Member Info for TrickyDicky2

Richyf3

I think we all hope that it is but can’t say for sure. We’ll know soon enough.

TDT

Richyf3

You missed out the ? at the end of that statement.

TDT

There's something in this for most people on this BB.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAblAQENQhE

TDT

MunnieTorx

Its meant for sitting on not talking out of.

The persistent seller is not selling because the company is over valued. You've just made that up just like your 2p - 2.5p valuation.

Institutional investors sell for all manner of different reasons some of which are entirely divorced from a company's value or prospects. If you want to get a handle on what's going on try looking at what Andrada's institutional investors are doing elsewhere.

TDT

UncleJohn

I've heard that before. IMO its not correct. DTR 5.1.2 states the following.

"A person must notify the issuer of the percentage of its voting rights he holds as shareholder or holds or is deemed to hold through his direct or indirect holding of financial instruments falling within ■ DTR 5.3.1R (1) (or a combination of such holdings) if the percentage of those voting rights:

(1) reaches, exceeds or falls below 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9%, 10% and each 1% threshold thereafter up to 100% (or in the case of a non-UK issuer on the basis of thresholds at 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 50% and 75%) as a result of an acquisition or disposal of shares or financial instruments falling within ■ DTR 5.3.1 R; or

(2) reaches, exceeds or falls below an applicable threshold in (1) as a result of events changing the breakdown of voting rights and on the basis of information disclosed by the issuer in accordance with

■ DTR 5.6.1 Rand ■ DTR 5.6.1A R;

https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/DTR.pdf

Does the 5% requirement apply here? When it says "non-UK issuer" I take that to mean Andrada so reporting crossing every 5% might be what we will see since Andrada is a non-UK issuer.

On 19/05/2021 Canacoord issued a TR-1 when they went from 5.4957% to 11.2072% so that would seem to tie in although that was achieved when they took part in a fund raise and not a prolonged accumulation of shares in the open market.

If they are dumping then a crossing of the 5% boundary is the earliest we will get confirmation.

TDT

Pekingduck

The shorting/naked shorting explanation gets trotted out regularly. I'm not into conspiracy theories so that doesn't really explain it for me. If this is Canaccord dumping they're not going to announce crossing percentile boundaries because its simply not in their interests to do so. They were happy to submit TR-1s on the way in/up for obvious reasons but not so on the way out/down.

The company could pull them up on their failure to abide by the rules but would it do them/us any good? If Canaccord are desperate to exit pulling them up on their failure to submit TR-1s will not help the share price.

TDT

Sville

That doesn't explain the absence of TR-1's through out the dump, if in fact they are dumping.

TDT

PI’s are likely to be more concerned with FOGF!

Fear

Of

Getting

F_u-c-k-e-d

TDT

Blueboy1975

I wouldn't expect him to be around in a couple of months. He's only here for the current pump as are a few others (I'm pretty sure you can figure out who they are). They'll be gone after the next round of dilution having sold for a 10 to 15% profit.

TDT

H5O

"I have to say a number of ducks are lining up here......"

Bell's ducks are absolutely not in a row, I doubt he even knows where some of them are and I'm pretty sure some of them are pigeons.

TDT

“Do you know what the word "repatriate" means?”

Meaning and action are not, as so often with Bell, one and the same.

TDT

Given the number of shares being dumped its surprising we don't see more RNS's announcing the crossing of percentile boundaries. According to AIM rules:-

"Changes to the holding of a significant shareholder above 3% (excluding treasury shares) which increase or decrease such holding through any single percentage."

Somebody ain't playing by the rules IMO. The only time you do that is when you think you have something to gain by remaining in the shadows.

TDT

"....we have through the relationships established in the country found ourselves in a position to move forward in a close co-operation which is expected to lead to a new project opportunity.

These are continuing discussions, and given their sensitivity and potential impact on the Company we will continue to update frequently, erring always however on what we judge to be the side of caution."

If you believe any of that you deserve to get rogered in the most unpleasant of ways.

TDT

“He said he wasn't coming back from DRC empty handed.”

Does a duty free bottle of Johnnie Walkers and 200 Silk Cut count? 😳

TDT

"Personally don't think it's a wise move to upset the applecart at this late juncture."

The wheels fell off this applecart a long time ago.

TDT

That's Confounded being ironic again.

TDT

Banburyboy

Confounded is nothing more than a nuisance, that's all.

TDT

“Empathy is something I work hard on….”

You could try harder, that way you might not come across like a smug, sanctimonious git.

TDT

This is where it all started.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/search?d=HOMEPAGE_PS&q=The+Coming+Storm

Listen to Series 1 first.

TDT

"Just what do they think they are doing here?"

Apart from amusement I guess they're watching and learning about how gullible some investors can be.

More red flags than a CCP rally. Can you be colour blind to red? I guess it must be possible if Eurasia is anything to go by.

TDT