RE: Aerospace Video8 Aug 2018 22:13
Hi Nosugar - I've commented before that HDD is a slow burner. We have production restrictions.
Bicester has no more capacity and Martindale has, I think, a max space of 6 reactors. Each reactor has a capacity to generate some 1 Mill of revenue so around 9 mill is our possible revenue once we get to the max at Martindale. To get 6 reactors into Martindale will take probably some 12/24 months at current building times (2 on the way, 2 to order)
Now we've got a senior guy in Houston it may be possible, if he can generate the business, to reintroduce production facilities in there for the O & G market plus the flow control business. Say 2/3 reactors? This will not need the high standards of NADCAD and free up both Bicester and Martindale solely for aerospace.
The other way, I can see, of increasing production quickly is to licence the coating process to the plane manufactures and their suppliers and for them to incorporate the coating in their direct manufacturing process on their own sites. Obviously we will still have to overcome the build time of the reactors but we will have no site issues.
I'm certain Airbus, Bombardier, Embraer and co are aware of our miniscule status and the strength (hopefully) of our patents. Interesting times ahead methinks!