Member Info for Teacup64

IK - Ok then, at what stage would you consider that an opinion becomes agenda driven? .....you seem to think that it can happen!?!? Lol.

Hahahaha Dalesflyer ;)

"Teacup was wanting to crowdfund a case against Ross. I think the intention was to charge Ross with "having an opinion" or maybe "having an IP address", not sure".

The reason your not sure IK is because you didn't read it.

1) I never said crowdfund, I said the company should fund.

2) It was never about charging Ross for having an opinion, as I mildly agree with him. It was actually about an opinion that continues day and night, and has done for months. Is that an opinion or an agenda at play? ......So for what it's worth, I said criminal charges.

Hi Joe,

I was actually referring to the "Teacup loves men" comment.....that's just getting low, would you not agree?

As for the "No shares"......does that really matter?

The rest of your post I have no issue with to be fair, although I wouldn't go as far as saying that they should be replace...but if you feel that's best....

The Companies Act requires a minimum of 5% of the companies share capital to invoke a meeting to discuss removal of board members. If this is achieved the resolution then allows all shareholders the opportunity to vote on whether that particular board member remains or not, any majority decision wins.

LGO - Just to confirm, that wasn't a critisism by the way ;)

I do know what you mean, he has a very excitable attitude as well, which I think rallies up all sorts of misconceptions and expectations, so I do agree that he should work on managing expectations better.

LGO-Fan - Then again, what if LKs Goudron plan actually works, just later than we, or he, expected? WF aside, I do remember when Goudron was producing ~250bopd, and we've far passed that already. If LK actually hits 1000bopd by year end, average production, would he have failed to meet his targets then? ....I guess we'll have to wait and see, but the MEEI report doesn't strongly suggest that production has increased, but neither does it suggest who has dropped production.

Guys, instead of acting like chilldren by name calling and throwing insults, why dint you instead challenge my points I raise with actual argurments of where I'm wrong....it may even give your arguements some credibility!

H50- I see where your coming from, it seems a reasonable approach.

I'm unable to check my notes as I'm out now, so you may need to correct me here...

I thought that CB said it was worth $800k used price...at least that's what I thought I jotted down. Secondly, I believe the Omnia alluvial plant shown on the website was taken over by Moz Gold.....that's the plant that I believe is in question.

If your talking about alluvial diamonds, then yeah, I can imagine the pre-sluice would be the same....but that's just a guess, as I know nothing of diamonds really. I guess the real question would be....Was the plant unable to capture fine gold because the plant(sluice) itself was configured to capture diamonds instead? ....but CB failed to mention this to us.

...Who knows, it could have spent 6months producing Pukka Pies for all we know ;)

I have nothing in my notes about the plant being new, or old for that matter....if it's not in my notes, I usually assume that it hasn't been mentioned. Moz Gold has 3 South African directors, who themselves are connected to Kimberley Diamond Mining I think it was called. CB limited his words to, "their professionals", but omitted the fact that they were professional diamond miners, not gold miners. I am under the assumption that the plant is for gold extraction, but because most things are shrouded in mystery at XTR, the plant could well be for diamonds? .....but I think it's for gold.

Fantasy - Not sure if you were asking a question, or suggesting something else...

AP personally has 10% interest in BP, 2.5% interest in Blueberry, 10% interest in the combined Zagra assets, and 10% Interest in any future acquistions that Vast make from the assets held by Remin.

This was confirmed by AP in the latest Q&A.

Lol, beat me to it ;)

Hi Gixxer, what was the email address you created for this purpose please?....I thought we only had to make a vote, not email as well. Thanks.

Here's an idea for a hard brexit, that will force the EU into submission...

We should threaten to create a tax haven just off mainland Europe to attract the businesses into our jurisdiction. We could also facilitate the ease of setting up offshore individual trust funds and other vehicles for every EU citizen to avoid having to pay tax within their own jurisdictions....that would bring the EU to the negotiation if they realised what the potential of Brexit could mean if our MPs had the balls to demonstrate allegience to their own citizens!

Without going into detail, another British controlled tax haven is not what I believe the world, or we need, for many reasons. But that would be interesting to joyfully watch the European Commission have to visit Downing Street to negotiate reasonable terms of post departure Brexit.

"Brexit always meant anything you wanted". It's interesting that you say that. David Cameron created that reality, or failsafe plan to prevent Brexit if you like. In 2015, whilst David Cameron was in power, the EU Referendum Act 2015("Act") was enacted. The legislation cleary states the options that should be present on the ballot papers... "Remain in the EU", or "Leave the EU". We all know what 'Remain' means, but as for what 'Leave', means, strangely, the entire Act doesn't mention anything about what leave actually is! I don't believe politicians ever wanted out, the least they appear to want to accept is a 'Deal'. A 'Deal' scenario lands us a €39b Bill, stripping of our voting and vetoing powers, but forces our legislative powers into the hands of Europe....So bad is a 'Deal' scenario, that it actually makes 'Remain' a much more attractive option. Many have shouted that anything but hard Brexit was undermining the democratic vote, on the basis that sovereignty was what Brexit was truly about....but that's not what the Act defines 'Leave' as....intentionally some might say. Furthermore, if our elected officials chose to ignore the the democracy in this instance, that wouldn't be considered as undemocratic. The Act strangely doesn't include any legal threshold to be achieved to win a vote, which makes the vote an opinion, rather than a vote to make change...this means that politicians have no obligation to enforce the Brexit outcome to its truest meaning. When legislation is undefined on such a scale as the EU Referendum Act is, you can be certain that politicians are doing everything they can to avoid a hard Brexit....hmmmm!

Well, at least we know that if snow doesn't fall this Christmas, we can be sure that the SP certainly will....Nothing better than a little reassurance from the big man on a of salary, who's probably having Turkey this year!

Vauch - Yes, I'm also quite suprised that the 'shares in issue' debate created more enthusiasm and chat than the RNS did!

Stephen54321...however old you are, grow up a little would you, you sound silly.

This is getting painful now. I know it's the spread, but nobody wants to buy in which to cause the price to do otherwise. Why would anyone want to buy XTR shares? There's nothing been happening for years, except for repetitive land division, mentions of negotiations that haven't developed to anything we can even remotely sense, just false promises and lack of will to actually achieve these things. That's why the SP is constantly falling!