Member Info for Tony13579

Alan. The proof is in
1 planning consent for a nodding donkey
2 photo of a non approved LRP
3 LROremived
4 Xmas shut down
5 planning submitted 2nd Jan for a LRP
6 Angus trying to lift with nitrogen whilst the planning is processed.

Where is your proof I’m manipulating/trading Angus.
My last buy or sale in Angus was Feb 17 and Ukog March 18?

I was shocked when I first read the Brockham application about a year ago that they proposed to use the nodding donkey.

Angus put a limitation rod pump on in early December
https://twitter.com/wealdoilers/status/1069936386856378368?s=21

Yes the flow of tankers are very reassuring. I don’t think I will get to site this week. I’m in Wales looking after my sister + 4 children and a puppy! The only tankers I can see are bulk carriers importing oil into Milford Haven....

In reply to the original post.
There is a simple separator that splits oil, water and gas just by their weight.
Then there is also a heater separator that can assist if the water is bound in to the oil.
Also the remaining water would separate within the storage tank. Clean oil at the top, water at the bottom and contaminated oil just above any water. We see the heater separator stack in use on 20-30% of site visits... less lately?.
It is possible they are reprocessing the contaminated oil from the storage tanks when they have enough to process.
There are waste water tankers leaving the site but that is mainly surface rain water and it gets processed off site.
I am reasonably confident the tankers are full of clean oil.

Gbogh... you are welcome to visit site with a camera... I would recommend a Panasonic Lumix tz60 tz70 or tz80 second hand off eBay. And a SD card reader to plug in the charging socket of your phone. ( the panisonic app is a sod to connect Bluetooth or wifi reliably) but the30x optical zoom is incredible for the money.

Plenty of people have voiced an opinion. Why is BDI getting so much stick for doing a spreadsheet 2 years ago ?
Since then there was the chap who was always posting about the herd coming .
Cunners spotting imajinary tankers and house purchases by SS
We had all sorts of statements from MR Vonk. A snekey side track, we have planning, we are fully funded, we have a production licence, we will be pumping four wells, Lidsey will fund all our operations, it’s a problem with the pump, it’s a problem with the straw, turn the taps on...
DL 3-4 weeks drill and suck it up with a straw..
SS m prospect... never put in planning.

So why blame BDI.

And the swampies are just as bad, have a fracking and fox hunting protest outside a conventional well.
Fake banner at their protest sites,

I try to let my photos and info do the talking. But I feel we all made a few assumptions at BB especially after that layby was built.

This limit would be resolved by going back to the EA and increasing the generators spec and quantity.
Then a planning amendment...

I think it was in the EA document. As it refers back to the planning consent.
Basicly the gen set running at 50% limits the site to 300bopd.
It’s possible they can manage the gas release down, or they can increase the gen to 65%...
but the production rate is covered by how much they can get through the gen set.

“The flow will be constrained by the gas produced going into the Gas generator.
41.The rate of production from the BRX4Z well will be constrained by the capacity of the generator. Should the gas produced start to exceed the capacity of the generator to accept it then the well rate will choked back. The applicant understands that the existing generator is capable of being configured to run on a variety of fuel sources, including gas. Further, a portable diesel generator is also permitted by planning permission ref: MO/2017/0916.
42.Whilst it is possible for the existing generator to utilise the gas, given the relatively short-term nature of the proposed appraisal works, it is likely that the existing generator will be replaced with a new, hired in unit. This would consist of a 375kVA gas generator with an output range of 511 kW per hour (at 50% power)to 933 kW per hour at 100% .At a production rate of 300 barrels of oil per day (BOPD) the associated gas from the Kimmeridge is anticipated to be in the region of 71 cu m per hour which is equivalent to approximately 770kW. The electrical output will be matched to the available gas output, i.e. the electrical output will be increased when more gas is available (higher pressure)and decreased when less gas is available (lower pressure)”

https://www.freeindex.co.uk/profile%28bkp-waste-recycling-ltd%29_755302.htm
You may need to scroll through the gallery.

If you google BKP ROMSEY you will find a picture of a similar tanker with the purple back.

https://twitter.com/anton13579/status/1082169407269494784?s=21
The above is proof that HH has much more to give. SS us deliberately holding KL4. Production just below the bubble point as he evaluates the reserves.

Don’t you know? Pete and I explained that.. ll

SS is deliberately keeping this below the bubble point to measure the size if the oil reserves. It will free flow when he is ready. I also feel they are timing this to get every chess piece in the right squares to hit the market with a stonking story.

He has laid out the 2 year plan, the planning is in for HH3-6.
IOW , Godley Bridge and Broadford Bridge will follow.
I'm sure there are other things in the pipeline too.(including a pipeline)
The work schedule is so busy I think they need to drill HH2 in Jan/Feb

All I can say is read the planning permission and communications with agencies. Gas emissions are a political issue.
If you think it's easy, non issue you are mad. The other option is to compress it into storage vessels and sell it. But it's worth more as electrisity.
Recently It was disclosed. That Wytch farm has wasted/burnt off all its gas as less than 5% of its production.
It's a different age now. None if these questions were asked 15 years ago

I note that he attributes all the costs to UKOG but only 71% of the income.
All the costs and income go 100% to HHDL.
All the time the well is pumping oil, there are very few staff on site. (And a very fast guard dog) your numbers are tosh.
You fail to comprehend that they are proving the size of the oil reserves.
You are piddling about calculating daily costs when there is a puddle of oil that stretches from the M25 to the south coast worth 100s of billions.

False accounting comes to mind.

106 from Portland and kimmeridge yesterday
That doesn't count the ones from 2016

I can 100% confirm that the horse hill oil leaves HH and is delivered to Hamble. We had video of two tankers leaving HH and condpfirmed the number plates 2 hours later arriving at Hamble. I believe the oil is collected in the storage tanks in till there is enough to process. They also receive oil from Stockbridge and other sites.
There are pipes both ways to Fawley , Crude in and refined out. Also pipelines direct to Heathrow and Gatwick.

I have had a long relationship with Hamble. Mum grew up there, Sold eggs to the American forces during the war! I have sailed there since I was 14.

Absolute tosh baits
From the angus planning application...
"The flow will be constrained by the gas produced going into the Gas generator.
41.The rate of production from the BRX4Z well will be constrained by the capacity of the generator. Should the gas produced start to exceed the capacity of the generator to accept it then the well rate will choked back. The applicant understands that the existing generator is capable of being configured to run on a variety of fuel sources, including gas. Further, a portable diesel generator is also permitted by planning permission ref: MO/2017/0916.
42.Whilst it is possible for the existing generator to utilise the gas, given the relatively short-term nature of the proposed appraisal works, it is likely that the existing generator will be replaced with a new, hired in unit. This would consist of a 375kVA gas generator with an output range of 511 kW per hour (at 50% power)to 933 kW per hour at 100% .At a production rate of 300 barrels of oil per day (BOPD) the associated gas from the Kimmeridge is anticipated to be in the region of 71 cu m per hour which is equivalent to approximately 770kW. The electrical output will be matched to the available gas output, i.e. the electrical output will be increased when more gas is available (higher pressure)and decreased when less gas is available (lower pressure)"

Why would any researched investor put money on Angus?
Documents show the design, planning, OGA at angus is for production not to exceed 300bopd , limited by the gas emissions and one gas to wire Gen set.

Brockham.
If they got 3 tankers a week they can pay the directors and keep the sham going.

If they got 300bopd they would be getting about £5m a year.
£1m Vonk ,Tidswell £0.5m , £3.5m to do sidetracks on Lidsey, Brockham or Balcombe..

It's not going to grow fast.... To increase production they need to buy 5 gas to wire power plants... If they want to expand? And in my opinion build passing places in that single track road.

I'm not sure where the investors get rich!

If they don't get any oil, the sp will tank and I'm not sure how they would raise 3m to do the next drill or side track.

I am not trolling , I am putting an unrealistic post on a UKOG board back into reality before the other mob complain.

SS has laid out his 9 wells/sidetrack in 2 year program. The HH crew have been given a 3 week rest period. I expect there to be a flurry of activity on site very soon. He needs to start early, and keep that momentum going. He runs a small tight inner core. I feel that needs to expand. There will be so many planning applications, OGA reports EA docs to be produced.. Three councils to deal with.