Member Info for stockscapital

I wouldn't pay too much attention to that. The actual stock exchange itself doesn't publish whether a trade is a buy or sell. It's just this website using its own an algo that places its best guess about direction of trade. They are very often wrong.

Goingtomoon was deramping another stock I'm in (GWMO) when it was literally 1p. 6 months It's now 3.5x above that. A real 5 bagger at one point.

Some posters are a great inverse signal - he's one of them.

GGP to £10 by 2026 end.

Right there with you chief. In time, my bet is the market inevitably come to see it too.

At this point it has become clear TerrorWit is really just enjoying the attention. He must get off on winding people up. His arguments are so lacking in reason, I won't even debase myself by engaging with it. Nobody on here respects him. He will enjoy people responding to his thread. Don't reward him.

The great thing with this situation is the proportion of us private shareholders on the register.

Considering the board needs AT LEAST that threshold of 75% of votes, and they have not announced one single block of irrevocable undertakings of any group of actual shareholders in favour of cancelling the listing - and imagine how hard they tried - this really does mean we are looking good to overturn this.

This is a David vs Goliath fight and I suspect they've underestimated our resolve..

What they're really relying on is voter apathy, people not bothering to vote. That's why it's essential as many of us possible actually vote against.

GL holders

There aren't many surefire things in the world of micro caps, but I'd say a cashed up goldie with a couple of district scale gold properties and $1.5bn of gold in the ground all for a £10m market cap, comes pretty close. Time to load the boat.

As we know for this special resolution to pass, the board requires at least 75% of the votes cast to be in favour of the cancellation.

An opposing block of just 25% of voted shares can completely defeat the attempt.

We have real power here to keep this a freely tradeable and transparent public listing - if enough of us vote against.

But we cannot be complacent - it is vital as many of us shareholders as possible actually cast our vote.

However few shares you might hold - they could genuinely make a real difference here. Remember to vote.

Worth noting if you recently bought shares, they take around 3 working days to settle before you can cast a vote with those shares. Then you can freely vote.

If you've been holding longer than that, definitely worth contacting them.

When a company delists it is highly detrimental to minority shareholders for 4 main reasons:

1) Loss of Liquidity: Shares are removed from the open exchange, making them very difficult to sell. Shareholders face "trapped capital" with no public market to find buyers, and the gap between buying and selling prices (the spread) widens drastically.

2) Loss of ISA / SIPP Tax-Free Status: HMRC rules dictate that ISA-held shares must be on a recognized stock exchange. As private shares do not qualify, investors are forced to either sell at a potential loss before delisting or transfer them to a taxable account, losing all future tax benefits.

3) Reduced Transparency & Disclosure: Private companies are free from strict AIM Rules and Market Abuse Regulations. They are no longer required to immediately announce price-sensitive updates, director trades, or half-year results, leaving investors largely in the dark.

4) Loss of Minority Protections: Without a Nominated Adviser (Nomad) overseeing corporate governance, minor shareholders lose a critical layer of protection. It becomes much easier for majority owners to dilute minority stakes or execute unfair private buyouts.

(Bit of help from my AI pal - but these are all critical factors to consider for us private holders.)

Listing costs only circa £500k, worth every penny for the reporting transparency it brings us - and basic ability to buy and sell our shares in future.

I've gladly voted against to keep this as a plc.

Glass Lewis recommend turkeys vote for Christmas.

They must think shareholders are absolutely stupid.

They've underestimated us.

Just noticed when the share price was last at these levels back in October, gold was ~$3.8k. And we know that back then, the company didn't even own the Molly gold project.

It's become clear this had sold off way too much.

It's impossible to say how/when Iran ends imo, but one thing's for sure, things kicking off again can only be good news for Brent and BP.

I still firmly believe we'll see all time highs for gold (and GGP of course) later in the year. Undoubtedly it'll be a rocky road to get there, and god only knows where gold goes in the week ahead, but for my money there's a real sense that bigger picture bull case if anything grows stronger by the day.

Should be a decent day here tomorrow chaps. Stock like this the perfect insurance policy against middle east kicking off again.

Citytilidie

Why do you think the value of your shares cratered by 50% in a single trading day? You can't be this much of a mug, surely.

Wake up and smell the coffee.

Terrorwit really struggling to put out fires coming from all directions now lol.

Such a patsy for the board, it's genuinely comical.

I've actually lost count of the number of ways in which owning a publicly listed company is better than owning a private one.

Having read all the various arguments, it's striking I've not seen one credible way in which delisting would be beneficial to private shareholders. About £10 million reasons why it would be beneficial for the board though.

The case to vote against is absolutely compelling.

When logged in to your account (web rather than app), go here

https://online.hl.co.uk/my-accounts/investor-mailbox

Scroll down, and you'll see NANOCO GROUP PLC. Click give instruction. There you can vote against the board's attempt to take this private.

(Thanks to Globex below)

Fwiw unlikely Nanonano is linked to the company.

More likely he is one of the posters you see on these boards lost money at some point in a stock - and never quite got over it. Rather than finding new investments to discuss, they hang around on that particular board, sometimes for years after the event, like a scorned ex who never quite moved on.

He wants the delisting to go ahead because he wants to feel vindicated by seeing company's final destruction. Unfortunately he's missed the wood for the trees - namely the special situation this has now become if we secure a vote against the board's grubby delist attempt.

Terrorwit on the other hand wants the delisting to go ahead either because he's affiliated with the comapny - or is so hopelessly in love with it he's happy to be cucked by it.