The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
Hi mate.
I've been quiet because I've been making phone calls and waiting to see what happened.
I called Bill Behnke 2 weeks ago and he was on business in the Cayman Islands.
I'm surprised he snswered and had a short chat.
He said he would call the next day but then has second thoughts obviously after calling Ciz.
I've been holding off a pal doing an article (fairly positive in the Daily Mail)
But I think that the gloves are off soon, as this is getting a bit sniffy .
After years of investing the smell of a rat becomes quite pronounced.
I could be wrong, but something amiss. Not only gut feeling but time scales / reagant manufactured.
Shall I comments on Singapore???!
Neil?
OAPK..
You've always been a bit obtuse! Although fair minded and skeptical.
I'm with VV here..
When you start being overtly lied to, then that's when faith goes
I was tempted to derisk at 2.7p.
Next time on fluff I will
Starting to get a bad smell here .
Will let you in on the Bill Behnke set up soon if smell doesn't go .
I think you can categorically say that this RNS contradicts at least the sentiments of the last six months.
If they are not going to RNS things that works both in the positive and the negative.
This time scale is obviously a negative.
Agree with VV completely ..
This has got all of that feel about s bad aim company.
Why don't you call the company and ask about China?
Ask about Bill Behnke and the registration..
Sorry TM . This is now starting to sound like BS
Daily Mail soonish?
Old Jace..a young 'un obviously.
My guess ..somewhere between 18 and 30.
Never cancel someone because there's always tid bits that are pertinent.
I find cancel culture really immature and dangerous.
Anyway back to the point.
Why have the company changed to France?
Why are they changed without RNSing?
Isn't anyone else's suspicious here?
Maybe people have lost their objectivity because of our investments.
There is something here that just feels wrong
I hope not but it's the fact they're not saying anything but things are going on in the background.
I suppose you could see it as being positive. But that would be a subjective feeling without empirical data
So, someone on here mentioned why no mention on MSM.
Since , although I have a science degree, I used to work in the MSM, and have a good pal on the Daily Mail invested here...
I think it's nearly time for the company to put up or shut up. And since Ciz is obviously only releasing the things they feel is pertinent in a positive way - but obviously avoiding negative aspects..
There's something not quite right here. Either in message communication, or actually covering negative results.
Those out there will know what I'm talking about.
Apparently the BBC and Sky have been notified..
But now things are getting a little bit confused...
What exactly is going on with these tests??
Why are new companies involved??
Where are the results??
"seems Cizzle will be more Central to getting in this to market"
Indeed Green.
Probably if you live in Jace world that is good news, but if you live in my world it's bad news.
More fragmented, more potential problems communicating between groups, more logistical problems more delays.
I've stated before I believe China is off the table for now. Always did. Radio silence confirms this.
I also cold-called Bill Behnke. Surprised he picked up the phone.
Can't say much really , not that much was said!
Overall impression with Ciz. Disappointed no clinical trial, sensitivity results etc etc..
I think they are trying to get several locations across the globe sorted out.
I wish someone big like Biotechne was running it as it just feels too big for Cizzle to me.
I would like the results of the sensitivity specificity..that is fundamental.
CC - sometimes it's psychology but sometimes it's real when you're sold a pup.
And what I mean by that is I think the company (AS) has been falsely bullish on his timelines last year.
Seems that there is still a hell of a lot of work to be done, and it's all rather ambiguous.
I like clarity and definitives.
If they're going to be mealy-mouthed /tight lipped with RNS' then the podcast and interviews in between shouldn't give falsely leading information.
I could go a bit into the Bill Behnke situation but I won't.
So some of the psychology you talk about, is partly psychology but partly from my own research too.
I'm more annoyed they're not using the CDT shares, but I also think that RNS as the typical Aim (I know we're not aim) feeling of jam tomorrow.
I'm surprised we've still got reagent and testing in front.
Maybe old Widdy can replace Neil as king of the board ! ;o)
You don't have to read between the lines much to see that this is months away.
I think the company have been a little bit disingenuous with their positivity on timelines.
To be honest I'm not impressed by what Neil has had to say, or not saying; either is information is Duff, or something else going on.
I've made numerous phone calls myself to various places, I'm getting a little bit jittery with answers and conversations.
At the very best this is a quite a major delay and disappointment about Biotechne.
Are we experiencing problems with reagents or up scaling.
Absolutely not happy today as I'm tied in for much longer and it feels a lot more murkier. The tone has changed from definitive, to maybes
They could have used CDT for funding.
No bigger tie up with biotechne.
Got a feeling time scales are being stretched out aka lifestylrw companies.
AS getting to market in the" v near term "starting the sound like Bull.
So this was the reason for the price rise in recent days.
Not happy at all and I think this is very ambiguous.
But I'm locked in now with quite heavy investment.
Think the company are being a bit loose here on progress and timelines
We'll see
I very much doubt today's early action was to do with CDT. However any CDT watcher will see one of those most powerful technical indicators I mentioned - flagpole and pennant.
I expect CDT to bounce up to 4.5 in a few days.
That 'trader' today - if, indeed, it was one trader buying and selling, will blow all his /her trading stash in 20 trades if they carry on like that! Total waste of time.
Green , Brond et al..
I hope the next news isn't late April FY results... It will mean they tag on some pretty anodyne stuff.
Anything that's mind-blowing will have to be RNS'd - hopefully before that, with time periods talked about on here.
Last thing!
Flawed reasoning I think FF..
Those 100, 000 "additional" cases aren't additional are they?
They are people who would go on to get stage 3 and 4 lung cancer - this demanding more expensive and extensive treatment at that stage.
By finding the Cancer at stage 1 the treatment will be less intrusive and less expensive
I think there's a bit of idealism going on in your theory.
I understand what you're saying, that demand of patients could suddenly tsunami and outstrip supply of treatment.
It may be that some individual States will have concerns about this..
But if you're extrapolated that theory across the board, then no medical advancements would be made.
Remember there are thousands of companies across the globe developing state of the art treatments / tests for a multiplicity of ailments.
Please come to market as and when they are marketable and when the science proves them up. No one waits for infrastructure...although, as I say, there may be localized concerns if thousands more present for treatment.
But I see that more as a political issue rather than Ciz ' responsibility
"on it" not innit. I is not a rapper, innit .
Personally I think the answer is in your last response...
Someone bigger will take this on and pay for it too. I think we're going to be taken out fairly rapidly here. We definitely need a bigger presence to push it globally