Member Info for waddaweknow

The ones I've sent in via investormeetcompany.com are:

1 Who benefited from the link with TradeFlow and in what way?

2 Syme paid £31m for TradeFlow Capital, how much will Syme get from the sale back and when?

Market closes at near 52 week low just prior to big event. Time to squeeze those botox tight and pray.

I'm a LTH, not into ramping/de-ramping and believe the company is sitting on enormous potential. My concern is always how much of the upside PIs get? Two questions-given MMs have more info than we do why is SP constantly falling, even today? How likely is a deal whereby PIs basically get Jack Sugar while AM and friends get the 99.9999% odf the cake?

Everyone can be a Chief at Emperor Draper Nero's table! And of course each Chief needs his own tribe so wage bill must be choking. Wonder what the revenue/employee is....? Or rate of wage bill increase versus rate of SP increase...? Or... I think I'll just go for my morning fundamental :-) :-) I'm a LTH not into ramping/deramping so all hot air balloons can naff orrf

I voted to keep BOD, one being much the same as any other, but against consolidation and name change. I really don't see any benefit to this in the middle of JV/RBL negotiations. How does it add shareholder value? One is heavy discussion, the other is admin detail, sorted once a deal is agreed. Unless AM's Ego won't allow a deal...?

"Arthur’s stained Y fronts, you’ve just put me off my hash browns" AND "As for Arthurs stained underpants may I be so bold as to suggest an overnight soak with a baking soda solution followed by a nice hot wash. Personally i don't have this problem as when I'm at home I am free of such encumberments Ha!. " Amidst the hope and fear, a little humour... Personally my Y fronts are crossed, as a LTH hoping for good times... :-)

Any JV partner has done due diligence on AM's under ware by now and knows the story behind every stain, they don't need consolidation/name change to dress up any deal. If required it can be done after, why announce before? I feel AM is going it alone and wants an outside investor to help with RBL, hence consolidation and name change. In other words a long haul before any sizeable el dorado. I'm not an oil person but am a LTH.

Yes. Turnover is Vanity, Profit is Sanity but Cash is Reality.

Actually my query was answered a few posts earler by SteveV

Why are some saying a consolidation means dilution? If AM decides to later use the high SP to carry on in charge and live off ongoing placings, then yes, but this is two steps? A consolidation in itself doesn't mean dilution does it? I'm a LTH and not into ramping/deramping

"DVRG impacting here as well by association?" More than just association, hasn't GB now moved over to Msys? What impact will the spotty leopard have here and how can anything be believed anyway?

baserite,
In essence AM seems to be slowly transferring the 1bn barrel asset, from company to his "affilates"...?

Company is back to being a going concern for at least a year with funds to increase production, plus the RBL and JV are closer, yet SP doesn't react! My fear is an "inner group" to take it private. The BH has 15-20%, the new II has ?%, AM has ?%, plus one or two others to get 51% plus? Leaving PIs with a small premium to current SP? Is this scenario possible or me misunderstanding things or paranoia? What % SH do PIs hold? I'm a LTH not into ramping/deramping.

I'm sure we're sitting on a "goldmine" and that AM will deliver; what I'm not sure of is how much of the cake we will enjoy? BODS and IIs tend to look on PIs as something their shoe picks up while out walking the dog, so will we get fair reward or left over crumbs? For what it's worth I'm a LTH and just bought some more, average is now 13p!!!! Sums things up, praying to Lady Luck... :-) :-)

Is AM the old dear living in a country castle, asset rich cash poor, lost her marbles and can't feed the cat. Or will he deliver? What's his record in say the last 5 years, not for him or IIs, but for PIs?

Could there be a T/O on the cheap; given the low SP, a group could build a sizeable stake then T/O? This is not a deramp but a concern about the low SP. I'm hoping you all give lots of reasons why it's 100% unlikely...?

Ah yes, that's right. However 1.3bn shares at 0.15 is going to be a bit of a drag. I'm a LTH who exited at 0.56, at a loss and now wondering whether to re-enter, so I can feel the pain once again.... :-)

Maths is not my strong suit but current MC is 1.3bn shares at say 0.16. Will new MC be roughly £3.5m (existing £2m MC plus new £1.5m), with 4bn shares (the existing 1.3bn, plus 1.3bn new, plus 1.3bn new warrants). So new SP will be roughly £3.5m divided by 4bn, which is, ehrr.. 0.0875?? Cash in bank is not really part of MC but does this back of *** packet give rough idea of new SP come March, or is it way off? Thanks for any thoughts.

Perhaps I'm a Chat AI... :-) :-)
Who can tell what is real online anymore but one thing is for sure. We can all have our own thoughts/interpretations, but we can't all have our own facts regarding the real world.

Pokerchips,
Looking at the speed of your posts, bad grammar, bad comprehension, bad logic and lack of anything sensible to say, I sense you're one of these new Chat AI bots we're reading about. The ones some students use to pass exams. Apparently they can look quite realistic at a superfial level..... Go on, tell us how you've just made another £11k... :-)