High powered sources snd HP sauces.28 Mar 2026 11:24
Just a comment from a career long-gone in the media..
It's impossible to judge the nature of "sources, hearsay, implication, information, disinformation, heard in the pub etc" on here.
Back in the day I would label a "source" as someone with genuine inside information who was trustworthy and the info was likely to be bona fide.
A source would be someone high-up or someone who knew someone high up, or an insider with a grudge etc.
So we've had Bermondsey first hearing things by email? And backed up by a source? Saying CLIA and launch imminent.
Now we've got Hogbog with a "source" who says "weeks or months" away.
Now I've no idea of who these sources are but I'm guessing that they haven't been worked/developed over the phone or in person over a period of months.
I'm guessing from hogbogs past posts that it won't be an insider who he meets secretly .
I'm guessing it's more likely a simple e-mail contact or a company sportsman like Tim Metcalfe etc.
E-mails or official lines are NOT likely to give you anything that is a real inside line - unless you have developed a real relationship over several months.
I started trying to go down that line years back but couldn't be bothered to be honest.
But I can't say for sure that that particular "source" gave me some Duff information that I think they wanted me to post on the here to test me.
So unless , hogbog, you can go slightly further with your information I'm taking it as neutral.
And Bermondsey, if you can add anything to the conversation it would be more than welcomed .