Member Info for wealdpwr

Umm, has Shell ever announced an agreement with ANGS? Or has ANGS only announced such a proposal? This is akin to offering to sell diamonds in Hatton Garden. The shopkeeper assures his customer he is interested if he has the merchandise. And tells him come back , we'll talk when you do. Does ANGS have any merchandise? No. Is it a real agreement? No. It is certainly a welcomed possibility but me think Shell is not exactly waiting for the Lord Lucan and his disciples of rampage. Announcing the possibility months if years ahead smacks of a real "Shell" game. This company is a folly. We need solid O&G companies in the UK, not this 3 year old, negative return, board lifestyle, muppet show. Invest in Shell,w/ a nice dividend, if you want to be their business partner.

Am I reading this prognosis correctly? A plausible scenario where ANGS warrant holders will exercise their 1.2p warrants , out of the money at 1.0p? Where sub 1p is old school thinking by the herd?

Why would anyone exercise options out of the money?

The ‘lazy’ herd mate is convinced by the overwhelming fact base this company is mismanaged by sub competence , a compliant BOD w questionable leadership , the greed of major shareholders unbalanced by zero revenue, no profit and serial ramptastic forecasting that never hits the mark , not even close. I think you will find the “ lazy sub 1p.,,,herd” in Chiswick or wherever they roam, not in the share price.

JD Nau

You seem to be an expert on foolish and incompetence. Thank you for sharing your hypothesis on Aleph and what they believe. Whilst you do not know what they believe, you made a case that Aleph may recover their loan. However, what about ordinary shareholders? It is missing for a reason, there is no case. Punters will lose given the company has too much debt, lacklustre management and no return on invested cash.

For all the complaining about the 'negative' posters, I suggest the rampers match each negative comment with a FACT. Let's starts with ROIC, ROE, YTD Share growth, Share growth in 2021, share growth in 2020. Amount of cash invested in ANGS by board members , amount of cash invested by the major shareholder JTP. Those are just some immediate numbers that come to mind.

The only indignity you suffer is either your dashed hopes every time you ramp this sub 1p mess or the lack of results from paid rampers.

Move on from blaming everyone under the sun , especially on this BB and focus on management. They are the only ones who can save this sinking ship. Looking at the facts, the only progress they have made is to increase corporate debt.

If you want a more positive crowd, why don't you go buy shares in another company and leave this BB? It just isn't your mandate.

Employees not investors forgive and forget. They also ignore simple finance, specifically the asset value is being sucked out by the lenders. There is no cash flow to provide return to investors . The only way Lord Lucan can make money is to churn his and Paddy's cheap options and collect a salary. No reason why they should invest any more in ANGUS. Unless they want to fool the markets....again.

Employee Memo

Remarkable today
About 3-5x aliases are operating across LSE and Advfn determined to keep a negative tone on Angus Energy
There is no Placement as my instruments analysis has concluded (in my opinion)
The drop from 1.05p to 0.85p recently looks like and smells like a seller who needed out quickly assisted by Shorting.
Also the concerted effort to discredit me on LSE ADVFN Twitter can only mean certain groups are in a nervous position.

I respect the new CEO
I forgive the 1 year delay
I expect £12m to be spent in getting to First Gas
It may not be plain sailing but the push by Angus to look at Geothermal onsite at Saltfleeby is even more reason to be positive.

GLA WTFDIK

Shorters/Derampers nervous to know whos hands 10-25m have gone to hahahaha ;)

Well, positive news , certainly helps Postalot and his salary. However , I found nowhere in the RNS how this is positive for for ordinary, retail investors. In fact, it is not , RI's are the last in the pecking order to benefit from this deal. Secondly, this is quite the word hedge in the first paragraph of the RNS:

"conditional only on the setting of the hedge, regulatory approval of the royalty arrangement by the Oil and Gas Authority (the "OGA") and a handful of administrative provisions,"

Usually when companies announce a deal , it is completed. But this is ANGS.

For RI's , Caveat Emptor.

My favorite quote from Postalot, "Not sure the market has yet taken on board the revenue and cash flow implications of the indications"

The "implication of the indications" ? Really? Whatever that means. The real facts are indicative of a sub 1p company. Unfortunately it is going nowhere.

I wonder what Lord Lucan thought the implication of the indications were when JTP swept out the board after being demoted for America 2030?

I’m sorry to say that the musings of a ‘new’ poster with ‘ objective’ views, who has been ‘following ‘ the company as an ‘investor’ , now targeting negative opinions of ANGS is the oldest ploy in the Angs/flagstaff/MM playbook. Lads how many times have we seen this before? It usually happens when there is a lull in company ‘news’ as the realists reappear after organized ramping and targeting of those who discuss facts. A lot of discussion of the company’s poor performance under Lord Lucan has clearly gotten on someone’s nerves. Again.

One man's doom and gloom is another man's facts. Thus far only doom and gloom is supported by the facts. Other predictions are wishes, dreams and ramping (spinning yarn perhaps). For two years doom and gloom, the facts, have ruled and continue to rule the day.

It is amazing how those who discuss the facts not conjecture , who have been correct all along, are considered heretic.
After reading the Annual report, there are no facts that lead to investment. The facts do not show that financing will allow this company to grow. On the contrary , some will continue with their lifestyle.

We will save competence and ethics for another day.

Mirasol,

You may be correct but who will get custody of Postalot?

I reckon Lord Lucan is in way too deep to sell the wreckage to JTP. He has covered for him for so long, touted the company etc, he may as well go down with the ship?

Anyone who thinks GL will get favourable loan terms - if at all - is self deluding, IMO. No revenue, no cash producing assets, main asset valued at 1GBP. There are many more safer options for lenders to invest capital w lower risk and better returns. Cheerleading does not create value for PIs or a better management team , even if you call it 'new' , which it is not.

Let's see Lord Lucan and his ward JTP deliver a solid balance sheet. Until then , enjoy the trade, that's the money and fun. Not this other nonsense about having a future.

Torreaguas

Funny how I have already answered your question but you missed it because the attack squad was out in full force - we always see this when the real action is about to take place. I wrote "As for all the nouveau cheerleaders, good luck w your trades - hope you make some dosh."

The real winners are those allocated options by the company at less than 1/2 p. The price will rise and fall like any other AIM company nor do I begrudge real PIs making money. Real PIs deserve to make money not false prophets. Make no mistake the price is not rising because ANGS has a glorious future.

Croqman

Your response on behalf of many LTHs and the majority of investors , sounds like a pitch from a broker. You in fact do not know what anyone thinks.

Perhaps you should look in the mirror at your own myopic and ‘delibarte’ view which completely ignores the facts of the last 18months, no profit, a decimation of share price by over 85%, over compensated partners for assets, under estimated budgeting and an endless need for the next placing - to name just some of the inconvenient truths.

I won’t filter you because I don’t need to hide from anyone or the facts. Carry on.

Yanis2005, no additional shares purchased. Flattered you would hold me as an example for your side but rational thought and analysis dictate that ANGS is no place for investment.

Torreaguas, you obviously don't know but make conjecture -quite similar to your promotion of Angus. So do stick to the facts you say you know. You said ANGS is a different company? Yet, the facts are that it is the same company with the exception of the independent board that quit after a boardroom coup by the Director of Business Development who has not developed any business , made the same promises as the 'old' company and has the distinction of attempting to sell his shares secretly in America. And yet you claim in Trumpian fashion that an action group is out get you, the company yet we have the a beautiful management team that is tremendous , the greatest.

Apologies Gallifreyan, I don't understand your point...you said" it's common place for nominees to hold large positions in listed companies" ... yes from my statement , we agree on the obvious...further you asked "Can you point to a previous connection between Forest Nominees and Angus please" ...I never said there was one but that is exactly the point init. What is the past connection? We don't know because a faceless organization that exists on paper just purchased 8% of the equity. And not a peep from the temporary MD (permanent?) ...

Quite true Rastuss. I find it odd that Lord Lucan is silent as a faceless organization buys 8% of equity. Yet he nor his Chairman buy none. Funny how Forest and WH Ireland have a long association according to public documents. For LTH , this smells. As for all the nouveau cheerleaders, good luck w your trades - hope you make some dosh. The real winners are those allocated options by the company at less than 1/2 p. Some would call those ANGS insiders. This is entertainment not a company with a future.

What what lol

"No point saying something if one has nothing new to say and filters mean there isn't very much to read"

That has never stopped the Postalot crowd before...Hmmm

Rastuss: Was it not a decisive and clear communications to investors that ANGS put out 4 RNS in one week? Why would anyone expect the temporary (permanent?) MD to put out one RNS with all the information, if he can do it with 4? Speaking of information, do you think Rupert decided to sell after the first RNS or the 4th? I say his decision to close his entire position was surely a coincidence. He was just lucky there was more volume that week to unload it all. Can you blame him if all the punters rushed in? How was he to know? Clearly, no harm done.

This placing wreaks of desperation. It is obvious to the Lucanista given they can only blame investors with negative sentiment for expressing alarm. 250 k? For working capital? The company is running on fumes after poor decisions , poor forecasting and poor governance.

If not , where is Lord Lucan and Lord Paddy’s investment when the company needs funds most? Obviously too risky for them but not skyfarmer. They don’t want to pay JTPs salary either.

Is there a statement from Lord Lucan? Shameful company leadership.