Member Info for TrickyDicky2

PD

Interesting. In light of your post what's your view on AIM Rules Governing disclosure? In particular the below?

General disclosure of price sensitive information

11. An AIM company must issue notification without delay of any new developments which are not public knowledge which, if made public, would be likely to lead to a significant movement in the price of its AIM securities. By way of example, this may include matters concerning a change in:

— its financial condition;

— its sphere of activity;

— the performance of its business; or

— its expectation of its performance.

Are they in breech of the above in your opinion?

TDT

The Q1 Ops. update for the period ended 31st. May 2024 landed on the 21st. June which, if it follows the same pattern this year, is just a little over 5 weeks aways. I'd expect to see the share price move up from the middle of June especially if AV's "......with exciting announcements on that front expected soon." comes true in the interim.

TDT

That's £20k raised. Enough for a return business class flight to the DRC with several nights in one of Kinshasa's finest thrown in for good measure.

But he will still come back empty handed.

TDT

Richyf3

If they are/have been its not showing up in the shareholder stats or at least it hasn't so far.

What intrigues me is Andrada insists on updating the shareholder figures every month when they are only required, under AIM Rule 26, to do it every 6 months.

"We could see a big move up......"

Agreed.

TDT

I see Quisling BofB Putin fan boy has still got his nose up P's back passage.

TDT

The web site has been updated to show 30/04/2025 holdings. Nothing much had changed.

TDT

"....expected soon."

How soon is soon, I wonder!

TDT

"Furthermore, the company is diligently working on integrating lithium extraction into its existing Uis tin operation, with exciting announcements on that front expected soon."

TDT

I think you miss the point of the below link.

https://www.internationaltin.org/tin-in-lithium-ion-batteries/?v=7885444af42e

The first article highlighting tin use in lithium ion batteries dates back over 6 years. By your metric "almost a decade" we should be seeing some interesting developments any day now.

TDT

"You would need to ask them....." says the cheese eating surrender monkey.

TDT

What is in the public domain and what has been developed behind closed doors are two entirely different things. LFP batteries were in a similar position a few years ago and they've come from nowhere to take a substantial proportion of the battery market.

It's a fast moving industry and it needs to be.

TDT

Tin in Lithium Ion Batteries

“Tin may be the ‘forgotten eV metal’. As other commodities gain public attention tin is quietly gaining momentum as a performance enhancing component in all of the three generations of advanced anode materials that have been roadmapped to 2030, plus some solid state technologies. Several hundred papers and patents have tracked development of tin-based materials to maximum theoretical capacity and even beyond. Although the field is highly competitive, startups and major OEMs are starting to signal their interest in tin and International Tin is monitoring developments with keen interest.”

https://www.internationaltin.org/tin-in-lithium-ion-batteries/?v=7885444af42e

TDT

Helpful

I'm referring to Bell's ability to pull in people like you that he ends up working like a glove puppet.

TDT

AimDogs

Probably close to the mark. I remember, years ago, there being a poster on the RRR/RGM boards called KennyRus. He was pretty close to Bell for a while until he got wise. It seems as though Bell is a bit of a Svengali when it comes yo pulling in the gullible or in some instances the down right unprincipled.

TDT

Spec

There is the letter of the law and there's the spirit o the law. To obey the letter of the law is to follow the literal reading of the words of the law, whereas following the spirit of the law is to follow the intention of why the law is made. The AIM Rule allowing relatively small amounts to be raised without being formally announced to the market was intended to allow companies to raise small amounts of capital as a stop gap. It was never intended to be a used in the way that Bell has done.

You're wrong to say Bell was obliged to follow anything. Bell has identified and is exploiting an anomaly in AIM Rules. The letter of the law as opposed to the spirit.

Is it sneaky to interpret the Rules in a way they weren't intended? That's the definition of sneaky is it not?

TDT

One 425,000 trade is "some lovely late buys".

What a self pleasuring clown!

TDT

"....i don't ever recall where you have a had a differing opinion between your multiple ID's..."

By that flawed logic the bulls are all one poster.

TDT

Fake it until you make it!

You can only get away with that approach for so long.

TDT

I know this is wrong but for Andrada its good wrong if it directs potential investors their way.

TDT

".....resulting in the temporary pause of the Bisie mine, operated by London-listed Alphamin."

I like the first paragraph in particular.

"Critical metals don’t come much more critical than this one, with a supply landscape painted on shaky ground and a demand profile expected to explode. And no, it isn’t lithium, graphite, rare earths or copper. The metal in question is humble tin ‒ the glue that holds the electronics market together."

TDT