Member Info for Teacup64

TBTT - Does AP have a legal obligation to promote the company to potential shareholders? ......and is that what he would be demonstrating by responding?

Dodge - In the meantime whilst I'm waiting for APs response, I'm gonna mull through some information, see if I can find anything.

Hmmmm......I can see where your coming from to be fair. I've sent AP an email, just waiting for a response.

I have to agree with Badgernator, I think this was more a desperate measure to quickly cover until T2 arrives.

Lol, it had actually, or seemingly stopped already ;)

Besides, none of us will be banned, even temporarily, the rules on disruptiveness aren't being broken, so they will have no reason too.

But continuing where we had left off, the arguement seems to have ended.

Yrabs - I accept it when the silencing isn't one sided, thanks.

GG79 - "I should leave the board in peace".....and why wasn't that possible yesterday after my OP?.....you seem to have missed that part.....was it because I was defending myself against accusations of deramping or not?

GG79 - I was assuming that everyone was on the same page in regards to this being about 'news' on T2, I never meant it as T2 itself is coming. But the email itself wasn't reflective of T2, but Marange instead. To make a statement, and then provide nothing to back that particular part up, is misleading.

I agree, nobody should purchase based on BB info, but my theory posted, never should have got the response it did, but it did, and I will defend my points to the core by attacking those that tried to wrongly write me off as a deramper over a valid theory.

Furthermore, I am not saying that 99% didn't lose there money due to funding, but his constant ramping without a doubt, has an effect on people's perception of the reality of the state of the company, in many ways.

You say that you never jumped me, concerning the AP Options thread', I'm not saying you did, but instead referring to those that did, for an opinion we later found out to be accurate.

The reason I am persistent is because it appears that many are willing to bury my posts with heaps of optimistic ramping.....how is someone later that day going to see that post when it's buried under masses of deramper accusations and ramps? .....It won't be seen, hence my persistence.

FAHP - Ah, but that wasn't referring to T2 though. It's T2 that being questioned at the moment, not Marange.

FAHP -

Concerning statement 1: "How is this a lie we have had news on T2 as he advised and I am sure Marange will follow".

Yes we have had news now, but you didn't know that before, but still claimed that AP had emailed you about T2 yesterday....you posted your emails when requested, and there wasn't a mention at all about T2 in there.....so why did you say to everyone that he had told you when he hadn't!

Concerning statement 2: "Again this has been updated today so how is this a lie".

I'll give you the exact same answer as I used before for this one.

You don't need to respond....If thats the way you want to evade the reality of your manipulative behaviour. Anyways, I guess that brings thisxdebatecto a close then.

Morningsun - I prefer to keep posts in place, it helps as evidence for an arguement. I can assure you that it wasn't me that deleted your post.....and why would I?

So far, FAHP has kept quiet (from our arguement I mean)....I'm only now responding to those that comment to me....as you'be seen.

This is the second post I have made on the VAST board, both have blown into huge, unnecessary wars, simply because some Vasters don't understand, or don't want to hear the points I raise.

Point 1, APs Options - I was shot down, labelled a deramper, and the board descanded to havoc, only for AP to confirm my every word.

Point 2, Theory About T2 Delay - Again, a valid point, which we are still waiting for, along with a reason, if it comes. And again, a few Vasters would prefer to wrongly call me a deramper, again, bring the board into disrepute, even though FAHP is now seen to have actively misled people.....and that's acceptable?!?

Voltmeter - Perhaps you should direct your blaming to the accused instead of defending his actions with your statement.

There were some well informed posters....why aren't they challenging my OPs then?....have they sold?....or are you just using them to leverage your point? .....because quite frankly, I couldn't care less. Perhaps you should channel your energy into cleaning the board of dampers, rather than realists!

Slugworth - If you'd bothered to read where this "bickering" derived from, you would realise that FAHP jumped on me yesterday for proposing a plausible theory for the delay in T2. I am defending myself as it turned out that he was misleading people with a statement he made regarding an email he had received.

Yes, news relating to T2 did come today, but that's not what AP told FAHP, which FAHP said he did....that is actively misleading investors because at the time, he wasn't party to that information, but guessing.

I'm happy to end the arguement the moment he accepts his wrongdoing, because in the meantime, other investors are losing money as a result of comments like those said by FAHP. You can call it childish, or accept that it was a blatant overt ramp with the intention of misguiding folks.

Indeed Ian, it just makes me wonder if those who bought back in on the climb yesterday, were further reassured by some of the comments made.

Sandcrab - Thats not what's being questioned...it's FAHPs credibility due to a misleading statements he made. So please, interrupt on the basis you know what we're talking about. Thanks.

Did he actually say news for T2 was coming, or not?

FAHP - The fact that I provided the times of your two posts, and that is not good enough for you to even bother to look for yourself, demonstrates that you just don't want to accept your statement was misleading...

Post 1, as a response to my 'Tranche B' theory post:

"AP confirmed just today we will get news on both the Marange Diamonds and also T2 soon".

Post 2, under the Title of 'Email Update':

"Asked AP about T2 and he said they will update the market on that shortly".

So your now claiming that you never said that AP had told you that T2 was coming? .....Well, I hate to say it, but that's exactly what you said, hence my accusation of you misleading people.....so you say that I'm wrong, how?

FAHP - The fact that I provided the times of your two posts, and that is not good enough for you to even bother to look for yourself, demonstrates that you just don't want to accept your statement was misleading...

Post 1, as a response to my 'Tranche B' theory post:

"AP confirmed just today we will get news on both the Marange Diamonds and also T2 soon".

Post 2, under the Title of 'Email Update':

"Asked AP about T2 and he said they will update the market on that shortly".

So your now claiming that you never said that AP had told you that T2 was coming? .....Well, I hate to say it, but that's exactly what you said, hence my accusation of you misleading people.....so you say that I'm wrong, how?

Yrab - To be fair, I think a podcast may actually come today or tomorrow, regarding the bridge.