Member Info for Techtonic

I very much doubt today's early action was to do with CDT. However any CDT watcher will see one of those most powerful technical indicators I mentioned - flagpole and pennant.

I expect CDT to bounce up to 4.5 in a few days.

That 'trader' today - if, indeed, it was one trader buying and selling, will blow all his /her trading stash in 20 trades if they carry on like that! Total waste of time.

Green , Brond et al..

I hope the next news isn't late April FY results... It will mean they tag on some pretty anodyne stuff.

Anything that's mind-blowing will have to be RNS'd - hopefully before that, with time periods talked about on here.

Last thing!

Flawed reasoning I think FF..

Those 100, 000 "additional" cases aren't additional are they?

They are people who would go on to get stage 3 and 4 lung cancer - this demanding more expensive and extensive treatment at that stage.

By finding the Cancer at stage 1 the treatment will be less intrusive and less expensive

Evening Brond..good to "see" you

I'm off now.. early tomorrow and driving to Manchester.

Some interesting points tonight.. but I agree with what you've said

I think there's a bit of idealism going on in your theory.

I understand what you're saying, that demand of patients could suddenly tsunami and outstrip supply of treatment.

It may be that some individual States will have concerns about this..

But if you're extrapolated that theory across the board, then no medical advancements would be made.

Remember there are thousands of companies across the globe developing state of the art treatments / tests for a multiplicity of ailments.

Please come to market as and when they are marketable and when the science proves them up. No one waits for infrastructure...although, as I say, there may be localized concerns if thousands more present for treatment.

But I see that more as a political issue rather than Ciz ' responsibility

"on it" not innit. I is not a rapper, innit .

Personally I think the answer is in your last response...

Someone bigger will take this on and pay for it too. I think we're going to be taken out fairly rapidly here. We definitely need a bigger presence to push it globally

Interesting take innit FF, and thanks.

If "end-to-end care" was required in situ before tests were brought to market, there would be no tests coming to market!

Hang about...

Ciz's test (at the moment) is not about detecting faulty genes/ morphing them, it's about detecting stage one lung cancer.

There's also been some science in the public domain that maybe this can then be developed into stopping cancer before it starts with Gene alteration.

But at the moment, that's in the pipeline way down there...

If Ciz were waiting for that development we would never get anywhere. That will probably take years and years.

First things first. I believe this will be in the market ASAP as long as the science has been proved up on mass scaling

There is a paradox and contradiction in what you're saying:

A)Radio silence is good. Ciz don't release pump and dump RNSs"

B) The next RNS won't deliver a concrete pathway"

By definition, B contradicts A

B is fluffy and a pump and dump. But A says that do t do that.

Interesting conversation this..

So, notwithstanding what you're saying now, what was your oblique reference on Jan 16 that commented on your "positive belief" that something good was going to happen in March and you quoted a reference shareprice of 2.69.

Have you now changed your mind?

Same with other countries

What's your background area of expertise if you dont mind me asking, Fastfood?

I understand what you're saying about care and support if the test is going to diagnose millions more people, who aren't in the system already.

However, is that really Ciz's call? And how can infrastructure be put in across the United States to preempt a test that may detect more cancers?

Surely that's put in the cart before the horse, and that infrastructure is not the and that infrastructure is is the wider responsibility of the healthcare system.

And surely Ciz cannot wait on it's tech for infrastructure to catch up?

Regarding

Who said anything about an exact "production start date"?

However , as OAPk alluded to there is some conflict of language and opinion over clinical trials for large scale production.

Have these been done and will we get the results of them in the next RNS?

Is so, and the results are good, (and we don't wait for the patent - which I don't think we will) then everything is in place to officially launch the test in the US.

Will there be exact dates/States/ etc? Maybe this part will be a bit woolly, because the take-up is an unknown.

But I would be interested in your reasoning for saying "the next RNS won't have a concrete route to production".

With Biotechne inside and Corepath plus Behnke, just let us know your reasoning behind that..

Why are you so certain about what you're saying?

So what do you expect the next RNS to say... And why has there been such a delay, with AS saying "we hope to have this in the market in the very near term"

Any comments from Neil etc .

I'm sure you're reading

Just seen your second message..

That is a statement that needs explanation.

"You ABSOLUTELY do not foresee commencement of production"

You must explain that one I think. Are these just your mullings or have you more info? And how come you have suddenly decided to say that after saying you weren't going to say anything?

Steady on, Fastfood.

Can you clarify your contradiction here.

1) you say the next RNS will be woolly, "leaving more questions than answers"

2) but then you go on to say "radio silence is fine", that he doesn't release insignificant news , implying the next RNS will be significant.

Clarify please...

And are these just your musings (and was this what you had in mind to tell us back in January?)

Some good posts last night if anyone missed them on Bill Behnke.

By the way, just had a thought on some of the block sells. I wonder if Ciz have been using the drawdown but not RNSing and that's what we're seeing?

Didn't you make a comment on that OAPK or was that a different tangent?

Yes, Brond,

Although it is possible that Ciz just need a registered base and this is it.

I may be able to report a little bit more tomorrow evening, will see.

I've stopped being lazy.

By the way, 1 Charterwood is Bill Behnke's home address.

If you go on Google maps you will see a massive house with a nice swimming pool!

Post of the Week,

JBmcr

Great find