyse the facts which tend to make you uncomfortable and prolific, did I detect a little spittle too? Carry on, Mate.

GLA

GLA

Charlie London

I’m shocked at the speed and access you were able to operate at - not to mention your enthusiasm. Seems like it is one team ( why would the Nomad be so accommodating to you without doing any of their own DD? ) ...The only answer I can muster is that you may be ramping for Angs - imo.

Charlie London

It is not by association, it is a business relationship, as supported by the facts. It is does not bode well for the company as itit is a continuum of the core problem w Angs. Giving more of the same a chance doesn’t seem rational. As someone mentioned here , this Knowe/JDA mystery remains another factor , that all is the same.

Charlie London

Re your view of the mess. Lord Lucan said Vonk ended up in a disagreement with shareholders towards end of 2018, wasn’t able to come to market with regular fundraise and so raised unsatisfactory convertible loan note. He failed to mention , the elephant in the room, that it was one shareholder and that was the requisition by JTP.

Before JTP was removed from the Board, the board consisted of I think, 5 directors. It appears all left except for 1 during JTP's requisition.

Lastly, every document brought forward by the Swampy's re Brockham and permission, had one name on it, JTP...

Not sure what blame you are referring to, I didn't blame Lord Lucan for anything. However his lack of action is telling , as his association with JTP, per the requisition, per his own statements. I will refer you to YL's comment regarding this relationship, which I stated I agree with.

GLA

Cheers

CharlieLondon

You have made a point of defending Lord Lucan ever since you joined this BB. You stated with empathy, "he was dealt a complete mess"...That mess was the resignation of Board Members due to JTP's requisition. What other 'mess' are you referring to? Given JTP has been the source of this mess and other serious 'messes' , how has Lord Lucan dealt with it? He has given JTP his full confidence and a new title. Your views are contradictory. I agree with YL.

Only rampers believe, there is an old v new management. The facts are it is the same. Lord Lucan was brought in by JTP as part of his requisition . The old Board resigned in the very same time period. Everything is the same, technical, finance and largest individual shareholder. If Lord Lucan can do more than keep the lights on, w Saltfleetby, good for all. He was given Balcombe. ....

Let’s see what he can do. IMO , he has not separated himself from JTP , quite the opposite which indicates nothing has changed.

GLA

YL

Do you think GL will do so? He is only the ‘interim’ MD.

Oktane

I don't understand your comment. You belong to a chorus that ramps and says all will get better now with competent management in place. And this gem from your keyboard, " nothing happening suggest newfound management excellence."

Firstly it is the same team / same management. Would you tell us more about GL's O&G experience? And his prior success in O&G?

Assumably, he is an intelligent man but let's see something from ANGS that actually benefits shareholders. Satfleeby will keep the lights on. Balcombe /Lidsey are the old/same management and far off.

The question is has GL rid himself of JTP , the catalyst of every single mess? ANGS/GL constantly gloss over it. One day you may have facts to ramp with, but not anytime soon.

GLA

Interesting , how well you understand the risks after 4 posts! Perhaps you have been here before? At someone's behest?
BTW speaking of risks, does anyone know where the 9 Million options for 'employees' and 'consultants' are going? I bet 3.1 million are going to JTP's pocket. ANGS = pure entertainment. Risks are not even a factor anymore.....the term only applies to real investments.

Yorkshire Life

Curious whether you really think JTP is kicked out for good?

Still the largest individual shareholder and won't he receive salary / expenses ( lifestyle) in his new Business Development position? I just think this is yet again another layer of protection from the unclear investigation to full confidence by Lord Lucan on the CC and now this business development 'thing'....yet we still do not understand his role or compensation. Where will they get the money for his so called 'business development projects? Dilution?

Looks like Yanis is back on his meds.

Agreed ! Lol.

Agree w Yorkshire Life. Disappointing that there is no mention of JTP paying back his company loan or details of new compensation. Seems JTP still on the team, if not still in control. . . Throughout all these shenanigans JTP has put someone else up front and led from the rear . Putting him back further from shareholders is just gloss. Why won’t Lord Lucan be done with him?

Doom and gloom ? Vez 63 , a close reading of your post shows you are talking out of the both sides of your mouth. You recognize JTP being allegedly sidelined as a good thing...yet you say up until; the gloom is mere peddling. How can it be both? The largest individual shareholder was lining his p]\ockets, lying to shareholders, causing distresses to the company's borrowing abilities (per Lord Lucan) and you think it wasn't that, it was just negativity ? Wake up. The question is whether this is gloss ? Lord Lucan fully backed JTP on the CC last week. I think you are confusing doom and gloom with insulted intelligence.

Adam 07

If this is such a great buy for optimists and new money, why would you need to be on here touting this tomfoolery? Or putting others down?

ANGS is pure entertainment, so I don't begrudge you for your bet and playing on this BB. You will keep attracting the naysayers with all of your descriptive, faux market speak and blue sky hype of a tenuous business case ( to be generous). The optimism , ramping, call it what you will is simply nonsense based on error ridden rationale and the facts.

Angus is not an investable asset. Today's call proved it.

Where is the RNS? Remember what Lord Lucan stated in the Annual Report, " Following Jonathan Tidswell-Pretorius’s share dealing and resignation from the board the Company has initiated its own investigation into the matter which has drawn on too long. The investigation is still ongoing, under my supervision, and we aim to bring this matter to a rapid conclusion with an RNS release before the AGM."

GLA

Charlie London

I never mentioned Mr Vonk, you and other rampers. did to somehow explain the vapor. Similarly you keep saying this is new management and it is a new day, fresh beginnings. Obviously not , JTP , AH etc, the same old management whilst Lord Lucan defends JTP - his major shareholder. Why? Probably doesn’t want JTP to file another requisition as he needs a job.

Not at all. But rampers such at yourself look for excuse after excuse to justify vapor. And are you saying , it is ok for investors to be lied to?

Big Bear 2
THat's nonsense...they had permission for a 7 Day well test at Balcombe, that's it. Anyone who knows planning , would know that any new activities would have to be submitted again to the relevant agencies....No company has that kind of optionality. Sigh.