Member Info for stokey12

Operastar - In relation to your 17.35 post hydrogen using the PHE technology is expected to be in the £5-8 range. I am not sure who will be setting the price.

We seem to have the development of what seems to be two different types of gassification technology. The US Gassification which can be seen by Way2H, Sierra Energy and SGH requires the vapourising of the feedstock to remove the harmful gases. The vapour has to then be cooled so that the Hydrogen can be separated. I am not convinced by the viability of this method. Sierra Energy are the most advanced user of this technology but does not seem to have had much success with it beyond funding from the US Defense Department. The UK gassification technology which is used by EqTec and PHE uses Ultra Heating that turns the feedstock into a gas from which hydrogen can be extracted or used to create electricity or both. In the case of both PHE and Eqtec research is assisted by university tie ups and both have commercial contracts.

It would be interesting to see in the coming years which technology dominates.

LB28 - If by Lansdowne you mean Hargreaves Lansdowne as they are execution only brokers they would only be selling it thier customers were putting in sell orders. The exception to this is if a customer did not have enough money to cover fees then they would sell shares to cover fess.

I know I will be doing that with my topup on PHE which I am planning to do about the same time so would like to grab as many of the shares in this one as I can before it does what PHE did to me and spike higher.

Boo80 In relation to your post of 19.29 please see my post of 05.33 this morning I take it you disagree with what I say in which case I would appreciate your reasoning for doing so.

I will be topping up my holding here between now and September so can I please request that you keep the share price around this level so I can maximise the number of shares I can get. I will be topping up in any event just want to maximise my holding. Thank you

nomlungu - In relation to your 12.24 post I wold make two observations Firstly while thetwo technologies are both gassification processes that is the only similarity. SGH are using Plasma technology to heat the feedstock to a higher temperature. I have some concern as to why they need to vapourise the feestock raher than eat it to a gas. Secondly, it will not be operational until 2022/23 which is after the DMG rollout would have started. So the answer to oyur question is NO.

Mortoncj01 - In relation to your 11.02 No

Jabberba In relation to your 08.48 post I think only two weeks notice is required for an EGM I will check the articles this afternoon once my meeting has finished. I have not seen the circular yet has it been issued.

wiltshireman In relation to your 08.30 post I think this would be a capital not revenue fundraising so I am not sure that it is to pay day to day expenses I could be wrong.

When the annual report comes out next month there are two things I will be looking for. Firstly, revenues we know from the RNS in April that PHE was due to recieve £400k from W2T for work in relation to Protos. We can also surmise that £100k is outstanding. We also know that there were no placings last year. There were also references to tests for customers. At the AGM it was said that PHE was in discussions with 24 potential customers in the UK and one in Spain. From all this it would be fair to assume that PHE had some revenue last year. Secondly. the figure for R&D Tax Credit this first appeared in the accounts last year if this figure has gone up significantly from last year then it might be an indicator that PHE is researching another technology something that was hinted at during the AGM.

Calagcus - thanks for this. I get email notifications or RNSs this one went into junk. I note it is not showing up here.

Ghengis63 - thanks for this PHE should be operational before this comes on stream so woud be able to demonstrate its abilities. I do not see any issue with this. I would query the claims about being carbon neutral though as they are burning carbon and are also using an oxygen enriched chamber to burn the feedstock.

jgbb123 - In relation to your 07.38 post most of us were expecting it to have been concluded by now. Allowing for the necessary formalities to be done I would expect it to be done sometime in Q3 of this year.

kenny100 - Thanks for this hopefully sometime this week it will reach and hold the 52 week high and not drop back.

Ghengis63 No if they wanted to buy shares they could have arranged a placing so as to provide equity funding to PHE.

Malachi - This has been going on for the last week. There is no agreed reason why it is being done. One suggestion is that it is being done by someone who wants to hide that they are building a stake.

Piltick - In relation to your post of 19.40 if you are right then this would give W2T shareholders an instant profit of more than double the value of the shares as at the date of the RNS. As you know some people thought the 40% was an overvalue and it would not surprise me if this would not have caused a rethink on the behalf of PHE on the price. Hopefully we will not have long to wait for the shareholder circular to find out which of us is right.

Since the takeover of W2T was annouced in December of last year the share price has gonr up appreciably. What effect do people think this may have on the takeover. If the takeover price, and we will have to wait to see if this is the case, was for a fixed sum to be paid in shares calculated on the share price on a specific date which is somwthing I have seen, then if that date has not happened this might affect the number of shares needed to complete the transaction.

Before Manabouttown says it I do know that the RNS said that W2T would have 40% of the company but this could have been based on the share price at the time.

Ghengis63 In relation to your post of 14.10 while I have been known to ocassionally write things which can be construed as promoting PHE care needs to be taken not to give the impression that the company does not know or have the money to advertise itself. I would therfore suggest that any promotion should be targeted to government departments, likely customers or parliamentary bodies who can influence government policy.