Member Info for Tyke68

Phil

My take of it is you need to buy the company to get their voucher. Again this would increase our value in a possible takeover.

What I find interesting is question 6

“Q6: Can the CNPV be applied to a product at any stage of FDA review?

A6: Yes, the voucher can be applied to a product at any stage in development. If granted during the investigational new drug phase of a drug, the company will receive the CNPV’s enhanced communication benefits. Interim reviews throughout the process will benefit from enhanced communication and prompt responses.”

This sounds very similar to break through drug status

It is all getting very confusing but don’t worry we have a great PR team that can clearly and succinctly explain to shareholders and everybody else

Thanks

Bio

I think what best sums it up is we don’t know yet. Waiting to see what get’s approved by congress/senate etc. fingers crossed it is extended or a similar replacement but that seems to give a voucher you can’t sell.

Thanks

Showjumper

It does like somebody is slowly building a stake. However, a few sells equals a significant drop.

Larger buys equals minuscule rises.

So is the world of IBAI.

Shrek, yes it is a bit strange for stonechecker to mentioned. It has been mothballed for the last few years. Isn’t there some reason TB doesn’t want to press forward with it due to somebody else profiting from its sells TB. I could be wrong but that’s what I thought we were told previously.

Any money raised by stonchecker must go towards phase 2 surely. Time for TB to lead by example and publicise all our products. World leading technology, Poundland PR.

Thanks

Thanks

Thanks Shrek

So quite a big event and massive fundraiser. Great effort by everybody concerned.

Thanks

Question, how should a CEO be judged if say they had overseen a near 80% drop in the share price of the company over a three year period?

Question, should the company have a system in place to judge the success of a CEO, which is reported to all shareholders, and a mechanism to replace the CEO if they are judged to have failed their fiduciary responsibilities to ALL shareholders and overseen quite a significant drop in the share price?

Question, how can shareholders trust the board so that a situation is not being created where the company is taken private before any major uptick in the company value. Thus depriving loyal, long standing, supportive shareholders from enjoying the company’s ultimate success?

Many thanks BB

Thank you to all those who did vote

The vote finished positive 0, negative 22 (if we in cv life comments) and not bothered 2

Hopefully TB make take notice of this but we doubt it.

In case any body here is interested BertieBassett (BB) is also collating questions shareholders would like the board to answer. Again we doubt we will get a reply but it is worth trying.

https://www.lse.co.uk/ShareChat.html?ShareTicker=IBAI&share=Imaging-Bio

Thank you

Tyke

He did say they wanted to go it alone but then in another RNS he said we were already in talks with possible phase 2 partners. Since the. We have not had an update, same as always really. We had a few years ago with all the sales leads but never heard anymore.

Thanks

Just rereading all the recent comments again. I understand everbody’s frustration with the board and I think a lot of this is based on the fear of TB taking this private and loyal long term investors being “cheated out of” any future sale of the company and the profits accordingly.

So I would say we need reassurance from the board that they have no intention of that occurring. Maybe that would help the sentiment and trust if we had that in writing. So considering all things that have been written over the weekend I would say that’s the one thing Semantic could ask the board to do, put in writing somewhere that there is no plan to take this private.

I think we can all see the way this company will succeed for its “owners” is either to be taken over or enter into some joint ventures. As a show of good will TB and the board can just reassure us that we will be part of it. We just don’t want manipulations where our trust and loyalty is not respected.

Thank you

Linandy

It is possible. I would love to see the court case where we ask is Semantic TB or not. That could be a test case for quite a few bulletin boards. Can board members, even CEOs, post anonymously and try to influence investors on bulletin boards.

Then again are we doing Semantic a disservice maybe he isn’t part of the board and genuinely believes TB is doing everything correct and to the best of his ability and benefitting the company.

Funnily though he hasn’t my direct questions about TB and his efforts etc

This is a gamble and anybody invested here should understand that. They have to know the risks and make their own decisions accordingly.

What do newish investors, who were tempted by the AI price spike earlier in the year think? Are they still here for the long term or have they jumped ship?

Thanks

BB

I would say more of a bargain

Regardless of feelings towards semantic what he said about the possible future of GaM and our imaging is mind blowing if Mike and the team can pull it off. I know cautious always says I am being unrealistic but if GaM is proven to work we are talking hundreds of millions if not more in its value.

But then again the trust in the company has totally gone so who knows what could happen.

Thanks

Ok if you add BB’s and 1555’s negatives along with my thoughts that means we have 20+ negative votes. So Semantic will you now please tell TEB what judgment IBAI shareholders have for his efforts over the last two years.

Many thanks everybody who voted, read the discussions ( I believe some have been deleted because I thought naive and simplistic was mentioned but I can’t see them anymore). Sorry for dominating the board I will try and stop typing but it is good to show the board how a bit of “PR” can unite and does hopefully makes a difference.

Thank you and have a good week everyone

Morning everybody

So the votes so far

Positive 0

Not bothered 1

Negative 18

Can we get to 20 negative by the end of the day? I think we can safely say we have not used AI (never used chat GPT) to manipulate the figures.

This is the shareholders chance to register their judgement on TB, as he suggested after (nearly) two years. Plus semantic did want as many investors as possible to register their opinion. Quite an interesting view of how shareholders may be viewed via the thread, apologies now for the long thread and dominating the board over the weekend.

Thanks

Sorry Corry I must have missed that

Apologies

Corry

As far as I can see Brett is just a director and chairman of the remuneration committee. Not the chairman of the company, apologies if I am wrong but taking the info from the annual statement. Yes I do, and I believe Phil also, means somebody independent

Thanks

Semantic

A couple of questions you may or may not wish to answer but thank you anyway.

Do you honestly believe there is nothing TEB (with all his knowledge, experience and contacts) and the board could do to increase the share price, in the short term, say this calendar year?

If you don’t, do you think anybody else could do better?

These are genuine questions. You always come to the defence of TEB, for whatever reason that may be, and I respect that but could TEB create more value in the company if he so desired?

Or do you think that plans are afoot for that to actually happen but cannot be disclosed yet?

We just need a lifeline, a glimmer of hope etc

Thank you in advance.

Semantic

Trust and respect are earned. The board have to regain ours. Please don’t try saying we haven’t done things eg bought in the placing. We need to be told what is happening, why and by when and not left in the dark. We do support the company.

Vote update still 0,17,1 but hopefully people are out enjoying the weather rather than reading this board.

Thanks

Afternoon everyone

Sorry to disturb your board but I have been encouraged by “semantic” to ask all IQAI/IBAI shareholders to take part in a vote on the IBAI board I have initiated. As indirect investors in IBAI I thought you may to wish to participate in the vote. Semantic wants as many shareholders as possible to be asked hence me posting on this board.

Basically just under two years ago Trevor Brown told a shareholder that he (TB) should be judged by shareholders in two years time. So with the two years nearly up and a 80%+ drop in the sp I am asking do you believe TB’s efforts have been

Positive (0 votes so far)

Negative (17 votes so far)

Not bothered (1 vote so far)

The link for the chat is below

https://www.lse.co.uk/ShareChat.html?ShareTicker=IBAI&share=Imaging-Bio&page=2

Apologies the vote is quite a few comments below the top now.

Anyway thanks for your patience reading this and have a good rest of the weekend. Please feel free to make any comment you wish for and against TB’s efforts. Sensible ones only please

Thank you

Tyke

Semantic

Maybe TB could follow Phil’s suggestion and have a non exec chairman. This would be a way to show that all shareholders are valued. At the moment we don’t feel valued at all. I know this is a big generalisation but I feel that is the case.

Thanks

Morning Semantic

All we are asking about is how we feel TB should be judged as he himself suggested to Bertie.

If TB feels the needs to explain the plan regarding investment case etc for the future to the shareholders and what the board is doing to increase the share price, which itself mentioned several years ago, I am sure we would all be grateful. I don’t think that is too much to ask from a CEO.

Currently the vote is 0-2-16

Those of us who have been here for quite a few years know the potential but indeed have no real idea what it could mean in monetary terms. Maybe the board would like to set a target and share it with us. That’s a big problem the board don’t tell us what’s happening eg phase 2 partners. They drop into RNS’s but then never follow up with what’s happening. The board seems to want to make us believe good things around the corner but then go quiet hence all the suspicions that start to proliferate on boards like this. When the board gives a timeline like this two years it seems to be ignored. Will TB have the decent to actually reply to concerned shareholders?

I keep saying this but respect has to be earned, we cannot effect the share price by our actions, the board can.

Have a good Sunday everybody

Thanks and please keep encouraging people to vote

Morning everybody

First of all an apology for dominating the board with this poll but let’s show TB/the board/semantic how we the shareholders actually feel about what is happening to OUR company and subsequently the value of our shares.

So the scores so far

Positive 0

Not concerned 2

Negative 15

Thank you for voting so far but can we get this up to 20 votes (at least) by the close of play tomorrow and show our true feelings. Please spread the word as semantic suggested. It would be interesting to hear what indirect investors from BRH feel is happening?

Have a good day everyone

Thank you