RE: Update31 Oct 2020 20:18
Wlaw1
I tick the recommend because I want to believe in the project. Please appreciate I am getting confused on what is happening and to read my scribing with that in mind. There is nothing underhand in what I am writing, but I am really am trying to get a grip of the story unfolding here.
The problem was that the RNS was written in a concise way and maybe it needed just a few extra sentences in a few places as its genuinely open to different interpretations. For example the new development strategy. They could have restricted that to carbonate MREC work, as the evidence to support it is probably overwhelming in the advantages it offers and we can see that as tons of materials drops in weight and processing costs to end users in where it is used in the upper supply chain. Instead we do not know if they are throwing in the whole kitchen sink with all the exploratory work as well with Coola and UK design project and everything is combined as one development plan all in one go. Its great to have all these plans and opportunities, but I do feel focus, like achieving a big mine construction was a risk that we all signed up to when buying shares and suddenly its possibly getting diluted with many other objectives all linked in with it. As the story changes, so do the start up costs and all the other factors on project risks that increase along with the ambitions of the newer plan. Some of us want to see if this company can deliver a new Angola mine on time and to the anticipated delivery costs. The exploratory work in the UK is good idea, but the emphasis is that its exploratory and really not a part of the on-going BFS that builds the actual mine and concentrated resource product.
If another investment is needed to help build magnets for UK windfarms, I would prefer it was operating as a subsidiary company and the downstream work which is so massively different in skill sets and risks was not linked to the financial success of what is done in Angola. So if Pensana want to create a spin out company in UK to do all that kind of work and it does not affect the Angola side of the business and its profitability that would be fine by me. If I wanted to buy shares on the spin out I could if I wanted to. Pensana might have shares in the created spin out company as well if they wanted that risk. In essence, what I am concerned about is that the project is expanding way beyond what I thought I was putting funds into and I do feel the difference between exploratory design work like in the UK needs to be separated at some point from new development strategies applicable to what is being done in Angola.