RE: RNS21 Dec 2018 20:29
Badge - Thanks. When I say phrases like "everyone jumps me", or "everyone labels me", which I do say, I don't literally mean anyone else other than those who it's applicable too. I just say "everyone" because the weight distribution of users for and against my idea, or point, is usually far stacked against me....yes I understand many maybe sensitive to certain topics I raise, but it is never done with an agenda to undermine confidence in anything other than the specific point itself.
Yeah, your on my cool list. You've never said anything to offend or divert, so we're cool.
I said earlier to someone that I am persistent for a reason. Looking at the AP Options issue for example, I managed to extract from the limited responses given, that most users are happy with AP being awarded if they get rich in the process. It's the only public opinion I can realistically gather on a certain point, so I work with it.
Now, what they decide they are all happy with is no problem to me, but as its the retail investor that levies the most voting power, a test of who is for or against options being granted, allows me to determine the length of time I am happy to stick around. I don't need to recycle my philosophy on bonuses again, but you know my position on this matter already.
I am personally looking for a holder base that's willing to shape the management, rather than the other way round, so hence why I have a shorter investment window than most others here, as I prefer shareholders to be the recipients of the risk the take, rather than management who have a safety net of salary, and a structured bonus scheme for example.