Member Info for wealdpwr

Alan2017 , do ignore the MM/Paid muppets. Keep writing!

However, can you opine slightly more on the contradiction... Looking at the quoted estimates - they see to be saying the same thing:

1587 bopd equivalent
3-4 Hours total apprx
200 bopd

This seems to make sense : 1587 / 24 = 66.1
66.1 * 3 =198

With JTP running the operations who knows what was accurate but this seems fairly close ....

Postalot never failing to disappoint with his keen eye for finance....ramptastic! You said:

"As of now, don't believe Saltfleetby or Balcombe are in the share price at all, but Brockham is definitely out of it."

Therefore the company has no assets and is worth nothing. As I have always said , those looking for the AAAG can attend meetings M-F, 10A-5p at Building 3 Chiswick Park ....

Same point, I doubt the NEX facility would be available before there is production. The NEX is a bond therefore it needs to be under written with provable, steady cash flow to pay the coupon, I doubt any bond covenant would allow an issuance before such time. IMO, It is the wrong debt instrument for ANGS.

Rastuss

Thanks. Agreed. But one point, I don't see why there is that much space for an uptake agreement, given it is a commodity. ANGS will be paid the market price WHEN they deliver. The rest is straight fwd liability and account maintenance . Otherwise the higher ups in the value chain would have to have competing agreements with multiple players - inefficient and not sensible. Therefore, I believe you either have it or don't when you deliver, not months of legal / tense negotiation. The only thing anyone would wait for is product. Or are there other considerations?

Rastuss / Alan2017

How can ANGS get an off take agreement before producing? If I'm a refinery / higher in value chain wouldn't I wait to see they can actually get it done first?

New Angus / Old LLTM

Nice to see you are in a pleasant mood today. What makes you think ANGs is well funded w plenty of cash and will not need a placing? Would you explain further and include your estimated burn rate?

GLA / DYOR

What a wonderful day to hope. I have read the following in the last 12 hours on this board.

>I agree 2p in August is always my bet,

>Should test 2p if it does imho dyor

>It was 3.55p at the close the day before the Brockham RNS of 28/06/19: despite the appearance of the current share price, there is more to ANGS than Brockham.

>I agree with Nostradamus that permission should come soon and then it will test 3P IMHO.

The Lucanistas don't have a single fact or action to back this up. Nor does permission mean a single p of revenue. The evidence is only of delay. The track record is abysmal. And the only value creation is being suppressed by a mysterious group , the boogeymen to blame for all of poor George's troubles. AN objective observer would say it is nearly impossible for anyone to make money on ANGS by holding it longer than a week and the money put at risk would be too high to make it worthwhile. so one has to wonder what is all this ramping for?

The only real money can be made on this share is by the Earls, Captain America and the Brokers. Who can only rely on their PR team to attract some lazy punters. Anyone looking for factual information or providing factual analysis is the enemy.

Therefore, I'm afraid poor Michael won't make his 2.4p in the short /medium term. As for the long term anyone making a prediction is either a grifter or simply dim. If the Lucanistas weren't a paid cohort , they could instead for their own group and simply lend money to Angus and get a better deal then ever buying a share. Or better yet, I hear this company Fever Tree provides a lovely beverage and something unknown to this lot, a return.

Rastuss , was it not Lord Lucan who said ANGS would not be affected by Covid 19?

Rastuss, I doubt that would be possible. We have to assume the regulators will do their jobs. I doubt they have a kind word for the two Earls and Captan America. I would also assume the company is collecting a nice dollop of interest from an investment of the funds...( they have to figure out some way to pay for Captain America)...They will have to do a raise either way which will cover any losses from that fund and enough for the initial SFB project. The clock is definitely ticking for ANGS Entertainment. If SFB fails I think chances are quite slim we will see a third act , hence the prospect of a merger where the new entity assumes the tax losses. Given Lord Lucan's PR man keeps chatting up the tax losses as if they are investor gold , which they are not , some crafty accounting type could figure out a paper solution. Either way shareholders will lose.

Postalot,

Lord Lucan could not ask for a better PR man. Thank you for this info.

Rastuss , I agree it is all about Poundland. It has been that way since Lord Lucan temporarily took over as MD. IMO it was a deal to a) give investors a future fairy story b) demonstrate Lord Lucan was the new Earl in town with a project of his own c ) keep the lights on. Poundland offered a pot of cash and a placing opportunity to sustain exorbitant expenses and salaries , including his own .

George kicked the can down the road , knowing a future raise would be needed to complete the job. Not an awful strategy but his statements / decisions betray him.

AAAG Meeting tomorrow:

3 Chiswick Park 566 Chiswick High Street London W4 5YA

Rastuss, rainbows as in unicorns and other fairy tales.

Take your Bets, I think you have a gambling issue if you are placing your children's school fees in ANGS. Please seek help immediately, I would hate to see those kids not grow up properly due to the machinations of two Earls and one Captain America.

Let's just say I was being kind as I did not want to accuse anyone of dirty tricks.

Rastuss ,

I would suggest making the 1.5p share price at closing or opening.Don't get caught in the improbable intra day trading snafu.

gkb47, not is he only on the team, Lord Lucan is the MD of the AAAG.

The only evidence of an anti Angus action group that’s goal is to damage the company and in turn peoples investment is sitting in an office in Chiswick. It is the height of naïveté to be kind, to suggest anyone on this board can do more damage to ANGS than Lord Lucan and his exploration squad. Who is responsible for spending ? Rastuss? Who is responsible for Profit? Alan? Are both disgraced ANGS BOD chairs on this BB? The only words destroying your so called investment are in the company RNS . In fact this lot of posters ramping, who moan about a conspiratorial group that doesn’t exist , claiming a fictitious organization are ruining their ANGS investment clearly demonstrate that ANGS is vapor, if the company’s share value is found on this BB. This is a company not a fashion brand of upscale hunting attire. Control expenses, sell a product for a good margin and show a positive return on invested capital and your shares will do brilliantly.

There are a few legacy behaviours on this board which IMO are simply dumb:

1- Filtering - what's the point?
2- Asking whether a person is invested. It proves nothing.
- If yes, it doesn't change the writer's statements or the facts, nor is it actual proof of an investment
-If no, it doesn't change the writer's statements or the facts, nor is it actual proof of no investment

Asking the question has no basis as to whether ANGS is a good investment or value to investors on this BB. It has limited value to major shareholders who would prefer such facts not be discussed.

To be frank, I don't think an action group ever existed . We have zero evidence of such either from this board or the company save for one person maybe posting on this BB. Seems Postalot and Lord Lucan are scared of their own shadow on this issue, perhaps the threat alone scares them given the company performance. The company nor anyone on this BB can name any actionable item - except for the behaviour of Captain America which would not be worth the time or money.