We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
Cyrox. It’s drawer.
Hahahhahaha. Very funny my little French pastry.
As you say, there is always one. Just sayin’.
Valuation…..
No pressure😂😂
Ahhhhhh! The Gawthorpe gap!!!
I thought it was a technical term.😂
In fairness to me though New5, Croissant telling us to check ‘March 23’ was rather vague.
Anyhow, with it now thanks, but the fact he wanted to play games in trying to be clever puts him or her squarely into the pollock bracket.
Never mind.
Come on Croissant. Stop teasing.
RNS 28th….sp was 1.3p. Rose to 1.35p the following day, then started a significant rise circa 4th April.
We can see the charts. I simply don’t know what this Gawthorpe gap is and therefore can’t understand the significance.
Without that knowledge, your phrase ‘look for the price to close the Gawthorpe gap’ is meaningless.
Google et al ain’t helping.
Play nicely and gis’ a clue.
Croissant,
It ain’t ‘jumping out’ at me unfortunately.
Do you mean the RNS March 25th reference the EA?..(can’t see anything for the 23rd about an e/o?)
I am with Valuation on this…..wot the ‘eck is the GG?
Just looking at L2. From that, I can’t understand why this buying isn’t causing an uptick.
Hurrah!!!
Cont….
We must start monetising them”.
How on earth does anyone respond to that one?
Great posting all👌
Johnnieboy,
Good for you in replying to S470; I no longer have the patience with these contributors. The fact that he ‘wants to align himself’ with Hawaiifive0 is also no surprise! Birds of a feather perhaps. The EGS CEO is Bruce MacLachlan by the way…not Maclaughlin.
You told S470 that what he said were ‘all good comments’. Was that politeness or an honest appraisal? I trust it was the former?
“Making a geologist, and I'm the first say that Marc is an outstanding Geologist, a CEO is a risk, they fall in love with projects and looses sight of the fundamentals of business. That is the position in which we now find ourselves.”
On what basis did he make that statement? MS is actively involved is setting strategy for the company within the confines of the degrees of flexibility incumbent on CEO’s of early stage exploration companies. He seems a perfect fit with the meetings, networking, communication, First Nation liaison, and direction he is responsible for. He is moving projects along within tight budgetary constraints, whilst bringing in new ground. How on earth does the idiot you responded to conclude that we “have lost sight of fundamentals?”
“We have never had much cash, and that is now running perilously thin. Some are saying that a raise is coming, I'd like to know from where. With our current market cap, and some history of raising and then spending the money on projects other than what the raise was for, (last June we raised to drill North Hemlo/West Pickle, and we're still waiting as far as I know). If we can raise at all, it will be an appalling deal.”
We are an early stage exploration company. We will always raise on ‘go it alone’ projects. That is the nature of the beast. What Fcm have done is to add value to certain assets. As you say Jonnie, one of these actually up to the point of a sale potentially, and another two that, for all we know, may now be on the radar of a major looking for JV potential. When a junior explorer raises cash for a defined purpose or purposes, things nearly always change as the campaign progresses. Good CEO’s have to respond to how things pan out be they good, bad or indifferent. MS did just that this last season.
Another point is the manner in which Fcm have conducted the raises. Has he heard of raise ‘at a premium’? Or raises (plural) in our case! Is he aware of the funding we have managed to get through the arduous process of our successful project grant application? Sorry, I suspect those don’t fit his narrative.
“Marc, I know you read this, and I'm sorry if this sounds harsh, it's not personal, but this is our money and FCM needs to get back non track…” MS. If you DO read this, let me assure you that these comments do NOT reflect the views of the majority of FCM shareholders.
And finally, “We have some excellent assets, but we are not Rio, we don't have the resources to see all prospects through to the end. We must start monetising t
Alans55,
“If you don't know why it is low at the moment slacker “than” “your” even thicker than “what” I thought….”
And you suggest that someone else is thick.
Love the irony.
Bennster,
I never get it quite right…bugger :-)
Just bought 100,000 for a grand!!!!
NOTICE
21/03/2024 7:30am
RESTORATION OF TRADING ON AIM
LIVE COMPANY GROUP PLC
Trading on AIM for the under-mentioned securities was temporarily suspended. The suspension is lifted from 21/03/2024 7:30am, an announcement having been made.
ORDINARY SHARES OF 1P EACH, FULLY PAID
(BGSGT48) (GB00BGSGT481)
If you have any queries relating to the above, please contact the Company's nominated adviser on 020 7628 3396.
Confirmation RNS 7:30
Restoration of trading of the Company's Shares on AIM is expected to occur on 21 March 2024 at 7:30am …..
I can see only 2 reported US trades since the 13th…..
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/GMTLF/overview
ATrades,
I feel rubbish now, was just trying to have a bit of fun.
Huge apols.
Why does no one know the difference between of and have anymore? Is it laziness or poor education.
Should ‘of’ done this, or I would ‘of’ done that.
It is have. HAVE!!!
So, ATrades, you really should HAVE gone over to Copl.
Got it? Splendid👌
No one interested on here?
Strange.