Member Info for testpack3

KTF. I can't remember if he posted a price target 'back in the day', what I do know is that he was no. 2 disciple in being an apologist for The Failure. His comment that he is 'still in profit' is laughable. I remember him having ' cheeky little top ups' at every price up to 80p. With his admiration for The Failure I can't remember any cheeky sales. He's still here trying to recover losses, like most LTH.

swazers. Thanks for your words suggesting I am some kind of genius on bacteria and H2. It is rather more simple than that. It is called being educated, and having the ability to read. When one is not educated, like yourself, any factual presentation of a technical nature, will always, by comparison to their own shortcomings, appear to be on a genius level. I thought a few posters on EQT summed you up pretty well, which you 'deramped'. I am confident your dislike of me comes from the fact that I have shown your 'charts' to be total nonsense for companies like PHE and EQT. Please ply your nonsense on cineworld plc.

That BBC headline, referring to treating plastic with bacteria, tells you all you need to know about the effectiveness of both PHE and Peels Management (?). Failed to a point of embarrassment, and all should be ashamed of themselves.
It is not new technology, been known for many years that plastic can be 'eaten' by some bacteria. With the aid of catalyst, the process can be speeded up, but is still 'slow'. The chemical reaction, with the aid of sunlight, produces syngas from plastic and CO2 in the air. We are all aware what syngas can be used for.

KTF. omg, I concur with you. Decent buys going in after 12 noon. The sort of time a typist or whoever would be getting the news to be forwarded to RNS for release after hours today or tomorrow.

ripley re 'shorts'

The easiest method to 'short' a company is to use the regular platform, such as IG, showing no holding in the share, for that A/c number. Put the quantity of shares to be 'shorted', and instead of pressing the 'buy' option, press the 'sell' option. It will either accept the position, or tell you it does not accept the trade. As you suggested, another way to bet 'against the market' is to open a 'spread betting' a/c. You will have to show that you are an experienced trader.

Rcvd below on 3 March;
Apologies for the delayed response and for the Q&A session which has not yet been made available to shareholders due to a series of site visits during February.



I understand from the Company that the Q&A session is still planned and will be announced via RNS Reach in due course.



Finally, I appreciate that there is a great deal of speculation amongst shareholders over water usage and this is something that Graham has touched on in interviews and in regulatory announcements. More information will be provided to shareholders via RNS on the Company’s water usage strategy once the final approach is approved by the relevant authorities.

It is obvious EML do not want a QnA session 'til it gets firm commitment on EISA. If that is the case, then QnA will be 'look how good we are in facing these challenges and we can now proceed with opening mine' blah blah blah. There is no honesty at Board level. If Board is doing 'whatever it takes', then inform the people who own the company, the shareholders. Rome was built quicker than this mine?

Swazers:
'@testpack3 Why are you so scared of what I do? '.and;
'By failing to separate the anonymous cowardly troll demons from real people in the comments section and other SM platforms are enabling sadistic Machiavellian psychopaths and narcissists"'
I have consistently said to you that your kind of misinformation on your charts is totally unsuitable for 'start up' companies, companies with little or no income stream. EQT and PHE ( where you also misinform posters) are 2 such companies. Charts can be useful for companies with track records of income, profit. Typically these are FTSE 100, 250 and 350 companies. Experienced investors look for PE, DE FCF metrics. Your abusive allegations about me are unwarranted, and show a person who has been 'outed' by the truth. You are an ally of another fraud, who is the epitome of a narcissist, on PHE, that is befitting. You have to make yourself known since you are peddling your company lies and falsehoods for profit. I am surprised LSE enables you. I, on the other hand, have anonymity, which is useful, since there are many nutcases lurking these boards. , who are prone to 'googling' and then posting quotes about nefarious deeds and Machiavellian uprisings. Weird really.

Joe945.
One of the main reasons that car mfrs were slow to get onboard with EV's, is that 2 of their main profit streams would be drastically cut - spare parts and maintenance costs. ( through license paying agents) An electric motor is quite easy to service, and the FC consists of multilayers of membrane, each one can be individually tested for conductivity and easily replaced. So I am surprised JCB came to that conclusion. Cost on the other hand is a problem, especially with the power requirements of heavy machinery. However HFC buses and trains ,( with power requirements in excess of heavy plant) are getting common throughout Europe. However, anything is better than diesel as a fuel.

He wanted a laugh. Any upside in sp will be driven by positive rns. When swazers can develop a chart showing when a RNS will drop, he will be onto something. Until that time, his charts are as useful as sandpaper loo rolls. Mind you, with the sh**e that emanates from him, he probably uses them.

Joe Bamford was at the forefront of innovation and design ( mainly by reverse engineering competitors products), and his heir is in the same mould. Britain, unfortunately, is now a 'follower', not a leader in innovation. I'm afraid the die was cast by Thatcher ( who I voted for), who persued an economy driven by Service Industries, rather then manufacturing. The British Volt factory, for production of next generation batteries is now bankrupt, and will likely be bought by an overseas buyer. Britain could have been at the forefront of EV's and HFCEV, but now prefer to take a backseat. An H2 ICE is obviously better for the environment that a fossil fuel one. It will however, have to burn more H2 equivilant than FF since it has an inferior CV.( clorific value). That being said, it is a better choice, but not as efficient as a H2FC. H2FC can turn the prop on a ship, so no no problem with torque. Without doubt, Lord Bamford has scrutinised this, but I would be surprised, and disappointed, if he abandons HFC, since the maintenance and spare parts are far less. Of course, the source of H2 is important, and let us hope he has the foresight to install DMG at Uttoxeter, once he sees a plant up and running ( He's not in his 80's, so should be ok.

Phyamh. NOX emissions from JCB H2 engine. I have read that JCB have used H2 Fuel Cell as a power unit, I did not know that it is developing a ICE powered by H2. The ICE will produce NOX gases since the H2 is burnt in air ( which contains the N2). The operating temp. is lower than Diesel/petrol powered units, hence less OX gases produced. The environmentally friendly option is the HFC vehicle, using 'green' H2. Since it is a Fuel Cell, the electricity generated is from an ion transfer on a membrane. No NOX emissions. So it is a win/win solution. Downside is expense, but RnD will bring this down. The drawback for batteries on construction equipment, beside the inadequate running miles, is the weight. Construction equipment means it is generally moving 'weight'. Heavy batteries reduces the weight it can move or carry. Fuel cells will weigh no more, or even less than a conventional engine. Big plus is also no gearbox required, it is 'direct drive'. AS Phyamh said, 'bring it on'

sawazers. My toxic posts eh. No more interaction with me eh. The truth has got you. Bob the fraud is in the same boat as you. Truth outs. Just a meaningless post from you, full of vitriol to stop you replying to my post. You have been weighed and measured, and found wanting. Peddle you nonsense on Cineworld plc.

Matador. lol. Your comments a long way off the mark. lol
So, where's the answer.? What will be a reason to sell?. It's not hard, I've answered your question.

swazers.
'@testpack3 You seem to be out of anything tangible to offer pal. I am disappointed I expected more from you. You are just another anonymous hack who writes hit pieces for pennies. Thats it. You are a tiny piece of a disinformation system, created to mislead the retail investor. You trolls all operate the same, without exception. Prove me wrong?'
I replied to this yesterday, but you had it deleted.
I was pushing an H2 agenda before you knew what H2 meant. I was promoting, on various board the H2 agenda for transportation using HFC, and also EV's. For 3 main reasons;
1) Global Warming. For the doubters, a simple question, ' what if you are wrong'?
2) Millions of deaths Worldwide every year because of polluted urban areas caused by vehicle exhaust fumes. All exhaust fumes, especially diesel powered vehicles, emit carcinogenic.
3) To remove the influence of OPEC and other Oil producing nations on the global economy. It is a cartel designed to create great wealth and disruption. 30%+ of all produced oil goes to transportation.
So swazers, tell me where my disinformation is. ?
Your charts are a waste of time and peoples money. You should not peddle this on any board. FYI only, and keep this a secret. Juvenile companies, and start ups, and OEMs, with little or no T/O have a sp driven by RNS and news. Shock horror. Check it out, learn something. Charts are sometimes useful for companies with track records of T/O, and are generally FTSE 100, 250 , 350 companies. Serious investors look at financial metrics. Google it swazers. Fraud mentioned RSI as a good guide. Again, serious investors will realise when a sp is in 'oversold' territory by the simple PE metric. Of course, the sp will be running known value, but earnings will be subject to the investors research and 'knowledge' of the market. In other words, experience. When you are older, you will hopefully gain some. I'll await you reply on my 'disinformation'. Delete this, again, and you wont have to reply.

Matador. I see you had my post removed. how evealing. I sold 75% of my shares ( adjust your risk) when I post the sp would decline, after someone posted the sp would see a staedy rise. If I wished, I could buy back in now, and have an extra grand in the bank. I take the risk that the EISA might be awarded in the meantime, but, as I've said many times, if the sp hits 20p it will hit a pound. So plenty of opportunity for profit. Capiche? I personally do not think the EISA will 'just drop' one sunny day. The QnA session has promised by the company 'in the coming weeks' has failed to materialise. It knows what will dominate, and appears it has no answers. Now you say you will sell 'when you have a reason'.lol You havn't thought your answer through, as usual, because it begs the question, ' What reasons will you have to sell#. Will a looong delay in EISA be a valid reason, and how looong. Capiche. I know you will not answer, because you are a herd member. What a silly statement you make that 'I hold the company in disdain'. You obviously do not understand the definition. The project is a hreat project, the product is needed Worldwide, and all the financial metrics are excellent. Heard enough yet.lol. My quibble, which again shows you are not 'on the ball' when it comes to reading skills, is the lack of comms by this BOD, and it's poor performance on comms to date. Herd members plse desist from posting about the finance agreements recently RNS. A finance agreement was in place 3 years ago. This new one is not binding, it is a framework for contract should the parties agree. I'm pretty much sure, like std you are in to bankruptcy if that occurs. The herd keep making excuses for the delay ; 'there's no delay,', 'there's things being worked on in the background', 'there's a deal with OCP being worked on' , 'its holidays in Morocco', Matador, why dont you phone the company, speak with graham, and ask him about the QnA, and whatis main problem with EISA. ?
BTW. You are atd arn't you.?

Crude. All that you state is correct. But the idiot Farage, and others did not realise, like any sensible human being would, that the Eu , especially Germany and France would fight, with every tool in their bags, to ensure brexit would fail. It is in their interest for brexit to fail. The better approach would have been the arduous task of regaining some sovereignty by fighting within the EU rather than outside. The Brits always played the 'agreements' by the book. eg EDF is the main contractor, with Chinese finance on the Nuclear PS Hinckley \point C, 2 new reactors, worth £30B+. This is crazy. There are no UK contractors who could have done this? Where are the big UK projects in Eu? None. Within the EU, there should, and should be now, a concerted effort by Govt to buy and use British. Germans buy German goods, sim. with France and Italy. The Brits buy from anyone. We are the biggest importer of Merc cars in Eu. Tesco failed in France and Germany. Lidl and Aldi are raking the money in. We need a sea change in our buying ideology, and act more like our European colleagues.
Rant over, Sorry for OT.

Interesting reading the comments about The failures past events. The 'geologists' comments saying 'sell'was insightful, but the non commercial comment was incorrect, since we have 4, I think' wells that flowed with 'above' commercial quantities. The big mistake The bean counting failure made was not monetising those discoveries at the time. The one comment from Mitchener that really exposed the direction of the company under The Failure was when he was asked how many shares he held in SOU, and replied 'not enough'. I contacted the company and was told he did not hold any shares. So holding none was 'too many'.lol. I bought my main tranche of shares in SOU at the 4p offer when it was Sound Oil. Around 2014 probably. I sold and bought over the following years, and indeed bought as high as 60p. I dripped the sells on the way down, and kept a few thousand for daily sp price checks. Naturally, I am more happy now that we have an OnG man at the helm. Will things move fast enough, of course not. I am in another AIM company in Morocco, a start up mining company for Potash. This company is being tested to the full limit by Moroccan bureaucracy, and/or lack of info. from the company. I will always remind investors that the prime directive of any CEO, especially with AIM companies, is to make themselves rich, and secure their families future. If the company succeeds, that is a bonus.

BTW Crude, how's Brexit going? And don't forget. you chose this platform to express your political ideals, I did not invent them for you.

Fraud anomoly. You are welcome to Brasil anytime for a guided tour of RdJ.( You're not George Santos are you, he's wanted in Brasil on fraud charges - oh, hang on, he's also a narcissist. Have i stumbled on something?).
I laugh at your comment dranomoly was a cartoon character. It was aptly chosen by you. If the cap fits, wear it.. It sort of contradicts your statement on here a few days after you joined this board. You were questioned if your monika was a medical degree, and you said no, it was a PhD awarded in New Zealand. After reading several of your posts, and specifically your debating style, I knew you were a fraud. Simple really. I have worked with many PhD colleagues, and none are attention seeking, narcissists like you. I know this polemic will not shut you up, but a visit to my 2 properties in Brasil will certainly do it. Anytime, but you have just missed Carnival. Naturally, you are friends with swazers. Peddling his nonsense on here.

Atd.
'Equally if it was nit suitable from day one it would have been rejected ages ago.'

How do you know it has not been rejected?. You have argued in the past that the company does not have to isue RNS on every detail. This can be seen by the company as a 'detail', since it will put forward other options. lol. When will you personally be 'concerned' about the non award of EISA. End of April, August, December, end of '24? . My guess for you is bankruptcy after everyone else has skidaddled.

aandi.
I read the link to Zeus and their report on EQT. And, just like your constant referral to other research reports, none of them mentioned, or hinted at the subject of todays RNS. Please desist in posting these nonsensical reports, since they are paid for by EQT, probably written by EQT, and are only fit for one thing - cleaning after no. 2s.