The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
Read it properly. It talks about early commencement of a work plan AFTER GoI approval, not early commencement FOR it. The former implies a desire to hit the ground running whereas as your post tries to suggest that GoI is in its early stages.
It's possible that most people WANTED to believe Roland in the same way that we don't want to believe that someone we trust has done something wrong, but deep down many of us knew what was coming (or not). Roland can set and miss all his so called deadlines safe in the knowledge that a) he will still be paid and b) there' nothing we can do.
Another who clearly has no clue what deramping is. Predicting a 500% rise is hardly talking down a share to secure a cheaper entry.
Ssccss. It's not so much that the timeframe is decent but whether it accords with what was said by RW. He has no clue how to set deadlines and seems not to care at all how the market reacts to his missing them all.
Bline. Firstly, truth is a flexible concept. As for 'ramping' and 'deramping', these are often misunderstood. Being positive is not ramping and being negative is not deramping. These terms apply to those trying to seek better exit or entry for themselves by over accentuating potentially good or bad news. Oddly enough, many boards have voyeurs who simply come on and post nonsense because they have nothing better to do.
It is no surprise that the price drops when everyone keeps saying "news Monday", "news next week" or whenever, only for it not to come. We have seen enough of Roland to take everything with a pinch of salt and just wait until news happens.
Jackpack. It may depend on how you interpret the words 'in concert'. That would imply a degree of planning between the parties involved and necessitate their knowing each other outside of this board. A number of individuals acting on their own but in a similar way wouldn't meet that definition. I also can't see people bothering with small fry like SYN.
Perhaps I should have said 'effective market'. Believing a share will drop is not "attacking" the company just taking a different view from lth. When they are wrong and have to buy back in holders benefit. If there are ten horses in a race and I back one I am 'shorting' the other nine.
Mattpr. I've never shorted in my life but no shorters=no market. The problem on here is people playing both sides, telling you how great an RNS is and selling five minutes later. I agree about taking a position and sticking to a target. If .3 appears I, and I suspect many others, will be gone.
I don't think .2 will be an issue, it's a matter of when. How much of today's price, which is up significantly from the start of the year, factors in this news? The recent sudden spike to .21 lasted minutes. A build up to this level should make it more sustainable with a lower volume of sells with each incremental rise.