RE: West Kytlym quarterly progress20 Jun 2023 11:43
BoB
"AMC requires over $1 billion investment prior to any development due to lack of infra-structure, road and transport links...."
Wrong. Amur's initial CAPEX was stated, in the PFS, to be US$570.4m. Over LOM their sustain costs were an additional US$494.3m. The road you make such an issue of was costed at $135.8m. A 338km road in Russian terms is akin to being just around the corner. It's no big deal and the cost, as a proportion of the LOM cost is a mere 13%. All of the above assumes the toll and not the flash smelter option.
"EUA is in production...."
Don't you think you should add to that comment "loss making" somewhere? After all West Kytlim hasn't turned a profit in the years it's been in operation with two contract miners walking away from it.
Amur received an initial offer US$100m just before the war started. The terms were then revised to stretch payment out over several years. This, as you know, was rejected by PIs. The eventual sale price of $35m was what the market determined was Amur's value given the current geopolitical situation. You could call it a fire sale but I think that would be wrong. The asset was valued at $35m given current events and the restrictions in place. The eventual price was a market valuation.
TDT