We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
RBM
Was anything done to try and influence the bidding process outcome eg delay, open to more transparency etc? Or was this always going to be a long-term legal thing?
OOOps, should say CAG Costs
This is beginning to look like the first stage of a long-term fishing expedition for money.
Insolvency experts = quick solutions and maximum fees. They've succeeded.
Lawyers = long-term solutions and maximum fees. No guarantee of success.
Hi Rbm,
I sent letters to oil companies and got no response, but never expected any and I suspect this is true for others. Has CAG got involved in any way in stage 1, the bidding process? Eg seeking transparency, a delay, responses from other oil companies etc? Or is everything geared to stage 2, the legal process? Thanks.
"Former subpostmaster Lee Castleton reveals £150m paid to lawyers in Post Office scandal...." I don't know how true this is, but lawyers = fees and this case will run for years, which = humungus fees. We need to somehow stop/delay the bidding process, "building a case" long term is for the birds.
Shouston, I emailed jgant@globalwitness.org this morning and cced media@globalwitness.org
Https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/mar/29/exxonmobil-liberian-oil-deal-went-ahead-despite-anti-corruption-concerns "A spokesman for COPL said the company had fully investigated the findings in the auditor general’s report, and found there were no irregularities. It said it had insisted on a fully transparent process for the deal, which required approval by a vote of both the Liberian congress and senate, as well as the approval of multiple Liberian ministries"
Basically JVP = stich-up between Copl and Exxon planned over last two years, now reaching its denouement. Where gang members (direct and indirect eg govts, authorities etc) say "looked into...found nothing wrong..." and SH get dildoed up the cake hole.
3 Stas20 mailing,
People can simply copy and paste either letter, then copy and paste the email addresses. I use Microsoft and simply sent the email to myself, putting the other addresses in the cc box, which means recipents can't see who else is getting one. I also marked as High Importance. Hope this helps. Took 2 minutes.
2 Stas 20
Here's your email list, with a few delted as undeliverable.
IR@torm.com
investorrelations@nustarenergy.com
Investor.Relations@DelekUS.com
DKLIR@DelekLogistics.com
JLanders@rpc.net
glp@investorrelations.com
investorrelations@helixesg.com
IR@dorianlpg.com
InvestorRelations@genlp.com
info@caplp.com
investor.relations@teekay.com
gpiontek@newpark.com
IR@solarisoilfield.com
IR@CactusWHD.com
IR@summitmidstream.com
investor.relations@enbridge.com
Ir@marathonpetroleum.com
investorrelations@p66.com
Investor.relations@eprod.com
investorrelations@valero.com
InvestorRelations@energytransfer.com
InvestorRelations@williams.com
invest@suncor.com
investor_relations@tcenergy.com
km_ir@kindermorgan.com
investor.relations@cenovus.com
investors@halliburton.com
investor.relations@bakerhughes.com
InvestorRelations@targaresources.com
investor@cheniere.com
investor-relations@pembina.com
Kristen.Shults@WesternMidstream.com
investors@hollyfrontier.com
PlainsIR@paalp.com
apatel@parpacific.com
InvestorRelations@TechnipFMC.com
investor.relations@weatherford.com
mkennedy@anteroresources.com
HessMidstreamPartners@hess.com
ir@pbfenergy.com
IR@ViperEnergy.com
scott.grischow@sunoco.com
ntetlow@equitransmidstream.com
WebsterK@natfuel.com
InvestorRelations@CVREnergy.com
1 Stas20:
I've emailed the companies and used your letter but shortened it, see below. I wrote an email to myself and put all the emails into the cc box, which means I only had to send one email. I also marked it High Importance.
"Subject Are YOU interested in an Enormous Oil Opportunity in the Powder River Basin
Dear Sir,
Right now, Canadian Overseas Petroleum (COPL) faces allegations of corporate misconduct and those responsible are trying to seize control of the assets on the cheap, which may land them in jail. Amidst this current turmoil lies a window of opportunity, a chance for you to make a truly valuable investment.
Why should you be interested?
• 40 years plus of increasing oil production.
• 2P NPV at 10% DCF stands at a formidable $492 million, as of July 31, 2022.
• A massive discovery in the Cole Creek area, with over 993.5 million barrels of Original Oil in Place, independently verified by Ryder Scott and compliant with NI 51-101 regulatory standards.
• Recent infrastructure upgrades to GGS to support enhanced oil production, with potential for considerable carbon capture in miscible EOR project.
Time is of the essence, swift action is required. Visit www.copl-media.com for background information, and track the CCAA and Chapter 15 proceedings at https://www.ksvadvisory.com/experience/case/canadian-overseas-petroleum
To put it bluntly, why not take a look, see what you think? If you can’t make a load of money there I’d be very interested to know your reasoning? Thanking you in advance for your prompt attention and any thoughts.
Finwithtrader, thank you. As a LTH I've crossed the two sides of my heart in hope, but the two sides of my brain wouldn't cross in the same way... ...Anyway GLA and let's see how it pans out.
We either spend ALL EFFORT on introducing something into the current sales process, like an external bidder or obtaining a delay, all very difficult, or we kiss good bye to dosh and get a life. Effort today on later legal case proceedings is for the birds, people who like a project and 5-10 years of legal fees. No win no fee sure, but in there, there will be "costs", lawyer lunches etc. Call me a cynic..........but of all similar cases what % see a good result? And after how many years? Who likes Mondays :-)
I'm sure I've missed things but who do the LOIs and Qualified Bids go to for initial scrutiny and decision on which to submit to court? Is the Kravitz/AM gang involved in this or is it totally court regulated? I think it's crucial we somehow insert something now (independent bidders, court monitors, judicial delay, transparency, once a deal is done stage 2 will be a 5-10 year legal case? Who appointed the Monitor? If this outcome has been 2 years in the planning then they will anticipated a lot of this and put solutions in place? A good w/e to one and all.
Hi Shaa, I contacted Exxon, Devon, GMT Exploration, Murphy Oil, Marathon Oil and Hess Oil which I believe operate in Wyoming. Their PR, Production and general contact emails.
I've posted this on his JustGiving page "Defrauded Pensioner To ICR: check Ryan's role in the COPL oil company. Do you really want tainted money? Have you checked what he's done? He's now using your charity to laundry his CV." https://www.justgiving.com/page/ryan-gaffney-1692272600856
I'm assuming he will be making a donation, where's that money come from!?!? I also ticked the box saying I would like a personal Thank You email from him... :-)
I've just emailed him, took two minutes.
Here's my wording but you should change as as you want to. " Subject: Urgent: Canadian Overseas Petroleum Ltd COPL
Hello Governor Pearlman, Is this something your should look into, given damage to reputations and people’s welfare? Before more people are encouraged to take advantage of lax financial regulations, again? We know Stock Exchanges carries risks but what do authorities say about fraud? Canadian Overseas Petroleum Ltd made a major oil find, one billion barrels or more, onshore, in Wyoming! As confirmed by the subsequent Ryder Scott Report. There is “evidence” of a plan by current owners to buy the company on the cheap by decimating its share price. A sale has been organised very quickly by the “interested” parties and the process is happening now. See https://www.investorx.ca/search/00021327/canadian-overseas-petroleum-limited Have you heard of this, would you be interested in looking into it, talking to key people? An Action Group has been set up https://www.prnewswire.co.uk/news-releases/copl-action-group-shareholders-in-canadian-overseas-petroleum-limited-require-answers-as-company-loses-98-of-value-302043695.html and specialist financial lawyers hired and a website being finalised see www.copl-media.com
This sort of thing brings the whole finance industry into disrepute and surely reflects badly on everyone?
I would welcome your involvement. Possibly worth a sniff around, getting involved? Thank you.
"Perhaps we should all be emailing the Cities Minister directly to get him involved? He may then feel the pressure to get FCA to take a look if enough do so! His email is bim.afolami.mp@parliament.uk
I've just emailed him, took two secs.
"Can we not go back to arguing amongst ourselves please! " I second that comment.
Panamabob, tuvok et al, put a sock in it. As a LTH I think Email's comments are perfectly valid, just ones you don't "like" We all know guilty parties get off as evidence isn't accepted. Let's see what happens.
I'm still surprised at the level of secrecy they have managed to maintain over such a long period. No big media noise when onshore discovery first made, no TO approaches, no media coverage/analysis of RS report etc etc. A complete lid on such a big discovery, amazing! How ?