RE: Adding again4 Apr 2020 18:57
Hi notaflipper, the finals will be out this month. Personally I would not attribute too much correlation to NCYT’s growth, sp performance or financials. For YGEN testing and production is just a new revenue stream and unlike NCYT the market is not taking views of dependency or supply constraints, a sp choke that will apply to NCYT. As far as YGEN are concerned they can deal with x number of units and scale up within existing capex to produce and test whatever their capacity is. They then have a choice, do more (scale up which costs) or turn down work. Therein lies the significance of the ebitda number in the next set of results. It’s simply cash, they have shown exceptional organic growth at the interims and are cash positive to 0.3m with more to come and how much more from the accretive acquisition of Elucigene. They reduced costs significantly in H1 and one off’s no longer apply, its therefore (imo) pretty obvious that they have slack for no other reason than being slightly ahead of the curve for the IONA platform and potential further acquisitions. Whilst the finals will be historic, pre-Covid, it’s the outlook and credit/cash position that will be key. How much work can they take on that’s Covid related without compromising the existing model and what does that model look like going forward. Is Covid a stop gap using intrinsic capacity and just a bit of extra pay costs or is it going to feature as a longer term revenue stream and if that is the case is it self financing, do they need a cash injection, do they divert funds etc. This imo is the current enigma, however, rest assured the base model (bau) is sound and the sp has not been hyped as a Covid-19 stock. It’s hardly moved, yet. Finally for those very reasons that I have painted do not expect YGEN to make an astronomical rise like NCYT or have the billion $ potential of SNG. This is a pretty safe play with risk to the upside. All imo.
Trek