RE: Production number on assumption of G. 3rd party31 Mar 2026 19:32
So HarChris, I didn't make anything up I merely "alludes to patronisation from management". You object to the intent not content.
I stand by the original post. The reasons given for discontinuing publishing AISC with the quarterly figures were disingenuous at best. If AV thinks publishing AISC every quarter might dissuade PIs from investing here let me suggest something else that's an even bigger disincentive. Management.
"'Quarterly cost and pricing estimates, while previously included, have proven increasingly misleading due to short reporting cycles and normal fluctuations in grade, recoveries, shipment timing, inventory movements, and foreign-exchange rates."
If they did what they said they were going to do when they said they were going to do it the above would be non-issues.
“we are horrifically undervalued”
He needs to look closer to home to understand why.
TDT