The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
Stirring music soundsā¦ā¦
āIt was quiet;ā¦ā¦ā¦..
Also donāt forget
ā¦ā¦ā¦ā¦ā¦ā¦. with further assays pending for the Bougouni South, Boumou and Ngoualana prospects. These final results are keenly awaited as geological logging of drillholes has highlighted the presences of wide pegmatite zones.
Thanks for the responses chaps.
Morning Daz,
I have been checking the repository quite regularly and the last sync. date is still showing as 4 April. Our amendment application has never featured, and , unless it is being worked on by authorities and will show after next sync., there are only two options surely? Firstly it has not yet been submitted or secondly that as an amendment (to licence) application, it will not appear on the repository as an application even though it is in the system.
I am trying to wade through the many (some are rather rude arenāt they!?) posts of the past few days but I take it the consensus is that should the back stop be reset, then it is the amendment to licence application that is the hiccup, rather than any other administrative issue?
Excellent work Daz,
Good to see on two points. Firstly the promptness of the Kod reply is to be commended. Secondly the content of the response is very reassuring albeit it has to spell out the obvious caveats.
Much appreciated Daz.
Of course. Itās just that Aim rule 11 seems so subjective to me; a bit of a grey area sometimes.
Hope you get a good response Daz šš
It rather depends on what you have said or asked about Dazā¦ā¦
Jeeeeesus Merc,
Some graft has gone into that. Kudos.
My view is this.
Firstly, I donāt agree with this āmissed deadlineā thing. It seems to me that CEOās are damned if they do give indicative deadlines, and damned if they donāt. (The old ābad commsā theories). As such, I always treat such matter as estimates.
Secondly, and all that said, the fact is that they did not meet the first long stop. They confirmed this by RNS as soon as it was clear to them that they could not keep the schedule. The fact, however, that they decided to set a second (risk?), AND also set a date so close to the first, suggests to me that they are certain they will keep to it. That they āmissedā the first long stop is not at all unexpected in my opinion and should not warrant undue criticism, whereas, if they miss the next having chosen to give so narrow an extension (when not being forced to do so) then they would look rather unprofessional. And we know BA is anything but.
And finally, I must admit to being rather puzzled over the Malian side of things. I must admit that, contrary to Lavs views, I did think we needed confirmation of the dms amendment to licence approval. As such, and with only two weeks to the new long stop, Lavs view of things seems to make sense.
Suspect we will soon know one way or tāother.
Thanks anyway š
Cancel the last. Found it.
Have you got a link please Tiggrrr.
I have read, read, and read again, the post written by Bluebellheart. He has not written a single word that is wrong. He is absolutely spot on.
That said, I totally agree with Dan mar. This is not the place for it. I used to have a high regard for Daz based on his Kodal knowledge. Then I read his frankly ridiculous 2057 post from last night. I wish I hadnāt read it but there it is. What surprised me is that he has the gall to talk about āintellectual levelsā. Try telling that to the academics that are trying to assess this phenomenon and what it means for the future of Europe as a whole.
It is a major major issue, and the left should not be trying to silence well reasoned concerns.
Good post Lav,
All I would add is to say more silenced than confused.
Smashinā
Thatās splendid Merc :-)
Is that the big 8 zero now Merc?
Crofton,
I didnāt dare post that on the Telegram board. Itās full of idiotic posters who simply post repetitive puerile Twitter posts, (often repeated 3 or 4 times).
Last time I tried to explain that raises were part and parcel of an exploration companies business, I got ripped apart. If we DONāT need to raise it would be because we havenāt found anything worth progressing via drill it or any other means.
And the great thing about Fcm is the way it is being led. Look at how they managed the 16p Zig Zag funding. Absolutely superb.
Great early exploration results require funding to progress in order to move up to the next level.
Bring it on.
I expect a lot. But hope for more.
Post of the day. :-)