We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
Another who clearly has no clue what deramping is. Predicting a 500% rise is hardly talking down a share to secure a cheaper entry.
Ssccss. It's not so much that the timeframe is decent but whether it accords with what was said by RW. He has no clue how to set deadlines and seems not to care at all how the market reacts to his missing them all.
Bline. Firstly, truth is a flexible concept. As for 'ramping' and 'deramping', these are often misunderstood. Being positive is not ramping and being negative is not deramping. These terms apply to those trying to seek better exit or entry for themselves by over accentuating potentially good or bad news. Oddly enough, many boards have voyeurs who simply come on and post nonsense because they have nothing better to do.
It is no surprise that the price drops when everyone keeps saying "news Monday", "news next week" or whenever, only for it not to come. We have seen enough of Roland to take everything with a pinch of salt and just wait until news happens.
Jackpack. It may depend on how you interpret the words 'in concert'. That would imply a degree of planning between the parties involved and necessitate their knowing each other outside of this board. A number of individuals acting on their own but in a similar way wouldn't meet that definition. I also can't see people bothering with small fry like SYN.
Perhaps I should have said 'effective market'. Believing a share will drop is not "attacking" the company just taking a different view from lth. When they are wrong and have to buy back in holders benefit. If there are ten horses in a race and I back one I am 'shorting' the other nine.
Mattpr. I've never shorted in my life but no shorters=no market. The problem on here is people playing both sides, telling you how great an RNS is and selling five minutes later. I agree about taking a position and sticking to a target. If .3 appears I, and I suspect many others, will be gone.
I don't think .2 will be an issue, it's a matter of when. How much of today's price, which is up significantly from the start of the year, factors in this news? The recent sudden spike to .21 lasted minutes. A build up to this level should make it more sustainable with a lower volume of sells with each incremental rise.
An excellent interview and if what was said transpires then even better. The issue of the raise seems to be settled for now and for some months ahead. More than happy to be wrong about that. As for GoI approval let's see what happens. This is less in Roland's gift than the issue of the fund raise but I mentioned last week that having an Indian jv partner should help in that respect. May be my .3 target will be met and I can cash out my original stake and let a few ride. There should be some upwards movement but this is where previous shifting deadlines holds us back. Today was a good start to rebuilding trust, let's hope it continues.
I agree that there are some who dwell on anyything negative and almost seem to want things to go wrong. I would dearly love them to go right after three years here but need convincing by a steady rise in the sp that they will. My year end target is still .3.