Point for Friday30 Jun 2025 15:52
I think for me one of the interesting considerations is in relation to this statement? I assume they are planning to raise as a result of the demerger (in power), hence the presence of a deficit if they dont successfully disaggregate the two businesses. I dont necessarily object to it, assuming there is a benefit to existing holders and a clear multiplier benefit - but I think it's a question worth asking.
Anyone else have a different take on it?
Conclusion
The Directors have reviewed the Group's cash flow forecasts for the 18-month period to December 2026. The Group's forecasts and projections indicate that under a sensitised downside scenario whereby a demerger is not concluded, there would be a cash deficit from Q2 2026, within 12 months of the balance sheet date. The Group's ability to meet its obligations as and when they fall due is dependent on the stated strategy to demerge the Renewable Power business. If this demerging fails to complete within an acceptable timeframe to the Directors, management is confident that alternate financing options are available at the subsidiary level to fund ongoing project work and overheads. In addition, mitigating actions including cutting discretionary expenditure and deferring creditor payments until subsidiary funding either through demerger or asset divestment is concluded.